I am impressed with this comic.

[sirs]

Anti-abortion, what an odd position to take.

BSB

Yea, the idea of supporting the life of an innocent unborn child, who gets no say in his/her execution. is such a twisted position     

[BSB/Hero/Genius/MovieStar]

See. How odd is sirs?

The hardcore anti-abortion people I know are a strange lot. Many of those who just oppose it are sincere people but the ones who go on and on about it, show videos of abortions, etc., are very strange. The most hardcore anti-abortion person I know also happens to be an abusive husband and farther. I'd be willing to bet that if you questioned a 1000 abusive parents the higher percentage would be pro-life rather than pro-choice. 

BSB

[sirs]

See. How odd is sirs?

Yea, the notion of embracing an innocent human life....just so odd to you, isn't it.  Might want to rework your question and start asking yourself why you're so opposed to it.  But not surprising how you're trying to irrationally connect anti-abortion to abusive fathers & husband.  Sad, but not surprising

Sirs

[Xavier_Onassis]

Silly sirs thinks that the unborn are "innocent" Alas, Christian doctrine says that every human is "born in sin". No newborn is free from original sin, which was caused by Adam and Eve following extremely poor culinary advice from a talking reptile.

I don't see where even a fetus would be "innocent human life".

A fetus would be "potentially a human life born in sin, as are all humans."

Of all the humans born since the Year One, only Adam, Eve and Jesus (and possibly the Virgin Mary, if we are to accept official Catholic doctrine) have any claim to having been born innocent. This is not my belief, by the way: it is the belief of the Holy Mother Church.

[sirs]

Silly sirs thinks that the unborn are "innocent"

So do many courts across this country, as they routinely prosecute the murder of 2 persons, in the killing of a pregnant woman.  Bummers, those damn facts keep getting in yours and Bsb's way.  tsk, tsk

[Xavier_Onassis]

The courts rule this way because the idiot ratbag rightwing legislators passed the law improperly defining a fetus as an actual human being. It hardly matters, since the penalty for killing one pregnant woman could not be more severe than killing an unpregnant woman.

Next the ratbag right may define a sperm as a human being, so they can charge any woman who gives a BJ and swallows with cannibalism for eating 3000 innocent babies.

[sirs]

You're all too erroneous opinonated claim is duly noted, debunked with the FACT that CA ( a state being run into Greece-like oblivion by DEMOCRATS, who control the legislature -->  Cal. Penal Code § 187 (a) defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being or a fetus with malice aforethought

Yea, yea.....damn facts

[Plane]

 Well that is interesting.

Google translate used to produce Feotus as the Latin for baby.

Now it is much more precice and agrees with XO completely.

I should have expected this to get fixed.

[Plane]

See. How odd is sirs?

The hardcore anti-abortion people I know are a strange lot. Many of those who just oppose it are sincere people but the ones who go on and on about it, show videos of abortions, etc., are very strange. The most hardcore anti-abortion person I know also happens to be an abusive husband and farther. I'd be willing to bet that if you questioned a 1000 abusive parents the higher percentage would be pro-life rather than pro-choice. 

BSB

What is your point BsB?

I imagine that if Pimps were surveyed 99% would be pro abortion.

Does that make a point?

[sirs]

 

[Xavier_Onassis]

If a sculptor creates a statue, he has an undeniable right to sell it or destroy it.

If someone makes a mess in their own home, they have an undeniable right to clean it up or just leave it for the vermin.

If a woman gets pregnant, she has an undeniable right to have a baby or have an abortion.
 
There is no more reason to let a herd of sirs or planes to decide for her that she must have it.

[sirs]

If a sculptor creates a statue, he has an undeniable right to sell it or destroy it.

Absolutely......its an inanimate, non-feeling, non-human object

If a woman gets pregnant, she has an undeniable right to have a baby or have an abortion.

Absolutely not, as it relates to killing the child.....its a living, breathing, feeling, growing human.  Just because she currently has the right to kill that unborn child, doesn't make it right, or even remotely analogus to a sculpture
 

[Xavier_Onassis]

Sorry, jack, it is only human AFTER it is born.

Sperm are also living human beings according to the same definition. Shall we arrest those who swallow 36789 sperm fopr cannibalism?
Leave the law out of this: it is the right of a woman to bear or refuse to bear a child.

[Christians4LessGvt]

Sorry, jack, it is only human AFTER it is born.

game over
SIRSCongrats on exposing nutty liberal logic.
"only human after born"
means a baby could be aborted at 8 month and 25 days.
of course that is sheer lunacy

[Xavier_Onassis]

That is not a fetus, it is a baby.

You morons cannot tell the difference.