Author Topic: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS  (Read 1727 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8010
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2008, 03:55:09 PM »
not at first
remember that article

the change over must of took awhile after

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2008, 04:25:34 PM »
not at first

Medina was 1997, Davis was 1999. The method of execution was changed in 2000. Three years is a short period of time for legislation (especially when there are on-going court cases and investigations).
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2008, 04:49:49 PM »
Quote
you mean like florida,when old sparky set that guy on fire and he was burning while dying.
and the response in florida was "so?"

The electric chair was a tried and true method, used by several states for many years exactly because it was seen as more humane than hanging. Firing squads can miss vital spots and leave the prisoner to linger for a while. Hangings can go awry, with the same result. The electric chair and, no doubt, lethal injection can also have things go wrong. That's not necessarily cruelty, that's human error.

And that response works for me - "So?"

If you want a no-miss method of execution, have the prisoner seated with two 12-gauge shotguns loaded with buckshot aimed at his brain pan and fire them both at once. That way if one misfires, you still scramble his eggs and he's still a dead sumbitch. But then you get into 'unusual'...
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

_JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3500
  • Salaires legers. Chars lourds.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2008, 04:53:10 PM »
Quote
If you want a no-miss method...

Don't support the death penalty.  ;)
I smell something burning, hope it's just my brains.
They're only dropping peppermints and daisy-chains
   So stuff my nose with garlic
   Coat my eyes with butter
   Fill my ears with silver
   Stick my legs in plaster
   Tell me lies about Vietnam.

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8010
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2008, 06:48:40 PM »
I`m not all that into how effective it is to execute the guy or gal
I`m more into making sure it counts
I notice a avoidance in talks to make sure the person is guilty.
it`s more if the courts find him guilty that`s the final say.
we get upset if a criminal get release due to a technicality but it`s unthinkable the reverse is possible.



Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lethal Injections and SCOTUS
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2008, 06:56:35 PM »
<<I`m not all that into how effective it is to execute the guy or gal
I`m more into making sure it counts
I notice a avoidance in talks to make sure the person is guilty.
it`s more if the courts find him guilty that`s the final say.
we get upset if a criminal get release due to a technicality but it`s unthinkable the reverse is possible.>>
______________
Then I don't think it ever counts. It isn't effective. We don't "fight crime" with killing  someone. Killing someone for killing may make us feel justice has been done but it doesn't prevent others from repeating his/her crime.
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.