Yea it was, given what I responding to. Your timeline has yet again been tweaked. I post a serious article, with a catchy title, intending to facilitate serious debate
B take the opportunity to dump on Palin instead
I criticise B for that. And THAT's the part you use to conclude "..end of life counseling" was ever the intent of the poster. Apparently the whole purpose of this thread is to dump on the dumpers and vice versa."
You also added to the apparent lack of wanting to disccuss the issue at hand, by erroneously inferring some apology was required before such discussions could take place, by inquiring why is such an apology necessary, rather than discuss the issue at hand
So bascially, you responded to me similar to how you erroneously thought I was responding to B
Yea, your bad
So, if you ever intend to disccus death panels, vs dumping on sirs, by all means, I'm all eyes. If your intent is, as I deduced, merely trying to erroneously paint sirs as someone who doesn't want to debate issues, & merely dump on others, you can do that with Bsb to your heart's content