Author Topic: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.  (Read 2137 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« on: November 13, 2006, 11:49:44 AM »
Quote
Moment of Zen Yogi

Did You Know?

In 2000, Joe Lieberman's Republican challenger received 448,077 votes. http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000senate.htm
In 2006, Joe Lieberman's Democratic challenger received 448,077 votes. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/

Via Peskfly http://thepeskyfly.blogspot.com//


Somethin's not kosher.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2006, 12:51:40 PM »
Neither link points to the Connecticut Secretary of State Office which is charged with certifying and posting election results.


Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2006, 01:21:16 PM »
And?

Neither one of them points to Dailykos or Drudge either but that has nothing to do with it.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2006, 01:28:31 PM »
Quote
And?

And my guess is you will get different numbers from the official results. And if that is the case you have no conspiracy.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2006, 01:36:18 PM »
Did I intimate there was a conspiracy?

It WAS odd.  It is suspicious but I don't know that I'd say "conspiracy" just yet.

By the by, I've discovered a better phrase for stuff that people call "conspiracy".

Deep politics.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_politics

Also, how do a I put a hyperlink behind my own words in this new thing?  Whenever I click on the "insert link" button, all it does is put url before and after.  It used to have the "hyperlink=" stuff in there.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2006, 01:38:28 PM »
I like the word parapolitics too.

W's gang does parapolitics better than Nixon ever hoped to.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2006, 01:47:12 PM »
open bracket url=http://apnews.myway.com//article/20061111/D8LB4FQ00.html close bracket open bracket Article close bracket open bracket  /url close bracket

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2006, 02:15:34 PM »
close bracket open bracket Article close bracket open bracket
                   ^^^^^^^^           ^^^^^^^^

These aren't needed.

[url=http://apnews.myway.com//article/20061111/D8LB4FQ00.html]Article[/url]

This will work.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Lieberman opponent totals exactly the same.
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2006, 02:16:38 PM »
Did I intimate there was a conspiracy?

"Somethin's not kosher" seems to indicate that.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)