16
3DHS / Re: Take this, you 7 year old bitch!
« on: August 05, 2010, 05:24:12 PM »
I know. Not enough use of capital letters or over-the-top language about the ruinous threat of unlicensed lemonade sellers.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Sorry Prince, not going to play that game of yours today
No you don't.
YOUR issue is this need to agree to your version of immigration & its "significantly relaxed" requirements, otherwise one apparently doesn't support immigration
I'll be waiting when you're ready to discuss restricting some of your significant relaxation mandates. Then we can address some of my willingness to lessen the current ones
The issue is two fold.
Immigration
and how to handle those who enter the country illegally.
Never said literally, merely the implication was transparent
However since I don't agree with your version of "significantly relaxed", apparently that translates into me not wanting immigration to even occur, or that I'm against immigration because I make it so hard
I see your point though, just make it so easy, that nearly everyone entering is "legal", problem solved. Problem is, it doesn't
The American People should have no say in this matter!
Clearly, I don't support your version of "significantly relaxed restrictions"
No one said it was a closed border.
Your insinuation of how "difficult" it is, literally "preventing" an unskilled immigrant from coming to this country, is pretty transparent. Your application in the use of not supporting "significantly relaxing" current immigration requirements, is also duely noted
For it to be a lie i would have had to have said that the required paperwork was automatically approved.
I didn't. Which makes you the liar.
Of course some applications are turned down.
Legal immigrants by virtue of their status did this.
Illegal immigrants by virtue of their status do not.
Should a person give the government a chance to approve or deny a visa?
Why should a government have any controll over who and what crosses its frontiers?
You pointed out that crossing state borders inside the US was done for serious and trivial reasons with little or no regulation.
But you skipped a step somewhere in jumping on twards saying that croissing international borders is equivelent to crossing borders internal to a country.