Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MissusDe

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 15
46
3DHS / Raise your hand if you know this.
« on: November 10, 2008, 10:06:58 PM »
Without using Google...who said the following?

"There will be times when we must again play the role of the world's reluctant sheriff. This will not change - nor should it."

Answer

47
3DHS / Interview: Meet Joe the Plumber
« on: November 09, 2008, 08:46:26 PM »
He just wants the American Dream ? and politicians that secure our freedom to achieve it.

He?s going to be a country music superstar. He?s starring on the next season of ABC?s reality series, The Bachelor. He signed with Ben Affleck?s agent. He was seen canoodling with comedienne Kirsten Wiig after John McCain?s recent appearance on Saturday Night Live.

Those are just some of the (sadly untrue) rumors that have been floated about Joe the Plumber in the weeks since his unlikely rise to national notoriety. But with the election over, and Joe?s preferred candidate having lost, what?s the most famous plumber since Mario going to do now?

National Review Online?s Mark Hemingway caught up with Joe Wurzelbacher a few days after the election to ask him about U.S. politics, Obama, his new-found fame, and more.

NRO:  So what happened in your home state of Ohio? Why did it go for Obama?

JOE THE PLUMBER:  It was pretty close. Quite frankly, Obama ran an incredible campaign. It was very organized and he communicates very well. It?s usually split anyway, you have more Democrats up north and it?s very conservative down south. Which way it goes depends a lot on the rhetoric of each side. Obama?s rhetoric was very good.

NRO:  Is there anything that you?re looking forward to about an Obama presidency?

JTP:  No. There?s not anything I agree with in what Obama has put forth. That being said, there?s a lot that I don?t agree with that John McCain has said either. Unfortunately, there wasn?t one candidate I agreed with 100 percent, so like the rest of America, you voting for whoever is closest to what you like.

NRO:  Are there any politicians in America right now that you do look up to for guidance?

JTP:  Alan Keyes is absolutely an incredible man. I like a lot of what he says. Maybe part of his problem is that he?s too smart and comes off very condescendingly. The answer seems so obvious to him he doesn?t see why the public doesn?t see it. But personally, I?d much rather have someone who?s a little condescending but has the right answer.

NRO:  What?s the most pressing political issue you think Americans need to confront?

JTP:  The health insurance issue. Having a government provide that type of assistance is just going to tie up millions and millions of dollars of taxpayer money ? that?s something that shouldn?t happen in a democracy. If the government starts taking on these things ? like they have with the bailout ? owning banks, owning properties, taking care of everyone?s health, you?re leading us away from a democracy and turning it into a socialist society. It?s a very serious business.

NRO:  What?s the biggest threat you think Americans are facing?

JTP:  What scares me is it that Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are congratulating Obama. If our enemies are congratulating Obama ? that scares the hell out of me.

NRO:  So what?s next for Joe the Plumber? Will you run for Congress?

JTP:  Well, I won?t be the next guy on The Bachelor. I don?t plan on being a country music star, and I have no interest in Congress for at least ten years. I?m hoping this watchdog group comes to fruition and that will be what I spend most of my time on for the next few years to come.

I?m starting two websites, which are still getting up and running, but we?re getting incredible feedback. The first website, secureourdream.com, is going to be a watchdog group to make sure that we hold not only the Democrats but also the Republicans accountable and make sure that they remember that they?re working for us. Too many times they get on the Hill and they forget that ? they get a sense of entitlement. We want to take that sense of entitlement away and make sure they?re working for us and not the other way around. If that interest was there prior to the bailout, maybe we could have headed that off.

The second website, secureourdream.org, is going to be a charity. Americans give more money to charity than any other nation in the world and that?s where I think spreading the wealth should start.

NRO:  What are you doing about the allegations that state authorities in Ohio accessed your personal information in order to use it against you?

JTP:  A point needs to be made that actions like that cannot take place against private citizens. I asked a question and there were no grounds whatsoever even by their own guidelines to look up my records and leak them to the press. That?s asinine and completely wrong. I plan on taking every step I can to make sure that doesn?t happen again. I?m not the type to sue and I?ve always spoken against it, but this is an intrusion and other Americans might be scared to ask elected officials questions again in the future. We can?t have that.

NRO:  Have the ACLU or any other civil rights groups contacted you about what happened?

JTP:  Funny you mention that, but no [laughs]. It kind of makes me wonder what those groups are for ? or who they are for. It?s kind of wild that none of those groups have contacted me, given that my civil rights have been violated.

NRO:  Now that you?re famous, have you given up on plumbing?

JTP:  About an hour ago, I had a buddy of mine call me up and ask if I could come and fix a stool for him. I?ll still do that kind of thing and I enjoy working with my hands. I?ll always do that.

NRO:  Has your unexpected rise to fame been a blessing or a curse?

JTP:  To be honest with you I was very happy being a plumber coming home hanging out with my son and doing it all over again the next day. So I thought I had the American dream. I had my house, I had my boy, and we had a lot of fun. I was pretty content.

So as far as this goes, I don?t really have an answer for you yet. My life got turned upside down.

The Corner

48
3DHS / Re: Palin spent more on clothes than was announced
« on: November 09, 2008, 08:10:47 PM »
I've never done the 'buy and return' bit, either, although I know there are people who do that.  When we went shopping for Anna's prom dress last spring, I was amazed at the number of (very expensive) dresses on the racks with stains, snags, loose and missing beadwork, pulled seams...you name it.  Sure, the store discounted those dresses a bit.  But I just could never understand the mentality behind the process.  Even after spending more than I'd planned on for Anna's dress, I wouldn't dream of returning it. What kind of lesson does that teach?

49
3DHS / Re: Is it Cool to be an American Abroad Now?
« on: November 07, 2008, 10:34:00 PM »
Quote
On another occasion, an Austrian who heard my teenage daughter chatting with a friend pursued her, screaming, "Go Home!"

Hm.  I'll have to check with Anna when she gets home, but as far as I know, she didn't encounter any animosity during her trip to Europe - and Austria was one of the places they toured.  The group spent time shopping, etc. in the cities, so it's not like they were confined only to the touristy-type places where they'd be less likely to cross paths with the residents.

50
3DHS / from 52 to 48 with love
« on: November 07, 2008, 01:31:16 AM »
I like this.  Scroll down


51
3DHS / Re: Obama is President of the United States of America
« on: November 06, 2008, 04:50:26 AM »
Quote
We spend plenty on football equipment for about 40 students a year though. Most HS's have no decent language lab, but they sure pay a ton for football uniforms and insurance. No one ever gets killed learning a FL, but every year football kills several dozen HS kids and wounds many more for the rest of their lives.

Math, well, there is just no excuse. True, learning math is boring, maybe even more so than FL's, but jeez, everyone needs math. About 80% of the faculty at my college seems to need someone else to do their income taxes. With the programs that are available, that is just pathetic.

The issue of music programs getting cut because there isn't enough funding is a sore subject with me.  In our district, the music program begins in 4th grade with a mandatory song flute unit.  Kids who want to continue in band begin classes in 5th grade.  We've got two high schools in town, and the one my kids attended offered the best music program.  Our school's orchestra has been one of the highest rated in the state for many years and was at one time the only full symphony orchestra at the high school level; every spring the kids travel to a major competition (Hawaii one year, NYC another).

The only reason that the program was able to keep running was because of the Booster Club's participation.  We have an arrangement with the local Bingo Hall, where we provide all the volunteers to run Bingo one night a week and in return we receive a percentage of the proceeds.  At one point, we had such a hard time getting volunteers to work that the Bingo Hall was going to take our night away - less workers meant we had trouble getting around to the players to sell games, etc. which meant the players were impatient and grumbling about the lines - which led to fewer people showing up to play on our night...your basic vicious cycle, but one which drastically affected the music program.

Instead, music programs are suffering because of budget cuts and are forced to seek creative methods to raise enough money to keep the programs afloat...even when it's been established that there's a connection between music instruction (especially piano) and the ability to learn math.  You'd think that the schools would use this to help facilitate teaching math. There was a study done that measured the effects of music lessons on three year olds. The results showed that children who received voice and keyboard lessons scored between eight and ten points higher on IQ tests that measured spatial-temporal skills ? important components of mathematical reasoning.

But the athletic programs continue to be fully funded. 

Now, I realize the importance of athletic programs in high schools.  All of my kids played soccer.  But the reality is that out of all the kids who play high school sports, very few of them are good enough to continue playing in college; even fewer will play professionally.  That means that a lot on money is going to support activities that the majority of the participating students won't continue after they graduate.

However, the ability to understand and use math is something that every student needs.  Schools have a tool available to them that can help students succeed in math, and they're ignoring it.  That makes absolutely no sense to me...but then again, I've never quite understood the need for our high school to have JV and Varsity badminton teams, either.  I can understand football, baseball, basketball, wrestling, soccer, swimming, and track and field...but badminton? Please. Golf as a high school sport is another waste, as far as I'm concerned.

I'm not saying to shut down the athletic departments and get rid of all of the sports programs...just put the music programs on an equal footing.  And start the music programs earlier.  I'd wager that we'd see a significant increase in not only math test scores, but in English and science as well.

52
3DHS / Re: To my friends on the left . . .
« on: November 05, 2008, 04:42:36 PM »
Hey, Pooch!  Good to see you again.

Not long ago I saw a behind-the-scenes thing about a young guy who was hired as a dancer in the newest Disney parade - the theme was Pirates of the Caribbean, and I believe this was filmed at Disneyworld. I was immediately reminded of your son; watching this show made me realize how difficult it is for those performers.  Their ability to be able to execute the choreography, handle the props and maintain the correct distance between dancers all while moving along the parade route takes an incredible amount of talent and stamina...they're really amazing.

I hope you're going to stick around...I enjoy reading your posts!

53
3DHS / Re: Obama is President of the United States of America
« on: November 05, 2008, 03:11:27 PM »
Henny!! It's so nice to see you...it's been far too long. 

My baby is 18 now...sigh.  She's going to the local junior college and working at 6 Flags/Marine World, and is exploring the idea of finding some sort of work/study program in Europe. The summer before her senior year, she toured Italy, Austria, Switzerland, and France as part of the People to People Student Ambassador program.  She absolutely loved it, and would really like to go back to Italy.

How fantastic that your son is learning so many languages!  You're so right about kids and their ability to pick up languages when they're young.  That's one aspect of American education that I've always found lacking; we should be exposing our kids to foreign languages from the moment they start school.  It's never ceased to amaze me how so many people from other countries speak English fluently, while Americans can't be bothered to learn another language...and what's worse is that so many high school seniors are barely proficient in English (both reading and grammar skills) when they graduate. 

I'm sure you're enjoying every second of being a mom...however, I'm warning you - the older you get, the faster time flies by.  It's unbelievable that when I first started chatting back in the old Yahoo days, Anna had just turned 8.  She gets a kick out of the fact that I sometimes have trouble remembering certain events or dates from the past and delights in reminding me that old age does that to people, but it's not old age; it's just that all those years sped by in a blur. How could I be expected to remember stuff that hit my brain at the speed of light?

That's my story, anyway.  And I'm sticking to it.

54
3DHS / Re: I just paid $1.99 for gas.
« on: November 05, 2008, 03:42:40 AM »
$1.99??  Dang!

I pulled into a station today that showed $2.73, but saw that the pump price was actually $2.53 - the clerk had just started to change the price on the marquee as I drove in.  I don't think I've ever seen the price drop as much at one time before.

55
3DHS / Re: Obama Admits He Will Make Energy Costs "Skyrocket"
« on: November 03, 2008, 07:43:43 PM »
Yep.  No more bills to worry about, no more gas shortages...we're finally being delivered from evil incarnate.  And to think, all it took was blind faith.

56
3DHS / Obama's sliding tax scale
« on: November 03, 2008, 07:33:42 PM »
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqNnHvXUlA0&NR=1[/youtube]

57
3DHS / The theme song Obama should have used....
« on: November 03, 2008, 06:43:52 PM »
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0hyExZ9Dfo[/youtube]

For those who don't know, that's from A Mighty Wind, one of Christopher Guest's excellent mockumentaries...it follows the televised reunion of three 'beloved' folk singing groups.  The songs were all written by cast members, who also sang and played the instruments.  As with Guest's other movies (This Is Spinal Tap, Return of Spinal Tap, Best In Show, Waiting For Guffman, and For Your Consideration), the movies are unscripted; Guest and Eugene Levy write a basic plot along with character outlines which are given to the actors, but beyond that, all of the dialogue is improvised.  In Waiting For Guffman, Guest's character is casting parts for Blaine, Missouri's 150th celebration.  When he filmed the audition sequence, he had purposely waited until the actual filming to see the performances of the various hopefuls, and his reactions to them are hilarious.  I definitely recommend all of these movies - and make sure to listen to the comment tracks by Guest and Levy, too.

58
3DHS / How Many Laws Can One Break?
« on: November 03, 2008, 12:46:44 AM »
Victor Davis Hanson

Mr. Obama's Aunt Zeituni will not be a major campaign issue?compared to other last minute disclosures such as Obama's frightening boast about coal that now produces half of our nation's electricity: "If somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."

Yet in retrospect Aunt Zeituni will prove emblematic and raise a few disturbing questions (aside from the ethical matter of someone who was highlighted in a cameo fashion in his memoir as proof of his strong family ties, subsequently languishing as an illegal alien, in violation of a deportation order, in a public housing project a hour's flight from Chicago). Everyone has relatives that one is not responsible for, but given her symbolic appearance in Dreams from my Father, and at the Obama swearing in in 2005, Auntie Zeituni seems more in the Roger Clinton/Donald Nixon/Billy Carter category.

1) More proof of media bias: The press story is somehow now about who 'leaked' information that his aunt had defied a deportation order and was in the country illegally rather than yet another sign that US immigration law is made a mockery of, and its enforcement is a joke, to the rather limited extent the law is even applied. And if one wants to know the extent of government intrusion into the lives of peripheral political figures, the media should at least worry why agencies were put onto Joe the Plumber, who is a US citizen.


2) More of the double standard. David Axlerod is suddenly worried about supposed Axlerod-like leaks of government documents? Aside from Joe the Plumber, he should ask why and how the sealed divorce records of both Obama's Democratic primary rival and his general election Republican opponent were leaked, imploding both campaigns and ensuring the election of Obama in 2004 to the Senate.


3) Obama's has offered the defense that his historical rejection of campaign finance (after a promise to abide by the law), and subsequent creation of a $600 million war-chest should not cause worry because so many of the donors were "small". Hence any questions about fake names, addresses, lack of compliance with identifying donors by name, foreign contributors, and prepaid credit cards were essentially nit-picking or worse, given the historical lift Obama had given the American electoral process.

But if the Obama campaign cannot even guarantee that his own aunt followed the law (it is illegal for foreigners to contribute to US presidential campaigns), what does that say about the millions of others who, we are supposed to believe, on the now dubious assurance of Obama himself were supposedly legitimate and lawful donors? And as a sidelight, how ethical is it for someone who is in violation of immigration law, and receiving some sort of public subsidy, to then donate money, illegally again, to a campaign? Message: defy immigration law; ignore a deporation order; obtain, again illegally, public assistance; donate illegally to a presidential campagin; and then count on the press attacking those who worry about such serial flouting of the law.

4) Here we are within a few hours before the election, and we get yet another reminder that we have little idea who Barack Obama is; and the media, rather than enlightening us about his background, consistency in thought, past behavior, aassociates, and character, instead turns on anyone and anything that stand in the way of his ascension.

5) The only mystery? Whether we get (1) this is not the Aunt Zeituni I remember....; (2) I was only 43 when she was ordered deported and only 47 when she donated illegally; (3) I could no more disown Aunt Zeituni than...; (4) "they" are going to get "ugly" and go after my funny-sounding name and the fact I don't look like the presidents on the dollar bill.

Can't we hope this time for? 'As I have written, I have admired my aunt in the past and value her familial ties to me, and will now make sure that all US laws are followed in her case, and determine to what extent they were not and why, and ensure that this doesn't happen again.'

59
3DHS / Preparing for the aftermath
« on: November 02, 2008, 11:26:06 PM »
Police prepare for unrest

Police departments in cities across the country are beefing up their ranks for Election Day, preparing for possible civil unrest and riots after the historic presidential contest.

Public safety officials said in interviews with The Hill that the election, which will end with either the nation?s first black president or its first female vice president, demanded a stronger police presence.

Some worry that if Barack Obama loses and there is suspicion of foul play in the election, violence could ensue in cities with large black populations. Others based the need for enhanced patrols on past riots in urban areas (following professional sports events) and also on Internet rumors.

Democratic strategists and advocates for black voters say they understand officers wanting to keep the peace, but caution that excessive police presence could intimidate voters.

Sen. Obama (Ill.), the Democratic nominee for president, has seen his lead over rival Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) grow in recent weeks, prompting speculation that there could be a violent backlash if he loses unexpectedly.

Cities that have suffered unrest before, such as Detroit, Chicago, Oakland and Philadelphia, will have extra police deployed.

In Oakland, the police will deploy extra units trained in riot control, as well as extra traffic police, and even put SWAT teams on standby.

?Are we anticipating it will be a riot situation? No. But will we be prepared if it goes awry? Yes,? said Jeff Thomason, spokesman for the Oakland Police Department.

?I think it is a big deal ? you got an African-American running and [a] woman running,? he added, in reference to Obama and GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin. ?Whoever wins it, it will be a national event. We will have more officers on the street in anticipation that things may go south.?

The Oakland police last faced big riots in 2003 when the Raiders lost to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in the Super Bowl. Officials are bracing themselves in case residents of Oakland take Obama?s loss badly.

Political observers such as Hilary Shelton and James Carville fear that record voter turnout could overload polling places on Election Day and could raise tension levels.

Shelton, the director of the NAACP?s Washington bureau, said inadequate voting facilities is a bigger problem in poor communities with large numbers of minorities.

?What are local election officials doing to prepare for what people think will be record turnout at the polls?? said Shelton, who added that during the 2004 election in Ohio voters in predominantly black communities had to wait in line six to eight hours to vote.

?On Election Day, if this continues, you may have some tempers flare; we should be prepared to deal with that but do it without intimidation,? said Shelton, who added that police have to be able to maintain order at polling stations without scaring voters, especially immigrants from ?police states.?

Carville, who served as a senior political adviser to former President Bill Clinton, said that many Democrats would be very angry if Obama loses. He noted that many Democrats were upset by Sen. John Kerry?s (D-Mass.) loss to President Bush in the 2004 election, when some Democrats made allegations of vote manipulation in Ohio, the state that ultimately decided the race.

Experts estimated that thousands of voters did not vote in Ohio because of poor preparation and long lines.
Carville said Democratic anger in 2004 ?would be very small to what would happen in 2008? if the same problems arose.

Carville said earlier this month that ?it would be very, very, very dramatic out there? if Obama lost, a statement some commentators interpreted as predicting riots. In an interview Tuesday, however, Carville said he did not explicitly predict rioting.

?A lot of Democrats would have a great deal of angst and anger,? said Carville, who predicted that on Election Day ?the voting system all around the country is going to be very stressed because there?s going to be enormous turnout.?

Other commentators have made such bold predictions.

?If [Obama] is elected, like with sports championships, people may go out and riot,? said Bob Parks, an online columnist and black Republican candidate for state representative in Massachusetts. ?If Barack Obama loses there will be another large group of people who will assume the election was stolen from him?.. This will be an opportunity for people who want to commit mischief.?

Speculation about Election-Day violence has spread on the Internet, especially on right-wing websites.

This has caught the attention of police departments in cities such as Cincinnati, which saw race riots in 2001 after police shot a young black man.

?We?ve seen it on the Internet and we?ve heard that there could be civil unrest depending on the outcome of [the election,]? said Lt. Mark Briede of the Cincinnati Police Department. ?We are prepared to respond in the case of some sort of unrest or some sort of incident.?

Briede, like other police officials interviewed, declined to elaborate on plans for Election Day. Many police departments have policies prohibiting public discussion of security plans.

James Tate, second deputy chief of Detroit?s police department, said extra manpower would be assigned to duty on Election Night. He said problems could flare whichever candidate wins.

?Either party will make history and we want to prepare for celebrations that will be on a larger scale than for our sports teams,? Tate said.

He noted that police had to control rioters who overturned cars after the Tigers won the 1984 World Series.

?We?re prepared for the best-case scenario, we?re prepared for the worst-case scenario,? he said. ?The worst-case scenario could be a situation that requires law enforcement.?

But Tate declined to describe what the worst-case scenario might look like, speaking gingerly like other police officials who are wary of implying that black voters are more likely than other voting groups to cause trouble.

Shelton, of the NAACP, said he understands the need for police to maintain order. But he is also concerned that some political partisans may point their finger at black voters as potential troublemakers because the Democratic nominee is black.

Shelton said any racial or ethnic group would get angry if they felt disenfranchised because of voting irregularities.

Police officials in Chicago, where Obama will hold a Nov. 4 rally, and Philadelphia are also preparing for Election Day.

?The Chicago Police Department has been meeting regularly to coordinate our safety and security plans and will deploy our resources accordingly,? said Monique Bond, of the Chicago Police Department.

Frank Vanore, of the Philadelphia Police Department, said officials were planning to mobilize to control exuberant or perhaps angry demonstrations after the World Series, which pits the Phillies against the Tampa Bay Rays.

He said the boosted police activity would ?spill right over to the election.?

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/police-prepare-for-unrest-2008-10-21.html

60
3DHS / Dems for McCain: Why John McCain will win Pennsylvania
« on: November 01, 2008, 01:02:30 AM »
Breaking: Here?s what we know about Pennsylvania right now
October 28, 2008

Tonight we spoke with a friend from Hillary Clinton?s campaign who is now working for McCain/Palin ? and is specifically working with Democrats for McCain in Pennsylvania. We worked with her in Texas, Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania for Hillary and have spent many LONG hours with her in the trenches in all of those states. She?s smart, doesn?t BS, and never lies.

She says the same thing we do: John McCain will win Pennsylvania.

On November 4th, the news networks are going to be spinning and sputtering and playing catchup, but everything we see on the ground in PA is what we saw during the primaries: Obama has no shot of winning the Keystone State.

Here is specifically what we talked about tonight: never in any of our careers have any of us ever seen members of one party switching sides and voting for the other party as we see in this election with Democrats for McCain. There has never been anything like it.  Not even the ?Reagan Democrats? who voted for Reagan over Carter, for the simple fact that these ?Reagan Democrats? weren?t identified and labeled until AFTER the election.

No, Democrats for McCain are real, are voting for McCain right now, and are open and organized, as well as self-identifying.  Lynn Rothschild might be our poster gal, as one of the most prominent of our ranks, but it?s telling that everyone from Team Hillary that we know now works for McCain.  ALL OF US. Whether they are open about it, like we are, or are working quietly behind the scenes, we can?t think of a single person we worked with on a daily basis for Hillary who is now working on behalf of Obama.

We all truly believe that John McCain will work more closely with Hillary Clinton in the Senate and make it a priority to team up with her on legislation than Obama ever would. We also believe Obama winning this election means his supporters would actively seek to eliminate all Clinton loyalists from the Democratic Party, to consolidate his power base and purge anyone who is not 100% loyal to him.  For obvious reasons, those of us loyal to the Clintons will not let that happen without a fight.

But, this is all talking about leadership, and those of us who have invested two years of our lives in all of this ? and have, in all honesty, spent every cent we had on this campaign. What about the regular voters?

Union members repeatedly tell all of us that they are lying to pollsters because the unions have been polling these people ? and the unions will threaten people?s jobs if they don?t tow the union line. So, the people lie when asked whom they are supporting. But, the unions can?t control who they vote for on Election Day. And that?s when things are going to get interesting.

We do not believe Obama will carry Pittsburgh or Harrisburg in PA. He?ll win Philly, but not by the large margin he needs to take the state. You?ve heard Governor Ed Rendell is ?worried? about Obama?s chances in Pennsylvania. That is an understatement. Obama will lose a state that hasn?t gone red in generations.

What?s happening here that?s not being reported is that ?Reagan Democrats? who vote Republican whenever they feel that Democrats are out of touch, socialist, or too liberal are voting for McCain?and these people are being joined by PUMAs, DeMcCrats for McCain, Hillocrats, whatever you want to call them, who don?t like or trust Obama and who believe McCain/Palin would address the wants and needs of centrist Democrats much better than Obama ever would.

We personally believe this here at HillBuzz. That?s why we are doing this. We do not believe Obama will put the best interests of Americans first ? instead, Obama will do what is best for Obama, the way he has always done. We do not trust this man or his socialist Kool-Aid and want no part of him.

In Pennsylvania, we are not alone.

The same people who ran the board for us in the primary ? who assured us daily that the polls the media was pushing were wrong in claiming Obama would beat Clinton in PA ? tell us on a daily basis that McCain is going to win Pennsylvania.  There?s a damn good chance this won?t even be close, if what people are seeing on the ground right now holds, and is indicative of the whole state.

DEMOCRATS are staffing McCain offices across the state. DEMOCRATS are phone banking and canvassing for McCain. DEMOCRATS are raising large sums to fund this last week of campaigning.

DEMOCRATS.

This has NEVER happened before ? and the media is ignoring it. The media consistently claims that Obama enjoys the support of 85% of Democrats, versus only 80% of Republicans who supposedly are supporting McCain.  We call BS on all of this ? we?d say 90% of Republicans are supporting McCain, and 65-70% of Democrats are actually supporting Obama. At least that?s the case in Pennsylvania, and in Ohio too. Our mission this next week is to reach out to every Democrat we can and let them know it?s okay to vote Republican this year ? because the Republican is the better choice.

There are two things Hillary Clinton and John McCain have in common that we?re thinking about right now: (1) both love America more than anything and truly want what?s best for the country, and not themselves and (2) Clinton has a framed photo of McCain in her office, while McCain has a similar photo of Clinton in his.

Clinton and McCain are friends for a reason ? and we know they will work well together these next four years. We?re going to face some tough challenges in McCain?s administration, and we sincerely do pledge to all Republicans reading this that the bipartisan spirit we?ve fostered during this campaign working together with Republicans to elect McCain will continue in these next 4 years, because America needs us working together.

We are all Americans right now ? working together to stop a socialist from becoming president and taking all of us down a very dangerous path. Hillary?s Army is strong and mobilized, and is working its heart out for McCain/Palin.  If you Republicans can match our enthusiasm and dedication, we will win this, and not just in Ohio and Pennsylvania, but all across the country.

We have the potential to make this a crippling loss not just for Obama, but for the far-left liberal wing of the Democratic party and the liberal elite media itself. We have the potential to wipe all of these kooks and loons off the political landscape with a loud, resounding loss for all of them on November 4th.

What we have learned about the state of Pennsylvania tells us our continued efforts are paying off ? and that we just need to stay focused and keep working hard the next 7 days to win this for McCain/Palin and, in all honesty, win this for AMERICA too.

It?s an honor to be in this fight with all of you ? if we work hard, we will indeed win.

Hillbuzz

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 15