It does not matter whether there is anything about hunting or slavecatching in the Bill of Rights or not.
You wish. IT ABSOLUTELY MATTERS. What's not there....DOESN'T EXIST. You can use your imagination to make up anything you want. That doesn't make it so, or even truthful. The Constitution is the law of the land. The reasons for not banning guns, was clear in the
language of the Constitution, and specifically, the Bill of Rights. And those words were backed up by the Federalist papers. It wasn't some made up leftist reason about hunting or slaves/servants/field hands. It was the concrete reasons made up by the Founders, which was specific to the limitations the Federal Government could exercise over its citizenry.
So, the idea that the 2nd amendment's primary function was to deal with slaves/servants/field hands & hunting is missing the most intregral component in validating that idea......THE ACTUAL WORDS. The only idiots here are the ones that insist on ignoring both history, and simple-to-read language. Ironic for a language professor, isn't it