16036
3DHS / Re: Ahhh- Cybersex! How sweet & innocent it is.
« on: October 03, 2006, 11:17:26 PM »
And that has what to do with your inability to provide any proof that Hastert knew about the IM's.
Hmmm?
Hmmm?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
16037
3DHS / Re: Ahhh- Cybersex! How sweet & innocent it is.
« on: October 03, 2006, 07:24:47 PM »
No one i know of in here is defending Foley.
You and your ilk overreached trying to make this about Hastert and GOP Leadership.
And then forgot to bring facts to back up those charges.
Pity.
If you had any credibility, you have even less now.
You and your ilk overreached trying to make this about Hastert and GOP Leadership.
And then forgot to bring facts to back up those charges.
Pity.
If you had any credibility, you have even less now.
16038
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 03, 2006, 04:02:34 PM »
Right before the old 3DHS crashed, there was a discussion about a bill in OHIO to create a civil registry of sex offenders. There was much wringing of hands about how reputations would be destroyed by creation of same. I mentioned that reputations are just as easily destroyed by the wolfpack mentality of the press and partisans when a story breaks to their advantage. I believe i was hooted at derisively. And then comes this.
No proof that the smoking gun IM's are real. No proof of child molestation at the hands of Foley. No proof that GOP leadership was aware of the alledged IM's and there is not a dem in the house that doesn't have blood dripping down their chins from this feeding frenzy.
Hat tip to UP for being consistent. The rest of you should be very proud of yourselves.
No proof that the smoking gun IM's are real. No proof of child molestation at the hands of Foley. No proof that GOP leadership was aware of the alledged IM's and there is not a dem in the house that doesn't have blood dripping down their chins from this feeding frenzy.
Hat tip to UP for being consistent. The rest of you should be very proud of yourselves.
16039
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 03, 2006, 03:54:43 PM »
The IM's took place in 2003. The Adam Walsh ACT was passd in 2006 and is not retroactive.
Greenwald is either an idiot or is being deliberately misleading.
Take your pick.
Greenwald is either an idiot or is being deliberately misleading.
Take your pick.
16040
3DHS / Re: Ahhh- Cybersex! How sweet & innocent it is.
« on: October 03, 2006, 03:30:05 PM »
Still over reaching.
There is no evidence that Hastert et al knew about the IM's.
For that matter there is no proof that the IM's are genuine and unedited.
There is no evidence that Hastert et al knew about the IM's.
For that matter there is no proof that the IM's are genuine and unedited.
16041
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 03, 2006, 12:07:14 AM »
No need to split hairs if the facts are on your side.
But you wouldn't know about that, would you?
The smoking gun is the IM's. You haven't shown that the GOP Leadership knew about them.
They did know about the emails to the kid in Louisanna. And that was nipped in the bud.
Like isaid. You have nothing but false bravado.
But you wouldn't know about that, would you?
The smoking gun is the IM's. You haven't shown that the GOP Leadership knew about them.
They did know about the emails to the kid in Louisanna. And that was nipped in the bud.
Like isaid. You have nothing but false bravado.
16042
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 02, 2006, 10:08:52 PM »
Knute let me explain this like you are a six year old. Hope I'm not giving you too much credit.
No one is defending Foley.
What is in dispute is you and other tin foil wearing lunatics charge that the GOP leadership is involved in a cover up.
You haven't made that case.
All evidence points to the fact that you don't have a case, and this is nothing more than the big noise machine trying to score some points before the facts come out and your charges are once again discredited.
You would think you would learn from your mistakes, but the trend says you won't.
No one is defending Foley.
What is in dispute is you and other tin foil wearing lunatics charge that the GOP leadership is involved in a cover up.
You haven't made that case.
All evidence points to the fact that you don't have a case, and this is nothing more than the big noise machine trying to score some points before the facts come out and your charges are once again discredited.
You would think you would learn from your mistakes, but the trend says you won't.
16043
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 02, 2006, 08:19:13 PM »Quote
I quess i shouldn't be surprised that you confuse closet guys with closet child molesters.
I would presume a child molestor is one who molests children. So when did Foley molest anyone? When was he even in the same room wth these guys to molest them?
Once again you overplay your hand.
16044
3DHS / Re: GOP Imploding As More and More Details Emerge
« on: October 02, 2006, 05:58:56 PM »Quote
Maf54: I miss you lots since san diego.
Teen: ya I cant wait til dc
Maf54:
Teen: did you pick a night for dinner
Maf54: not yet…but likely Friday
Teen: ok…ill plan for Friday then
Maf54: that will be fun
These are Im's , edited at that. The headline is misleading. Why would that be?
16045
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 02, 2006, 05:55:55 PM »
Brilliant rebuttal.
You know you have nothing.
It's the same big noise machine we saw with Katrina. Fast and furious and when the facts come in you slink back under your rocks.
Look at the headline from Lanya's last post.
And then look at the content.
There is a huge difference between emails and Im's.
You know you have nothing.
It's the same big noise machine we saw with Katrina. Fast and furious and when the facts come in you slink back under your rocks.
Look at the headline from Lanya's last post.
And then look at the content.
There is a huge difference between emails and Im's.
16046
3DHS / Re: GOP Losers Circle Wagons For Child Predator
« on: October 02, 2006, 01:38:08 PM »
Wrong Bucko.
please provide proof that the IM's, which are the only smoking gun in this whole thing, are genuine.
Not like forging documents is beyond the pall for certain agenda driven folk. See Rathergate for more info.
And changing the contents of an IM is childs play. And as the name of the young guy on the recieving end of the IM's name was changed we know that the IM's were edited at least once.
The best information we have right now is that Foley was a "snappy dresser" and that in and of itself is no reason to drum someone out of the caucus. Even his "sick,sick,sick" emails aren't enough, though they are enough for some strongly worded counselling. Which was provided, BTW, at the behest of GOP leadership.
Once again the tin foil brigade overplays its hand, reminiscent of the way you overplayed Katrina (see Brousard of Jefferson County or Giiliards dead nigger gator bait remarks) , by trying to make this look like a coverup.
What it really is, is an example of GOP tolerance for "snappy dressers".
You on the other hand want to mount a witch hunt for closet gays. And who am i to stand in your way.
please provide proof that the IM's, which are the only smoking gun in this whole thing, are genuine.
Not like forging documents is beyond the pall for certain agenda driven folk. See Rathergate for more info.
And changing the contents of an IM is childs play. And as the name of the young guy on the recieving end of the IM's name was changed we know that the IM's were edited at least once.
The best information we have right now is that Foley was a "snappy dresser" and that in and of itself is no reason to drum someone out of the caucus. Even his "sick,sick,sick" emails aren't enough, though they are enough for some strongly worded counselling. Which was provided, BTW, at the behest of GOP leadership.
Once again the tin foil brigade overplays its hand, reminiscent of the way you overplayed Katrina (see Brousard of Jefferson County or Giiliards dead nigger gator bait remarks) , by trying to make this look like a coverup.
What it really is, is an example of GOP tolerance for "snappy dressers".
You on the other hand want to mount a witch hunt for closet gays. And who am i to stand in your way.
16047
3DHS / Re: GOP Imploding As More and More Details Emerge
« on: October 02, 2006, 12:11:10 AM »
Other people had copies of the emails.
Only CREW thus far had the smoking gun IM"S. They were derelict in their ethical duty. The chose to save their trump card for the elections.
Only CREW thus far had the smoking gun IM"S. They were derelict in their ethical duty. The chose to save their trump card for the elections.
16048
3DHS / Re: Allen should 'fess up and be done with it.
« on: October 01, 2006, 09:30:44 PM »
You stated that racist laws were institutionalized in the south and not elsewhere in the country. My posting proved you wrong.
16049
3DHS / Re: GOP Imploding As More and More Details Emerge
« on: October 01, 2006, 09:25:58 PM »Quote
Mikey falsely states:Here's a radical concept for you to try out - - That he sent sexually explicit messages to AN UNDERAGE teenager who HAPPENED TO WORK FOR HIM.
Who did he IM and what proof do you have that this particular page was assigned to him.
And how was Hastert to know of the IM's . It was the emails that were reported to him, and he handled that situation, discretely.
Furthermore the IM's were not to the same person as the emails. And the former page was no longer in DC. So even a far fetched sexual harassment angle won't work.
16050
3DHS / Re: GOP Imploding As More and More Details Emerge
« on: October 01, 2006, 08:55:04 PM »
And what exactly was Hastert supposed to investigate. That one of his members was Gay? That one of his members emailed while Gay? That being Gay is tantamount to being a pedophle?
What law was broken with those emails?
None that i am aware of.
But Foley was told to stop emailing in 2005. The iM's by the way appear to be from 2003 if and when they are authenticated. And IM's are easy to edit an forge.
Methinks the dems would have been better off just bashing Foley for being a Gay Republican. They have vast experience in that field.
What law was broken with those emails?
None that i am aware of.
But Foley was told to stop emailing in 2005. The iM's by the way appear to be from 2003 if and when they are authenticated. And IM's are easy to edit an forge.
Methinks the dems would have been better off just bashing Foley for being a Gay Republican. They have vast experience in that field.