DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Christians4LessGvt on June 18, 2013, 11:26:30 AM
-
Very interesting interview with Commander of Free Syrian Army.
He alludes to what Plane and I both have stated.
That the goal of the West may be a destroyed Syria
and/or a Syrian Killing Field of Muslims slaughtering each other.
http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3875.htm (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3875.htm)
-
From MEMRITV: Egyptian Politician Khaled Zaafrani: Jews Use Human Blood for Passover Matzos
http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3873.htm (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3873.htm)
BSB
-
And this is credible......how again?
-
Is what credible?
-
Your Egyptian politican who apparently claims that Jews use Human blood for passover. How's this blood procured? Does someone simply prick a finger like nearly every person with advanced diabetes does in checking their blood sugars?
-
Ha ha, the point is it isn't credible, obviously.
Why don't you start with the opening post and see if you can figure out what's going on. I won't hold my breath.
BSB
-
So, if not credible, why the post? Is it some lame attempt to imply that the Commander's comments are supposedly not credible? Please explain how so, if that's the case
Don't worry, I won't hold my breath either
-
Can't figure it out can you sirs. Can't figure anything out can you sirs? You're just an obnoxious asshole aren't you sirs?
BSB
-
As i said, I won't hold my breath, if you can't seem to motivate yourself to explain the posting
-
So, if not credible, why the post? Is it some lame attempt to imply that the Commander's comments are supposedly not credible?
Of course SIRS....it a way to change the subject.
It's a diversion away from the subject....rather than deal with the subject matter.
The other video has nothing to do with the Free Syrian Army Commander's comments.
It would be like if there was an interview in Time with Obama & an article on Britney Spears.
And then pretend a Time interview with Obama is not worthy because of the fluff with Britney.
It's lame....but what do you expect?
-
Well deduced 8)
-
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/5919_10151665500354637_1560600272_n.jpg)
-
So lets review what the "Commander" said. He said the west won't supply him with heavy weapons. What are the weapons he wants? Ant-tank and anti-aircraft. Who is the west? He said the west is Uncle Sam. So, what's the outcome of this refusal to supply him with these weapons? According to him it's the destruction of Syria. Why would Uncle Sam want to destroy Syria? Well, according to him, it's because Israel wants Uncle Sam to control who, what regime, is on the Syrian/Israeli border. So, who is it that wants to destroy Syria? Why it's the JEWS, who else?
BSB
-
And more: http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3871.htm (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3871.htm)
-
So lets review ... who is it that wants to destroy Syria? Why it's the JEWS, who else?
About as credible as the Egyptian Politician
-
Of course it isn't credible, moron, that's the point.
BSB
-
The noncredible portion...*insert obligatory insult here*... was your deduction. That was my point
-
From MEMRITV: Egyptian Politician Khaled Zaafrani: Jews Use Human Blood for Passover Matzos
http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3873.htm (http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3873.htm)
BSB
This reaches far back in history, Pogroms and minor harassment of Jews were justified by lies of this sort , pronounced by experts and authority figures. There is no pointing out that evidence is lacking , there is no disproof, the word of the authority is just taken.
As to how to measure credibility, if it is believed , then the believer finds it credible ,even if the pronouncer of the lie knows better himself.
This is a usefull lie , it is very old but may never die.
-
So true
-
"As to how to measure credibility, if it is believed , then the believer finds it credible ,even if the pronouncer of the lie knows better himself."
Oh my, how astute.
BSB
-
"As to how to measure credibility, if it is believed , then the believer finds it credible ,even if the pronouncer of the lie knows better himself."
Oh my, how astute.
BSB
Yes a measure of credibility is not a direct measure of truth, I think we agree there.
-
Ok