Author Topic: Sandy Burglar  (Read 1520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

R.R.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1128
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Sandy Burglar
« on: December 20, 2006, 06:37:34 PM »
Report Says Berger Hid Archive Documents
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Former national security adviser Sandy Berger removed classified documents from the National Archives in 2003 and hid them under a construction trailer, the Archives inspector general reported Wednesday.

The report was issued more than a year after Berger pleaded guilty and received a criminal sentence for removal of the documents.

Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that when Berger was confronted by Archives officials about the missing documents, he said it was possible he threw them in his office trash.

The report said that when Archives employees first suspected that Berger - who had been President Clinton's national security adviser - was removing classified documents from the Archives in the fall of 2003, they failed to notify any law enforcement agency.

Berger, who pleaded guilty to unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents, was fined $50,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service and was barred from access to classified material for three years.

The report said that when Berger was reviewing the classified documents in the Archives building a few blocks from the Capitol, employees saw him bending down and fiddling with something white, which could have been paper, around his ankle.

However, Archives employees did not feel at the time there was enough information to confront someone of Berger's stature, the report said.

Brachfeld reported that on one visit, Berger took a break to go outside without an escort.

"In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... .

"Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)."

Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.

Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence. The review was to facilitate Berger's impending testimony before the House and Senate intelligence committees.


http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061220/D8M4R7DO0.html

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sandy Burglar
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2006, 06:50:56 PM »
Berger, who pleaded guilty to unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents, was fined $50,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service and was barred from access to classified material for three years.

You mean that he wasn't stripped of his security clearance? In-f'ng-credible.

I've known people who coughed in the wrong direction that were stripped of their clearance.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sandy Burglar
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2006, 07:20:32 PM »
Can you imagine the universal condemnation from the media, the left AND the right, if this were Condi Rice slipping some classified papers into her purse, in "preparation" for ....let's say the 911 Commission?        :-\
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sandy Burglar
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2006, 10:08:33 PM »
Makes me wonder what Clinton could have possibly gotten away with that is still worth a coverup.

R.R.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1128
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sandy Burglar
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2006, 08:13:26 PM »
Makes me wonder what Clinton could have possibly gotten away with that is still worth a coverup.

Shouldn't this be looked into?

If a grand jury can be empaneled with nonsense about a non-covert agent's cover allegedly being blown, when it already was years ago, isn't information of this magnitude worth investigating? What was it that was so important that Burglar risked going to jail over? What was so important that he obstructed the work of the 9/11 commission and then lied about it?