Obama has had it with Putin!

[Xavier_Onassis]

Napoleon's errors were to invade a country whose vastness and climate he could not comprehend with technology that required technology that did not exist. Hitler's main error was to fight a two front war: that was essentially Kaiser Wilhelm's error.

Munich is not a proper analogy here: Ukraine was a part of Russia since the first of the Czars. It is clearly within the Russian sphere of influence: more so than Manitoba is in the US sphere. 

[Christians4LessGvt]

No, everyone didn't know that Obama couldn't be taken at his word.  They do now

[sirs]

*Like*

[Xavier_Onassis]

Just an opinion.
Not a bright one, either.

[sirs]

I wouldn't be so hard on your opinion.  Most often wrong, but I wouldn't imply dumb

So as it relates to the supposed "made up bombers" comment, couldn't help but notice it went unanswered.  I'll endeavor to ask again...If I demonstrate that fact about Russian bombers, are you going to rationalize how its perfectly ok?... pull out the "nothing to see here, move along" card? 

See, if I don't answer it, you'd claim I made it up, as if it was something big if it were to have happened.  If I do answer it, just want to see what your other tact is going to be

[Xavier_Onassis]

Are there Russian bombers buzzing your massage parlor in San Diego, sirs?  Is that what is troubling you?

[sirs]

No. 

Now that I've answered your question, are you going to ever answer mine?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Why should I I have no idea what it is.

Usually your "questions" are things you want me to agree with to boost your faltering ego. I have never understood why you are always seeking agreement. You might ask yourself the same question.

[sirs]

Why should I I have no idea what it is.

What bombers?

You are making up stuff, aren't you?

If I demonstrate that fact, are you going to rationalize how its perfectly ok?... pull out the "nothing to see here, move along" card?

Notice the question doesn't require you to agree with anything, merely demonstrate if my reference about Bombers is important, thus the justified question of am I making it up, or that its no biggie, thus making your question about making it up rather unnecessary

[Xavier_Onassis]

I think you should answer your own questions.
That way, you are going to get an answer you are sure to like.

Ask and answer in different voices. Use puppets. Be creative!

And watch out for Russian bombers.

[sirs]

I'm not looking for an answer I like.  I'm looking for an answer that's honest.  If its impossible for you to be honest...well, I can respect that.  Just be honest with your inability to be honest, I suppose

[Xavier_Onassis]

Honesty has nothing to do with any of this.

[sirs]

Honesty has everything to do with this, and any questions I ask     

[Xavier_Onassis]

Why would you or anyone say that?

I am not obliged to answer your eternal cryptical questions.  You already have an answer for them, you are only trying to play some idiotic ego game that I choose to ignore. I have never promised to "debate" you about anything, nor do I have any obligation to do so.

[sirs]

Why would you or anyone say that?

Because I'm being honest....wow, what a concept

I am not obliged to answer your eternal cryptical questions.  

You're not obliged to do anything but breathe.  This is called a debate forum.  People ask questions to facilitate debate.  If the rather simple questions asked are too "cryptic", you can request clarification.  But any answers are merely to generate honest responses, not something I simply "like".  If you are incapable of that level of honesty, and can only respond with immature snarking & demonizing based on nothing more than they don't agree with your politics....well, I feel sorry for you.