Author Topic: Trump lies and shows his ignorance  (Read 10833 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Trump lies and shows his ignorance
« Reply #60 on: June 25, 2016, 10:59:52 PM »
Let's see her release her speeches she was giving to Goldman Sachs
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Trump lies and shows his ignorance
« Reply #61 on: June 26, 2016, 08:45:24 AM »
There is no precedence for candidates reissuing speeches.

There is, however, for them releasing tax forms.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Trump lies and shows his ignorance
« Reply #62 on: June 26, 2016, 11:25:04 AM »
There is no precedence for candidates reissuing speeches.

There is, however, for them releasing tax forms.
Neither is required.

Both of these refusals are unusual.

Quite likely both are disappointing to scandalistas.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Trump lies and shows his ignorance
« Reply #63 on: June 26, 2016, 12:31:04 PM »
There is no precedence for candidates reissuing speeches.

There is a precedent of politicians not releasing documents that could torpedo their support for office.  This isn't about "reissuing", this is simply allowing a release of her speeches.  It's abundantly clear now at this point, how she apparently has been lying about her disdain and contempt in the greed and actions by folks like Goldman Sachs

"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Trump lies and shows his ignorance
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2016, 07:56:46 PM »
  It isn't bad enough that it is Goldman Sachs that is willing to give her money for nothing and Hillary Clinton that will accept?


   Why do we care what she said?

    How good could it have been?