Black Bishop Launches Brutal Attack Against Democratic Party

[Christians4LessGvt]

Black Bishop Launches Brutal Attack Against Democratic Party

Bishop E.W. Jackson Message to Black Christians

[Xavier_Onassis]

What a turd!

I wonder how much they paid this turkey.

[sirs]

Whatever the amount, he sure has far more credibility than yourself, as you hide from backing up your own claims.  Can't even try to use me as your kneejerk fallback, since it wasn't me who asked you to support one of your latest wreckless accusations, to begin with

[Xavier_Onassis]

Who gives a warm sh*t?

This preacher is a hack, probably a paid hack.

[sirs]

And given the level of credibility in your "accusations" (none), safe to say, he probably isn't

[Christians4LessGvt]

the man speaks the truth...
the truth hurts dont it XO?

[Xavier_Onassis]

He speaks no truth. He makes no sense.

He is full of crap.

[sirs]

And given your 99% record of being wrong and/or inability to support anything you claim, he's apparently just the opposite

[Xavier_Onassis]

A typical imbecilic sirs comment.

It is a waste of time to put stupid Black preachers here to impress me. I have heard all the stupid preachers, both Black and White, that I ever wish to. None has been convincing.

It is just "Christians" waving a flag of Stupid Nation and proclaiming "Look! here is a Black person in a suit that agrees with me!"
That was the entire Herman Cain campaign in a nutshell.

No one is squawking about what a great idea the 9-9-9 plan is now. The moment that Cain was shown to be a serial horndog seducing White women, it was clear to the Republican hierarchy that Cain was poison to an important core Redneck base of the GOP and he was dropped like the trousers of a dysentery victim.

[sirs]

Naaa, the only one throwing out imbecilic comments is the one calling people imbeciles because they dare not agree with him, misrepresenting what others have actually have said or intend, and can't be bothered to back up any wreckess accusation they make

So yea, given your consistency of being wrong nearly every time, apparently this Black person in a suit, is speaking some major truth to get such a rise out of you

[Plane]

.................. he was dropped like the trousers of a dysentery victim.

As metaphores go , that one is compelling more than most.


I still do like Herman and I think that reducing the complexity of the tax system is a good idea.
I wish it were availible .
I didn't even know that Hermans accusers were white, I guess if true I would be sorry to have a Republican version of Clinton.
But could I take the bad with the good and enjoy the simpler taxes ?
I suppose I don't need to decide now , its moot.

Yet still it gives a Liberal a chance to accuse Conservatives of racism, everything does it seems.

[sirs]

So true, so true

[Xavier_Onassis]

I do not think that Cain could be accused of racism for propositioning White women. It may be sinful, it may be impolitic, but it is not racial.

But it is certainly a fact that he would not get more votes for having done it from many, many White folks (not to mention more than a few Black women). It certainly caused him to plummet as a presidential prospect, and I had nary a thing to do with it. It is not my fault that White people in the South (and other places as well) would have voted against Cain for his transracial horndoggery. I am not a racist for pointing this out, contrary to the weird notions that seem to go a-snapping across sirs' defective synapses.

I agree that taxes are too complex for some people. On the other hand, Cain's 9-9-9 plan was not going to raise enough revenue if enacted, and would have had no change of making it through Congress.

[Plane]

The main problem with the 9-9-9 idea is that it would rob Congress of one of its major powers.

The cutting of deals for the sake of favorable tax loopholes is a congressional power that has enriched a lot of the congressmen and staff.

Taxes now are so complex that congress itself does not understand , but in the placememnt of loopholes is such power and ability to do favors that we should expect complexity to continue to grow.

Revenue be dammed , we had plenty of revenue back when there was no Income tax at all, there is more than one way to improve revenue including having a tax law simple enough to need less manp[ower to implement and enforce it.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Revenue be dammed , we had plenty of revenue back when there was no Income tax at all, there is more than one way to improve revenue including having a tax law simple enough to need less manpower to implement and enforce it. \

-============================================
You were not alive when there was no income tax. It was enacted in 1916 to finance WWI, which we were forced to fight so JP Morgan would not lose all the money he had loaned to the Brits. It was not our fight.

The first income tax only applied to a few very wealthy people.

Before 1916 people lived shorter lives and a lot of them starved.

My point is that Cain's 9-9-9 plan was unable to stand on its own merits. Once Cain was fingered as a serial horndog, his "genius" program expired immediately.