Author Topic: Nicholas II for Tsar  (Read 1058 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Religious Dick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1153
  • Drunk, drunk, drunk in the gardens and the graves
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Nicholas II for Tsar
« on: October 29, 2008, 12:28:05 AM »
Nicholas II for Tsar
Posted by John Zmirak on October 28, 2008

On February 25, 1917, Russian soldiers serving Tsar Nicholas II in St. Petersburg faced a choice. On November 4, 2008, Americans voters will stand in the same position. They must choose between a crooked, bumbling oligarchy prone to starting futile wars - and a ravening, reckless mob. While it's mostly made up of citizens rightly enraged, the mob is led (or will soon be led) by vicious ideologues who promise to persecute Christianity. (Be patient, I will explain.)

There is no third living option, no better Tsar ready to reign. That option was tried, has failed. If the soldiers fight to save the Tsar, they preserve a regime that sent their brothers to die without meaning, without rifles-in a faraway land, for lies. They will save the elite that let the monk Rasputin set national policy, which bankrupted and bled their Fatherland. Surely, the new men grabbing for power must be better. How could they be worse?

The mob is shoving through the snowy square, chanting and screaming, blood already on its hands. The officers - fat men who've never missed a meal or seen the front - are rushing up and down the line, urging soldiers to follow orders. Their moustaches are immaculately groomed, but they quiver. For the first time in their military careers, these men really are afraid. The mob is 1,000 feet away. Now 500 feet, and charging. You hear the order: "FIRE!" What do you do?

This cheerful scene is what faces American voters next week. I needn't remind most readers how badly the Tsarist party has governed. Or point out that the new heirs to the throne are clustered with Rasputins. If we turn back the insurgents at the gate, the old guard will chuckle and muddle right along, slowly wrecking the country.

What happens if the radicals win? If we join the mob, or support a hapless pretender (in some third party) and fire into the air?

I?ll tell you one thing, just one, that will happen, if Barak Obama is elected with a large Congressional majority - with perhaps enough votes in the Senate to quash a filibuster. And that one thing should be enough.

Senator Obama has promised to sign the so-called "Freedom of Choice Act," which would repeal every restriction on abortion in every American state, right up through the ninth month. But then, we knew that about Barack, the whole infanticide thing.

There's more. The FOC Act raises abortion to (in its own words) a "fundamental right." According to legal analysts at the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops, the act's language is so sweeping that it will snuff out any state's "conscience" clause - the laws allowing hospitals, doctors, and nurses not to take part in abortions. To do so would amount to illegal discrimination, denying a citizen her fundamental right. Christian hospitals could no more decline to perform abortions than they can currently refuse to operate on black people.

So President Obama and his congressional supermajority would force every Christian hospital, doctor, or nurse either to abandon their faith, or go out of business. By federal law, believing Christians would be banned from a major industry (and apostolate). This is literally equivalent to a law banning faithful Jews from owning newspapers.

History tells us that steps such as this aren't where religious persecutions end. It?s where they begin. Things are already scary enough in neighboring Canada, where Christians are now routinely hauled up before human rights tribunals for repeating what the Bible teaches concerning sex. Who knows what some Obama-appointed judge, 20 years from now, will make of a pastor whose sermons attacked the "fundamental right" of women to kill their children? How many churches and seminaries will face crippling civil judgments and have to close?

It can happen here. It is about to happen here.

Unless we obey our worthless officers, and fire on the mob. With all that in mind, I'm endorsing Tsar Nicholas II - er, John McCain - this November 4.

Article URL: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/nicholas_ii_for_tsar/
« Last Edit: October 30, 2008, 04:25:36 AM by Religious Dick »
I speak of civil, social man under law, and no other.
-Sir Edmund Burke

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Nicholas II for Tsar
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2008, 12:33:12 AM »
Oh man.....


Bush is Czar Nicolous?


He isn't even unsuccessfull at all.

I don't get the comparison .

Nor does the mob of stupes need to be shot , just outvoted.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Nicholas II for Tsar
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2008, 12:35:59 AM »
Yeah, sure. The mob is gonna kill all the innocent fetuses.

This has nothing to do with persecuting anyone.

You have put up a ton of crap on this forum, but this is the stupidest ever.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Cynthia

  • Guest
Re: Nicholas II for Tsar
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2008, 02:11:26 AM »
Nicholas II for Tsar
Posted by John Zmirak on October 28, 2008

On February 25, 1917, Russian soldiers serving Tsar Nicholas II in St. Petersburg faced a choice. On November 4, 2008, Americans voters will stand in the same position. They must choose between a crooked, bumbling oligarchy prone to starting futile wars?and a ravening, reckless mob. While it?s mostly made up of citizens rightly enraged, the mob is led (or will soon be led) by vicious ideologues who promise to persecute Christianity. (Be patient, I will explain.)

There is no third living option, no better Tsar ready to reign. That option was tried, has failed. If the soldiers fight to save the Tsar, they preserve a regime that sent their brothers to die without meaning, without rifles?in a faraway land, for lies. They will save the elite that let the monk Rasputin set national policy, which bankrupted and bled their Fatherland. Surely, the new men grabbing for power must be better. How could they be worse?

The mob is shoving through the snowy square, chanting and screaming, blood already on its hands. The officers?fat men who?ve never missed a meal or seen the front?are rushing up and down the line, urging soldiers to follow orders. Their moustaches are immaculately groomed, but they quiver. For the first time in their military careers, these men really are afraid. The mob is 1,000 feet away. Now 500 feet, and charging. You hear the order: ?FIRE!? What do you do?

This cheerful scene is what faces American voters next week. I needn?t remind most readers how badly the Tsarist party has governed. Or point out that the new heirs to the throne are clustered with Rasputins. If we turn back the insurgents at the gate, the old guard will chuckle and muddle right along, slowly wrecking the country.

What happens if the radicals win? If we join the mob, or support a hapless pretender (in some third party) and fire into the air?

I?ll tell you one thing, just one, that will happen, if Barak Obama is elected with a large Congressional majority?with perhaps enough votes in the Senate to quash a filibuster. And that one thing should be enough.

Senator Obama has promised to sign the so-called ?Freedom of Choice Act,? which would repeal every restriction on abortion in every American state, right up through the ninth month. But then, we knew that about Barack, the whole infanticide thing.

There?s more. The FOC Act raises abortion to (in its own words) a ?fundamental right.? According to legal analysts at the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops, the act?s language is so sweeping that it will snuff out any state?s ?conscience? clause?the laws allowing hospitals, doctors, and nurses not to take part in abortions. To do so would amount to illegal discrimination, denying a citizen her fundamental right. Christian hospitals could no more decline to perform abortions than they can currently refuse to operate on black people.

So President Obama and his congressional supermajority would force every Christian hospital, doctor, or nurse either to abandon their faith, or go out of business. By federal law, believing Christians would be banned from a major industry (and apostolate). This is literally equivalent to a law banning faithful Jews from owning newspapers.

History tells us that steps such as this aren?t where religious persecutions end. It?s where they begin. Things are already scary enough in neighboring Canada, where Christians are now routinely hauled up before human rights tribunals for repeating what the Bible teaches concerning sex. Who knows what some Obama-appointed judge, 20 years from now, will make of a pastor whose sermons attacked the ?fundamental right? of women to kill their children? How many churches and seminaries will face crippling civil judgments and have to close?

It can happen here. It is about to happen here.

Unless we obey our worthless officers, and fire on the mob. With all that in mind, I?m endorsing Tsar Nicholas II?er, John McCain?this November 4.
Article URL: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/nicholas_ii_for_tsar/


What a fabulous article, Religous Dick.

Thank you.

Cindy

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Nicholas II for Tsar
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2008, 03:02:51 AM »
Fabulous as in fable.

Tsar Nicolas was not only a despot, but a major dolt and a wimp to boot. I don't think he is a good role model for a hero at all.
=====================
Remember, he destroyed his country to defend what? The Serbs, who sent a guy to assassinate Franz Ferdinand, against the Austrians?

He was actually defending an act of terrorism, wasn't he?

Hardly sounds like good judgment to me.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Religious Dick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1153
  • Drunk, drunk, drunk in the gardens and the graves
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Nicholas II for Tsar
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2008, 04:27:28 AM »


You have put up a ton of crap on this forum, but this is the stupidest ever.



I like it. In fact, I like it so well I'm going to bump it so you can enjoy it for another 24 hrs. or so.... ;D
I speak of civil, social man under law, and no other.
-Sir Edmund Burke