Seems unlikely that this woman was intentionally flouting the law or operateing in bad faith.
If this woman looses her case and draws a ruinous penalty , could that cool business for e-Bay?
E-bay has a dog in this fight , they ought to provide their own lawyer to help defend this customer and use what clout they have to get this law amended , if they don't this case could become famous and reduce the e-bay sellers pool.
And if the e-bay sellers pool is reduced, who stands to gain?
Your question has me stumped.
Seems like a loss for anyone involved with e-bay, and a win nowhere.
The smaller the pool, the more customers set free to purchase elsewhere.
Would you think that many corporations, oh hell, just say companies, would find e-bay a place of competition?
In most towns in America, you find a thrift shop. The stipulation for a thrift shop to get a license is that it must be controlled by a non-profit organization, which means people like Salvation Army and the other ones, many Catholic.
Try to get a license for a thrift shop without one, though. It is possible, but it would take first-cousin clout.
A local county commissioner I asked looked at me like I was, to borrow a Rich term, manic; "hell, these business people in this town are my friends. I go to church with many of them."
See, no bargain stores, or they might compete with other businesses.
Especially now since those various dollar stores, which are big corporations, and who have NO trouble getting the permits, are all over your little town.
That money goes out of town and overseas to China, and the locals get the four minimum wage jobs. That is what Republicans can 'growing jobs.'
I think there are a lot of business people who would like to see e-bay gone. Every time somebody buys a used goodie on e-bay, a local business gets to keep the new one on the shelf.