Author Topic: Presidential Neglect  (Read 2071 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Presidential Neglect
« on: October 14, 2006, 07:24:03 PM »
Presidential Neglect
by Charley Reese

The president concentrated so hard on the two members of his infamous "axis of evil" that didn't have nuclear weapons that he neglected the one that does. North Korea announced that it would test a nuclear weapon, and now it has done so.

I'm sure the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il, said, "Woe is me" when he heard such words as "provocative" and "unacceptable" tossed at him as if words were weapons. By the way, how can a fact be unacceptable? The fact exists whether the president likes it or not.

It's a good idea not to call anything unacceptable that you aren't prepared to prevent, and, of course, the president was not prepared to prevent the nuclear test. I seriously hope he didn't believe that mere words would deter the North Koreans.

A nuclear-armed North Korea represents a failure of American diplomacy. For the sake of fairness, it should be said that the most skilled diplomats in the world might have failed to dissuade the North Koreans from pursuing nuclear weapons. The president's stumblebum, lead-footed style of diplomacy, however, virtually guaranteed that the North Koreans would develop nuclear weapons.

For example, he included North Korea in his stupid axis of evil, a phrase coined by David Frum, a fanatic neoconservative who at the time was a White House speechwriter. Next Bush announces a U.S. policy of preemptive wars. He tells the whole world, "You're either with us or against us."

He then proceeds to launch two pre-emptive wars, on Afghanistan and Iraq. Even as he remains bogged down in those two countries, he launches a verbal war against Iran. At the same time, his so-called negotiations with North Korea had been reduced to threats and demands.

Well, if you were North Korea's "Dear Leader," what would you conclude? The logical conclusion is that the U.S. eventually plans to attack North Korea. The best deterrence against that is to have nuclear weapons. The North Korean leader might strike us as odd or even comical, but he's not stupid. Nobody who can survive in the midst of all those grim-faced generals is stupid.

Diplomacy is not molecular biology. It is simply negotiations. The first mistake Bush made was to include Japan. Koreans, North and South, hate Japan because its half-century occupation of the Korean peninsula was so brutal. Bush should have asked Japan to sit out the negotiation process.

Russia, China and South Korea are the three countries most likely to have influence with North Korea. Working closely with these countries, Bush should have presented the North Koreans with a menu of incentives and disincentives. Instead, he refused everything they asked for, such as one-on-one talks and a security guarantee, and simply made threats.

Well, North Korea has called the president's bluff. Other than bluster, the president is not going to do anything. Even without nukes, North Korea is a little dragon with a lot of very sharp teeth. A military attack on North Korea would unleash a blood bath involving scores of thousands of casualties.

One view of history is that it is a record of political leaders making decisions. If they are smart and make good decisions, good things happen. If they are stupid and make bad decisions, then disasters can befall innocent people.

We have elected ourselves a president who is not very smart when it comes to foreign affairs and, even worse, seems to have no real interest in them. Instead of seeking wise counsel, he has surrounded himself with neoconservative ideologues who think the U.S. can bully the rest of the world into doing what they want it to do.

I'll be glad when he retires to Crawford, Texas, and I'm reasonably sure the rest of the world will feel the same way. In the meantime, nuclear nonproliferation is a dead issue.
 
http://www.antiwar.com/reese/?articleid=9861
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Presidential Neglect
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2006, 07:45:53 PM »
   Why is a Nuclear Korea seen as a US failure?

   This is a success of North Korean Diplomacy and science.

    North Korean Diplomats kept US and other diplomats busy talking while North Korean scientists were busy building the bomb.
    On our side,what sort of diplomacy was not tried?

    The failure that I see is the failure of North Korea to feed itself , they can afford to be the best armed people in the world per capata , but they cannot stave off famine.

Mucho

  • Guest
Re: Presidential Neglect
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2006, 01:42:06 AM »
   Why is a Nuclear Korea seen as a US failure?

   This is a success of North Korean Diplomacy and science.

    North Korean Diplomats kept US and other diplomats busy talking while North Korean scientists were busy building the bomb.
    On our side,what sort of diplomacy was not tried?

    The failure that I see is the failure of North Korea to feed itself , they can afford to be the best armed people in the world per capata , but they cannot stave off famine.
A nuclear No Korea is seen as a Bushfailure because it is. Direct talks were held and they did not have Nukes then . The Bushidiot wanted to insult, intimidate and not talk and now they do.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Presidential Neglect
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2006, 02:15:39 AM »
Quote
The Bushidiot wanted to insult, intimidate and not talk and now they do.

Gorbachev disagrees:
Unable to extricate itself from its Cold War mentality, the United States was playing a dwindling role in world politics, while Russia, China, Brazil, Europe, India and Japan were becoming stronger, Gorbachev said.

North Korea, which said on Monday it had successfully completed a nuclear test, was an example. Only China and Russia were in a position to handle Pyongyang, he said.

Washington will in future have to act less on its own and get used to a position of diminished importance, he said.

"The Americans will have to understand that in future they will have to cooperate and make decisions jointly, instead of just always wanting to give orders," Gorbachev said.

In the N. Korea talks Russia, China, S. Korea and Japan were involved in the regional talks along with the US.

If the talks were a failure they were a failure of multilateral diplomacy. Funny thing is talks with Iran were multilateral also.

The other factor to remember is that N. Korea violated the terms of the unilateral talks that you deem a success.

Which begs the question,  what good are agreements, either unilateral or multilateral,  if the accords are not followed?





sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: DIHD....DIHD't
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2006, 03:55:06 AM »
IT'S JUST FASCINATING TO WATCH THIS APPROACH TO CRITICISING ANYTHING BUSH.  WHEN IT'S IRAQ, IT'S THAT WE DIDN'T APPROACH IT FROM A MULTINATIONAL ANGLE, DIDN'T HAVE THE UN TAKE THE LEAD.  WITH NORTH KOREA WE DO PRECISELY THAT, AND HE'S CONDEMNED FOR NOT TAKING THIS ON 1 ON 1, NOT DEALING WITH NORTH KOREA DIRECTLY.  IF IT WASN'T SO TRANSPARENTLY PATHETIC, IT'D BE LAUGHABLE      :P
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Presidential Neglect
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2006, 04:21:33 AM »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle