<<And, actually, they didn't "auction off the oil resources" - Iraq retains ownership of the oil, they were bidding on the charges to extract the oil. As the article states: "Russia's Lukoil, CNPC, and RoyalDutchShell accepted fees of between $1.15 and $1.40 for every barrel they produce" - that's what the company will be paid for each barrel they extract, with the balance of the sale price going to the Iraqi government. >>
That is auctioning off the oil resources. Pre-invasion, all the profits went to the Iraqi government, now they are shared with foreigners who bid for their shares at auctions. Where is the actual contract printed? I will bet that there is plenty of fine print giving the foreigners all of their "expenses" and "costs" in getting the oil up for sale - - "costs" and "expenses" that as defined by them and by them alone will enable them to recover much more than the $1.40 per barrel mentioned as fees.
These deals are highly complex. A summary such as the one you quoted is virtually meaningless. The list of auction winners and losers is still nowhere to be seen, and its absence from the MSM in itself is highly meaningful.
<<Several of the oil fields were also reserved for future development, but the Iraqi government has already said that they will reserve those for development by their own domestic industry.>>
They can say anything they like, they can even say they are independent and sovereign, but we all know better. The decision to hold fields in reserve was probably that of the big oil companies, not anxious to flood the market with more product at this time, jockeying for maximum price when the fields are opened. When those fields go into production, we'll see which group of foreigners is awarded the concession.