Author Topic: COINTELPRO  (Read 2528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
COINTELPRO
« on: May 26, 2008, 10:11:33 PM »
   [I realize this article is 2 years old but I had never heard of this story before.]
     
Published on Wednesday, March 8, 2006 by the Los Angeles Times

A Break-In to End All Break-Ins
In 1971, stolen FBI files exposed the government's domestic spying program.
by Allan M. Jalon
 

Thirty-five years ago today, a group of anonymous activists broke into the small, two-man office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Media, Pa., and stole more than 1,000 FBI documents that revealed years of systematic wiretapping, infiltration and media manipulation designed to suppress dissent.

The Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI, as the group called itself, forced its way in at night with a crowbar while much of the country was watching the Muhammad Ali-Joe Frazier fight. When agents arrived for work the next morning, they found the file cabinets virtually emptied.

Within a few weeks, the documents began to show up ? mailed anonymously in manila envelopes with no return address ? in the newsrooms of major American newspapers. When the Washington Post received copies, Atty. Gen. John N. Mitchell asked Executive Editor Ben Bradlee not to publish them because disclosure, he said, could "endanger the lives" of people involved in investigations on behalf of the United States.

Nevertheless, the Post broke the first story on March 24, 1971, after receiving an envelope with 14 FBI documents detailing how the bureau had enlisted a local police chief, letter carriers and a switchboard operator at Swarthmore College to spy on campus and black activist groups in the Philadelphia area.

More documents went to other reporters ? Tom Wicker received copies at his New York Times office; so did reporters at the Los Angeles Times ? and to politicians including Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota and Rep. Parren J. Mitchell of Maryland.

To this day, no individual has claimed responsibility for the break-in. The FBI, after building up a six-year, 33,000-page file on the case, couldn't solve it. But it remains one of the most lastingly consequential (although underemphasized) watersheds of political awareness in recent American history, one that poses tough questions even today for our national leaders who argue that fighting foreign enemies requires the government to spy on its citizens. The break-in is far less well known than Daniel Ellsberg's leak of the Pentagon Papers three months later, but in my opinion it deserves equal stature.

Found among the Media documents was a new word, "COINTELPRO," short for the FBI's "secret counterintelligence program," created to investigate and disrupt dissident political groups in the U.S. Under these programs, beginning in 1956, the bureau worked to "enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles," as one COINTELPRO memo put it, "to get the point across there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox."

The Media documents ? along with further revelations about COINTELPRO in the months and years that followed ? made it clear that the bureau had gone beyond mere intelligence-gathering to discredit, destabilize and demoralize groups ? many of them peaceful, legal civil rights organizations and antiwar groups ? that the FBI and Director J. Edgar Hoover found offensive or threatening.

For instance, agents sought to persuade Martin Luther King Jr. to kill himself just before he received the Nobel Prize. They sent him a composite tape made from bugs planted illegally in his hotel rooms when he was entertaining women other than his wife ? and threatened to make it public. "King, there is one thing left for you to do. You know what it is," FBI operatives wrote in their anonymous letter.

Under COINTELPRO, the bureau also targeted actress Jean Seberg for having made a donation to the Black Panther Party. The fragile actress ultimately committed suicide after a gossip nugget based on a FBI wiretap was leaked to the L.A. Times and published. The item, suggesting that the father of the baby she was carrying was a Black Panther rather than her French writer-husband, turned out to be wrong.

The sheer reach of a completely politicized FBI was one of the most frightening revelations of the Media documents. Underground newspapers were targeted. Students (and their professors) were targeted. Celebrities were targeted. The Communist Party of the U.S.A., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Student Non-Violent Organizing Committee, the Black Panther Party, the Women's Strike for Peace ? all were targeted. "Neutralize them in the same manner they are trying to destroy and neutralize the U.S.," one memo said.

Eventually, the COINTELPRO memos ? some from Media and some unearthed later ? prompted hearings led by Rep. Don Edwards of California and by Sen. Frank Church of Idaho on intelligence agency abuses. In the mid-1970s, the wayward agency began finally to be reined in.

It is tragic when people lose faith in their government to the extent that they feel they must break laws to expose corruption.

But a war that had been started and sustained by lies had gone on for years. And a government had betrayed its citizens, manipulating their fear to strengthen its grip on power.

Today, again, many people worry that their government may be on the road to subverting its own ideals. I hope that the commemoration of those unknown activists being held today in Media, Pa., will serve as a reminder that fighting for democracy abroad must remain more than merely an excuse to weaken civil liberties at home.

Allan M. Jalon is a longtime contributor to The Times and other publications on issues of culture and media.

? 2006 Los Angeles Times

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0308-27.htm
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2008, 10:30:11 PM »
Those same tecniques were used on the KKK , this ought to be mentioned.


Quote
for our national leaders who argue that fighting foreign enemies requires the government to spy on its citizens.

Who?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2008, 07:19:31 AM »
for our national leaders who argue that fighting foreign enemies requires the government to spy on its citizens.

Who?

===============================
One particular national leader that claims this is Juniorbush. Dick Cheney would be another.
He wants the telephone companies to be immune from prosecution for permitting the various agencies to spy on US citizens.

Surely you know this.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2008, 08:12:09 AM »
for our national leaders who argue that fighting foreign enemies requires the government to spy on its citizens.

Who?

===============================
One particular national leader that claims this is Juniorbush. Dick Cheney would be another.
He wants the telephone companies to be immune from prosecution for permitting the various agencies to spy on US citizens.

Surely you know this.


No , I have never heard that these wanted to spy more on US citizens , not more than usual anyhow.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2008, 10:27:42 AM »
No , I have never heard that these wanted to spy more on US citizens , not more than usual anyhow.

====================
You are deaf, in that case. He wants to spy on everyone, enlist your phone company in the spying, and do it without a warrant or any evidence that you have been spied upon. He has said so, publicly and repeatedly, and no other US president has ever done so.

If there is no record that anyone has been spied upon and no penalty or having done so, naturally there will be no way of comparing what has been done under Juniorbush with what has been done with previous or future presidents. You have no way of determining whether there is more or less spying, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO RECORDS KEPT AND NO PENALTY.

So your belief is akin to a belief in the Tooth Fairy or the Great Pumpkin.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2008, 06:46:25 AM »
No , I have never heard that these wanted to spy more on US citizens , not more than usual anyhow.

====================
You are deaf, in that case. He wants to spy on everyone, enlist your phone company in the spying, and do it without a warrant or any evidence that you have been spied upon. He has said so, publicly and repeatedly, and no other US president has ever done so.

If there is no record that anyone has been spied upon and no penalty or having done so, naturally there will be no way of comparing what has been done under Juniorbush with what has been done with previous or future presidents. You have no way of determining whether there is more or less spying, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO RECORDS KEPT AND NO PENALTY.

So your belief is akin to a belief in the Tooth Fairy or the Great Pumpkin.


Your beleif is just your opinion because,You have no way of determining whether there is more or less spying, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO RECORDS KEPT AND NO PENALTY.So your belief is akin to a belief in the Tooth Fairy or the Great Pumpkin.


Thanks that saved me a lot of typing. I appreaciate your pointing out that there is no reason to think that spying has increased other than the repitition of the party talking points.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2008, 09:10:00 AM »
Your beleif is just your opinion because,You have no way of determining whether there is more or less spying, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO RECORDS KEPT AND NO PENALTY.So your belief is akin to a belief in the Tooth Fairy or the Great Pumpkin.

===================================================================
Suppose someone passed a law making it possible for someone to break into your house, look around and take anything they wanted with no penalty, and you, being both blind and deaf, would therefore have no awareness of whether or not your premises had been violated, or if anything was taken, and if it was, there were no records kept and no evidence provided.

I am sure that this would be a motive for any normal person to oppose such a law. And it is precisely such a law that Juniorbush wants passed.

How hard would it be to require the government to at least keep records of its spying? Why should we not have a right for the telephone companies that we pay for our service be prevented from ratting us out and providing access to our every conversation to government spies?

Keep in mind that some one you think you trust, such as Juniorbush, will not always be in charge of the spying. Eventually left-wing Liberals, OSHA agents and sinister people with unmarked black helicopters will be in charge of  spying on you.

Keep in mind that eventually some corrupt official might spy on you and sell your financial data to scam artists, who will know exactly what words are needed to convince you to invest in their bogus scams.

I suggest that unless you trust every conceivable politician that is or ever will be in the future to be trustworthy and honest and having your best interests at heart, there is zero reason to approve of Juniorbush's bill allowing secret spying on you.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2008, 12:38:55 PM »
What law are we talking about?

The Blindness you are tlaking about has always been the case , why should we beleave that the FBI file misuse proven to have gone on in the Clinton White house was not just the tip of the iceberg?

There isn't any reason to suppose that spying on American citizens has increased in any respect.

Nor has there been a real offer to reduce same from any present canadate.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2008, 02:27:44 PM »
Being as the Department of Homeland Security has a far larger budget than its predecessors did before 9-11, it is reasonable to assume that they are doing proportionally greater amount of spying.

This is impossible to know, because they claim that no records are kept because none need be kept. The present administration's refusal to keep records is deliberately so they

I do not think that this is a non-issue just because the candidates have chosen not to address it. My personal privacy is always important to me. A lot more important than such on-issues as whether Rev. Wright is a buddy of Minister Farrakhan, or who might be a member of the ACLU, or voter fraud.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COINTELPRO
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2008, 04:16:46 PM »
Being as the Department of Homeland Security has a far larger budget than its predecessors did before 9-11, it is reasonable to assume that they are doing proportionally greater amount of spying.

This is impossible to know, because they claim that no records are kept because none need be kept. The present administration's refusal to keep records is deliberately so they

I do not think that this is a non-issue just because the candidates have chosen not to address it. My personal privacy is always important to me. A lot more important than such on-issues as whether Rev. Wright is a buddy of Minister Farrakhan, or who might be a member of the ACLU, or voter fraud.



The Department of Homeland security pays the salary of a lot of airport baggage screeners , who used to pay that?

There is no case to be made then ,that there is even a slight reason to beleive that there is any more spying on American citizens than previous ?

Greater paranoia , not counting that is.