Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Brassmask

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18
226
3DHS / BT: Jackson Baker Thinks You Could Be Right
« on: November 09, 2006, 05:17:19 PM »
The honorable Mr. Baker gives some weight to the idea that liberals may have been so discontent as to have affected Ford's race. Is it possible? The implications are daunting.

This is THE political reporter for Memphis. 

Quote
Right up to the end, Ford was routinely being described by those pundits who were hazarding election forecasts as having run this year's best campaign. But that surely was a paradox: In the year of a roaring Democratic tide, with personal gifts that were undeniable and with coverage of his race with Corker devoted disproportionately to him, how indeed could Ford have lost?

One clue, perhaps, was the debate that raged amongst progressive bloggers in Memphis. It narrowed down to the following choices: Hold your nose and vote for Ford, whose politics had gone conspicuously rightward; vote for a fringe candidate of the left, such as the Green Party's Chris Lugo; desist from voting in the Senate race altogether; or, as a fourth alternative that came to be increasingly taken seriously, vote for Corker.

http://memphisflyer.com/memphis/Content?oid=oid%3A21632

227
3DHS / Election Rundown '06
« on: November 09, 2006, 02:02:20 PM »
(This is crossposted at my site, http://www.brassmask.com/news.php)

Election Rundown '06

on Thursday 09 November 2006 - 12:02:40 | by Brassmask

My reactions to the elections were varied so I wanted to take a day to absorb it all and let the feelgoods sink in. Here's where I wound up.
*This is going to jump around a bit. My apologies*


The Winners

Steve Cohen - Hands down, the happiest I've been to see someone elected in Memphis ever. Total class. Played along with the Ford machine and let them hang themselves. I never heard one negative word out his mouth about his opponent (Mark White) and the loser (Jake Ford) that showed up to all the debates and made himself an ass before Memphians. While others were busily spending millions to try and make rednecks love them, Steve Cohen just came out, spoke the truth and brought people together. His last ad was probably the only advertisement by a politician that ever worked on me. I think it had something to do with the way he was actually sincere. Absolutely brilliant.

Memphis - Other than Ophelia's landslide, no surprises there, the Fords lost. Without their solid power within the local Democratic Party, it may be possible to enact change and really set Memphis on the path to political recovery and effective leadership.

Democrats - Well, that's really a no-brainer, right? The Senate and the House. Governorships across the country. Statehouses across the country. What did Bush say? "It was a thumping". Yeah, that sums it up.

Howard Dean - I had a snippet post yesterday. Rahm Emanuel is acting like he was the Democrats Karl Rove and that he did it all. But behind the MSM, there is an overall consensus that Chairman of the DNC, Howard Dean is the person who deserves nearly all the credit. His "50 State Strategy" called for Democrats to leave no seat unchallenged and it paid off. In spades. By actually targeting states like Idaho, Montana and Virginia and not just writing them off as Schumer and Emanuel wanted to do going into it, the Dems rocked the nation's vote. It will come as no surprise to anyone who reads this blog that I think Dean hung the moon ('cause I'm pretty sure I've read somewhere that, in fact, he actually DID hang it. Maybe on Wikipedia), but I really can't articulate how proud I am of his accomplishments and level-headed leadership.

The Weasels - They keep showing this clip of Schumer, Emanuel, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid holding each others' hands in the air and doing a victory dance. It makes me want to vomit at times. The four of them held Dean at arm's length and actively worked to continue the lie that he was a loudmouth who didn't make policy and was indicative on the fringe left's growing power. Now, they're reaping benefits he had a huge hand in sowing. And what's they're thanks for him? Not one mention of his name that I've seen. Yesterday, The Today Show spent 8 minutes talking to a jubilant Emanuel at the top of the show.

Pelosi gets to be first woman speaker of the house. Good for her. Reid gets Majority Leader. (I think that's what it is.) Good for him. And that's if Lieberman and Sanders actually caucus with the Dems like they promised. We'll see.

Markos Moulitsas of DailyKos - The activism on that site had a huge impact on the Democrats. He called a lot of the races correctly.

Bloggers (including me) - The Ford/Corker race was the topic for me in the last few months. It boggled my mind that progressives were going to sell their souls to put a guy in office who actively decried them and held little to no consensus with them on the issues. The idea those people had was that any D was better than any R. Fair enough. The whole thing could be boiled down (and was by some of us) as Substance vs Strategy.

We all got lucky. The Dems took back the Senate without Ford. Personally, I think we all win. Those who feared not winning the Senate back because of strategy and those of us who feared that Ford would not vote with us on the important bills. Win/win. (There will be those, I'm sure, when we're done cuddling, that will say we could have had one more seat or something, butthat's neither here nor there today.)

The other win was that bloggers found that politicians, whether they will acknowledge it or not, pay attention to the buzz of the blogosphere. I remember well-known bloggers saying they would get phone calls from people about posts. That never happened to me, of course, but I know it did to others. But the fact that they do listen and get angry proves that we have influence. That's a good thing.

America - Yay, us! Bush kicks Rummy out after "thumping".



The Losers

Harold Ford, Jr - And here's why.


(5%)Racism - Do I think racism lives in TN? Of course, I do. I don't have to look any further than members of my own family. Do I think that Tennesseeans just couldn't bring themselves to vote for a "colored"? Some yes. Overall, no way.

(20%)His family - I don't know the numbers for Shelby County but I bet that HF Sr and Jake Ford shaved a lot of votes off of Jr. Racism is an ugly thing. Stupidity and ignorance are ugly. Corruption is ugly. And the idea that a seat belongs to one certain family is just crazy. Add in John Ford's corruption and you have a situation where everyone is going to be wondering Jr is like his family and they're going to watch for him to appear to be a "Ford".

Showing up at the opponent's press conference is something a "Ford" would do.

(0.5%)Progressives - I have no illusions that there is silent majority of progressives in TN who just couldn't bring themselves to bother to vote for Ford; but I do think there were some.

(4.5%)Fake Republican - I said it over and over again: "When offered a Repub and a fake Repub, Repub's will pick the real one every time. This was the major point for me but I know it wasn't for some on the left. I bet it was the decider for most Republicans in Tennesee though.

(10%)God talk - Someone pointed out that Jr would say that he was a christian all the time but then rabidly defended his going to a Playboy party. That don't play well with the Jesus freaks. Plus it makes a lot of us liberals think of how the right has used that schtick for the last six years and it sounds like Bush-talk. Yuck.

(30%)Supported Bush - He's on the tv bragging about voting for the Patriot Act (TWICE!) and then saying that he's the agent of change. He told people they needed to support Bush in the "war of terror" and as we all know, this election is shaping up to be a referendum on Bush and his war. Come on, guy.

(20%)Negative Ads - Not from Ford. No, he had agents who did it for him but not directly from him. But also, the negative ads from Corker helped some too. I really forget sometimes that there are people who actually pay attention to ads. There was a woman on the local news last night who said that she thought of a certain ad and it made her vote a certain way when she got to the screen. (sidenote - I didn't make a big deal out of it but I never considered that "Hey, Harold" ad racist. And I think it hurt Harold Ford more than it hurt Corker. The wild-eyed reaction of racism by the Dems reminded me of the way Sharpton and Jackson kind of get crazy about things to make a big deal and try to get some "hand" as Seinfeld would say.)

(10%) Hypocrisy - A lot of this is cumulative from all the other things. It kind of builds up like those percentages of pennies they talk about in Office Space. You don't really see it till it's this gigantic pile of it right in front of you.


GOP - Good enough.

"Moderates" - That's code for the conservatives/republicans who just, for whatever reason, can't make the jump to the GOP. They like Hillary. They like Lieberman. They LOVED Kerry from the get-go in '04 and they thought Howard Dean was just nuts. They believe that "The Scream" proves Dean was nuts. "Moderates" pulled for Ford and talked about being "grown ups" and they thought "strategy" in TN was more important than substance. Well, Ford lost, so what have we learned here?

We'll never know if a clearer choice between Kurita and Corker would have won the seat. Me? I'm thinking that it definitely would but what's the point of arguing it? Shoulda, coulda, woulda. Onward and upward. (yes, I know she was moderate but she wouldn't have had to fight that uphill battle of "I won't let them make me something I'm not!" and she could have gone a little left in the campaign but we're not arguing this.)

Voters - Touchscreens have to go. I check DailyKos Tuesday morning and it was lit up with reports from across the country of the things just screwing everyone. I don't know what the answer is but it ain't these things. My feelings on the election are dampened by the idea that it isn't provable. I don't trust the process implicitly. We can find a better way.

But the biggest loser of all was W - I couldn't be happier to see him having his ass handed to him.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Personal Overview: My overall reaction is positive. The new blood coming in is exciting and the fact that the Dems are in control of one whole branch of the government makes me a little less afraid. I still have reservations about the Dems though because so many of them were lazy or afraid and didn't do enough to stop the GOP's outrages over the last few years. So, I'm a little wary and a little hopeful.

Locally, as I said, I couldn't be happier that a true progressive is going to take Ford's place in Congress. That's a personal win for me. As for Ford, I feel nothing about that race because a Republican won who was running against a fake Republican. I feel nothing.

It's been a real honor to have bloggers I respect link to my site and allowing me to participate in their comments sections even when I was at my most caustic and ineloquent. My thanks to LeftWingCracker, West TN Liberal, Freedonian, Autoegocrat, Desi Franklin, Egalia at TN Guerilla Women, PeskyFly, Brad Watkins and everyone else who inspire me to be involved by being out there blogging and actually doing stuff .

I look forward to new discussions and new campaigns and new debates and new knockdown-dragouts.

So, anyway, that's my rundown of the '06 elections. On to getting Gore RE-elected in '08*.

*(Don't start with me. I mean it. Now, LOOK! Al Gore speaks for me on nearly EVERY issue! A Gore/Dean ticket would totally rock this country's world! Shut up! He's a god. They both are! And you know it!)


 



228
3DHS / Ed Bradley of 60 Minutes Dies
« on: November 09, 2006, 01:40:03 PM »
http://www.wmctv.com/Global/story.asp?S=5656500

Quote
NEW YORK (AP) - Ed Bradley, a correspondent for "60 Minutes" since 1981, has died, CBS News announced Thursday.

Bradley died Thursday of leukemia at New York's Mount Sinai Hospital. He was 65.

The 2005-06 season of "60 Minutes" marked Bradley's 25th year with the groundbreaking, critically hailed CBS news magazine.

Bradley collected 19 Emmys, the most recent for a segment on the reopening of the racially motivated murder case of Emmett Till.

(Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


Occassionally, a well-known person dies and I'm just looking at the screen stunned.  When John Ritter died, I just couldn't believe it when I heard.  And now, here's what I can only call one of the coolest cats on television suddenly dead.  How could this be?  Leukemia?  I had no idea.

Terrible, terrible news.

229
3DHS / Rahm Emanuel Can Go To Hell
« on: November 08, 2006, 03:41:54 PM »
Rahm Emanuel Can Go To Hell
He's spent the whole day taking credit for something that he didn't do. That he actively OPPOSED.

There is only one person in the Democratic Party who made the right choices. Only one person who set the strategy and made it happen and left no seat unchallenged.

And Rahm Emanuel is not this guy's name.



Rahm Emanuel's choices lost overwhelmingly. Chuck Schumer's hand picked candidate in Tennessee lost. They had better start polishing up their resume's. If I have anything to do with it, they will be no longer be in charge of the Democratic Party's candidate process very soon.

230
3DHS / Ford is losing
« on: November 07, 2006, 11:04:13 PM »
This has nothing to do with Ford losing.

Sirs will hate it.  I think that Michael will like it.

If you know the words to FREEDOM '90 by George Michael is about ten times better.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/11/06/youtube-agent-of-democra_e_33418.html

231
3DHS / My God, The GOP is Full of Bastards
« on: November 06, 2006, 06:50:58 PM »
This is beyond the pale.  Republicans should root the a-holes who set this up and make sure they are prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Absolutely unconscionable indeed.

(But I'm sure RR and sirs or perhaps even BT will have some article somewhere that claims that Clinton did the same thing in '96 or some bullshit so they don't have to take responsibility for their team's extreme dedication to lies and deceit and felony.)

VA-Sen: Voter suppression in Virginia
by kos
Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 04:01:07 PM CST
Republicans are so afraid to run on their merits that they continue to resort to dirty tricks.

Listen to this robocall (.WAV) being sent to Virginia voters:



Tim Daly from Clarendon got a call saying that if he votes Tuesday, he will be arrested.  A recording of his voicemail can be found online at: www.webbforsenate.com/media/phone_message.wav

The transcript from his voicemail reads:

"This message is for Timothy Daly.  This is the Virginia Elections Commission. We've determined you are registered in New York to vote. Therefore, you will not be allowed to cast your vote on Tuesday. If you do show up, you will be charged criminally."

Daly has been registered to vote in Virginia since 1998, and he has voted for the last several cycles with no problem. He has filed a criminal complaint with the Commonwealth's attorney in Arlington.



More from the Webb campaign (from an email):



Widespread Calls, Allegedly from "Webb Volunteers," Telling Voters that their Polling Location has Changed.

A couple of examples:

a.  Norman Cox has been registered to vote in the same location in Arlington since 1972.  Someone from a 406 number (in Montana) called to tell him that his polling place has changed. [Note: The Webb Campaign is NOT making any such phone calls.]  Cox said he believed that he was being mislead and the caller hung up.

b. Peter Baumann in Cape Charles, VA (North Hampton) got a similar call from a "Webb volunteer" saying his polling location had changed. He said: No, I'm a poll worker and I know where I vote. The girl--who was calling from California--hung up.

The Secretary of the State Board of Elections Jean Jensen has logged dozens of similar calls, finding heavy trends in Accomack County (middle peninsula) and Essex County (outer peninsula) [as reported by the counties' registrars].

3) Fliers in Buckingham County Say "SKIP THIS ELECTION" (paid for by the RNC) have caused many in the African American community to call the Board of Elections to see if the election is still on. The full tag line says: "SKIP THIS ELECTION... (and then in smaller print): Don't Let the Tax and Spend Liberals Win."

4) Voter Machine Problems.

a. On many ballots in heavily Democratic neighborhoods, Jim's name is cut off. The ballots say: "James H. (Jim)" with no Webb.

b. New reports that ballots in Essex County have Jim's name split on 2 pages.  The "James H (Jim)" on one page, "Webb" on the next.

c. Reports of voting machines in Isle of White that do not provide a clear image of the ballot, making voting a challenge.



Voting issues need to be a foremost priority in the next Congress. This is unconscionable.

And the best solution, by far, is still the Oregon vote-by-mail model.


232
3DHS / GOP Laying Groundwork For Stealing Elections
« on: November 06, 2006, 01:56:27 PM »
Spinning the Exit Polls Early
The RNC just sent out detailed talking points about how unreliable exit polls have been over the past several elections. The key arguments are that exits polls typically have a Democratic bias and have wrongly predicted Democratic victories in recent years.

According to a source, the RNC expects leaked exit polls to show Democratic victories and do not want the news to discourage Republican voters from going to the polls late in the day.

http://www.politicalwire.com/

Sure, they say they're trying to encourage Reps to come out but come on, they are just telling everyone that the exit polls are unsound so that when they steal the elections, people on the right (that cultish 35% that includes sirs) will be pre-disposed to start in about how polls are unsound and they'll convince themselves that the media was just hyping the Dems to demoralize the right.  (When it could easily be stated that the media has been hyping the Dems so that people on the left will think its in the bag and they really don't have to go out and vote.)

I'm sure there are going to be shockers and very suspicious wins.  I expect Senator ManDog will win his race even though all polls show he is down by 10 to 20 points.

By the way, Markos Moulitsas made his predictions.

I hope he's right about Tennessee.

http://www.dailykos.com/

Prediction thread
by kos
Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 11:32:05 AM CST
Here are my predictions. Note, for the record, that I've been way off on my predictions the past two cycles. So there's no particular wisdom or inside knowledge or track record to give these predictions any more weight than anyone else's. They're just for fun.


HOUSE (231 R - 202 D)

15 seats gives us Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a fierce battle between John Murtha and Steny Hoyer for House Majority Leader.



24 seat pickup if there's no wave, which I think is the likelier outcome.

36 seat pickup if there is a wave.



Shocker upset: There are several candidates to choose from -- ID-01, WA-05, NE-03, and CO-05 all qualify, and are all surprisingly winnable races in solidly Republican districts. But my shocker upset pick is Gary Trauner in the Wyoming at-large seat.


SENATE (55 R - 45 D)

I'm trying not to be too optimistic, but I'm seeing a 6-seat gain in the Senate. Pickups in bold.


Minnesota: 15-point Klobuchar (D) win
Michigan: 13-point Stabenow (D) win
Washington: 12-point Cantwell (D) win
New Jersey: 10-point Menendez (D) win
Pennsylvania: 10-point Casey (D) win
Ohio: 8-point Brown (D) win
Maryland: 7-point Cardin (D) win
Rhode Island: 6 -point Whitehouse (D) win
Montana: 4-point Tester (D) win
Virginia: 4-point Webb (D) win
Missouri: 1-point McCaskill (D) win

Arizona: 5-point Kyl (R) win
Tennessee: 8-point Corker (R) win
Nevada: 10-point Ensign (R) win


Of these, I'm least comfortable with the Missouri call. While polling shows the race tied (or the tiniest McCaskill lead), the GOP ground game has been traditionally better in Missouri. Have the Democrats made progress? I haven't gotten a good read on that (as opposed to states like Virginia, Montana and Nebraska), so I can't tell. This one will be decided by the better ground game.

Shocker upset: Republican Steele in Maryland was a strong candidate for my shocker upset pick, but I'm having a hard time seeing Indigo Blue Maryland send a Republican to the Senate. So I'll go with Arizona. Kyl is likely to win, but there's been late movement in Pederson's (D) direction.

And what about Connecticut? I'll probably live to regret it, but I've bought the hype of Lamont's ground operation and excitement. And I'm convinced that pollsters have no idea how to poll a three-way race with the dynamics we're seeing in Connecticut. So I'm going to go with Lamont by the thinnest of margins over Lieberman -- 43.1-42.9, with Schlesinger picking up 14 percent of the vote.


GOVERNOR (28 R - 22 D)

I'm seeing a 8-seat gain in governorships. Pickups in bold.


New York: 30-point Spitzer (D) win
Massachusetts: 24-point Patrick (D) win
Ohio: 20-point Strickland (D) win
Colorado: 14-point Ritter (D) win
Arkansas: 10-point Beebe (D) win
Illinois: 10-point Blagojevich (D) win
Michigan: 10-point Granholm (D) win
Wisconsin: 8-point Doyle (D) win
Oregon: 7-point Kulongoski (D) win
Maryland: 6-point O'Malley (D) win
Maine: 6-point Baldacci (D) win
Minnesota: 4-point Hatch (D) win
Iowa: 3-point Culver (D) win
Alaska: 2-point Knowles win

Nevada: 3-point Gibbons (R) win
Idaho: 4-point Otter (R) win
Rhode Island: 7-point Carcieri (R) win
Florida: 8-point Crist (R) win
California: 12-point Schwarzenegger (R) win


I'm probably being a bit optimistic in Alaska, but Knowles has erased a huge deficit in the last month and has a tested and effective ground operation (especially in the most remote parts of his vast state).

Shocker upset: Nevada is a strong candidate, with Gibbons suddenly weighed down by scandal. But I'll go with Idaho, where Democrat Jerry Brady has run neck and neck in the polls with his Republican opponent Rep. Butch Otter.

----

One last point -- there's never been an election in which one party failed to pick up a seat from the opposition in the House. Even in the 1994 blowout, Democrats picked up three Republican seats.

Yet this year there's a strong possibility that this may happen not just in the House, and not just the Senate as well, but in governorships as well.

The Republicans have only three legitimate pickup opportunities in the House -- IL-08, and in the just-redistricted GA-08, and GA-12. In the governorships, their best chances are in Maine, Oregon, and Wisconsin. And in the Senate, their best chances is pretty much just Maryland.

I think they'll get shut out completely, but if they may any gains, it'll be one of those two Georgia seats.


234
3DHS / GW Bush/ LH Oswald: Peas in a pod
« on: November 03, 2006, 08:52:25 PM »
W's being led out in front of the cameras and Perle is playing Ruby.

From DailyKos.com

Perle checks out; blames others
by kos
Fri Nov 03, 2006 at 05:00:40 PM CST
Even the chief neocons are jumping ship.



A group of neoconservatives led by former chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee Richard Perle and former Pentagon insider Kenneth Adelman tell Vanity Fair that they blame the "dysfunctional" Bush administration for the "disaster" in Iraq and say that if they had it to do over again they would not advocate an invasion of Iraq.



Of course, they're not faulting their fantastical reality-addled theories or their lack of historical grasp, but Bush and his ability to deal with the "disloyal" saboteurs in the administration.



Perle tells Vanity Fair that, "at the end of the day, you have to hold the president responsible.... I don't think he realized the extent of the opposition within his own administration, and the disloyalty.... [Bush] did not make decisions, in part because the machinery of government that he nominally ran was actually running him."

Adelman tells Vanity Fair that when he wrote in 2002 that "liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk," he "just presumed that what I considered to be the most competent national-security team since Truman was indeed going to be competent. They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the postwar era. Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional."

Adelman also tells Vanity Fair that "the idea of using our power for moral good in the world" is dead, at least for a generation. After Iraq, he says, "it's not going to sell."

Of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, whom Adelman says he is "very, very fond of," he admits, "I'm crushed by his performance. Did he change, or were we wrong in the past? Or is it that he was never really challenged before? I don't know. He certainly fooled me."

Adelman adds that he "checked out" of this administration the day that Bush gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to former C.I.A. director George Tenet, General Tommy Franks, and Coalition Provisional Authority administrator Paul Bremer--"three of the most incompetent people who've ever served in such key spots."



You've got to hand it to these jokers -- eager to point fingers anywhere but at themselves.

If a building collapses from poor engineering, do you blame the engineers and architects who designed it, or the grunts who implemented the plan?

The problem here wasn't that the implementation was poor, but that the plan was never going to work. But of course the "serious" people in DC furrowed their brows in gravitas-building seriousness and shepherded the media and the country toward this epic disaster.

Bush's failure was 1) in greenlighting the plan, as if he had the capacity to evaluate it on its merits, and 2) in creating an environment where those who urged caution were quickly kicked off the team.

But there isn't a team alive that could've given us a different outcome in Iraq. That's why people like me opposed it from the start. Not because of any affinity for Saddam, but because we loved our country too much to let it get sucked into this kind of endless disaster.

235
3DHS / Exemplifying The Conflict Within The GOP
« on: November 02, 2006, 03:39:13 PM »
Lemme tellya.  I'm really not a fan of this guy.  He's a bigshot conservative blogger here in Shelby County and I've always had nothing but disdain for him but he kind of won my respect when I read this post of his today.

I know none of the conservatives here will admit to his logic but I'd urge you to try.

Here's a sliver.

Quote
It really challenges me to examine my thinking, and forces me to decide if I want government to be in the marriage business at all. As a Christian (one who, unlike Thomas, has at least a passing familiarity with the Bible), I cannot support gay marriage; as a citizen, I cannot support discrimination.


http://www.fishkite.com/2006/10/26/1539/#comments

236
3DHS / BT
« on: November 01, 2006, 10:21:28 AM »
I need your help but I get my email and I can't use yahoo here at work and I need to give you sensitive info.  Is there any way to do a private in 3DHS?


237
3DHS / DailyKos Has Officially Jumped The Shark
« on: October 31, 2006, 11:05:52 AM »
Over at Kos they are crowing and billing about Marilyn Musgrave of CO-04 and her "thugs in action".  You really have to get an eyefull of this crap.  http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/31/01014/779

Plus they have VIDEO!

The quote from the post after the video.  "Pretty amazing, how these thugs think they literally own the streets."

And yet, just two days yore, here is another video that got NO PLAY on Kos that I saw.

http://thefreedonian.blogspot.com/2006/10/another-day-another-meltdown.html

That's Harold Ford Jr apparently blowing his nose.

This is utter hypocrisy on the part of Kossacks.


238
3DHS / Zogby: Lamont within striking distance. Sorry BT
« on: October 31, 2006, 10:06:37 AM »
A new Zogby poll released today shows that Lamont has closed the gap and he is within striking distance.  The poll was taken between 10/23-10/27 and shows:

Lieberman 47
Lamont 43
Schlesinger 6

So, the race is far from over.  Lamont is within 4 points and he can win.  In fact when Lieberman won in 1988, Weicker was leading in the polls by 6 points the day before the election. 

From DailyKos

240
3DHS / I Wish That 3DHS Had A Historian
« on: October 30, 2006, 12:34:41 PM »
I would love if there were someone who kept up with what people say and had a list of everyone's stances so we could take the wayback machine on some new stuff.

It'd be so much fun to see who had flipped and bring it up even if it was me.


Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18