Author Topic: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry  (Read 4608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2012, 07:43:30 PM »
If they refuse to approve Kerry because of whether or not Hillary testifies, this is unrelated to the welfare of the country and is  just the Republican'ts being childish chickenshits.

I seriously doubt that the GOP Senators would vote against confirming Kerry. However the timing of the final approval is completely up to them and the due diligence they exercise certainly is in the best interest of the country. Your labeling it as chickenshit petty politics has no bearing on the fact that the GOP Senators are exercising their constitutional mandate to Advise and Consent.

Deal with it!

BSB

  • Guest
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2012, 11:21:05 PM »
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Is Hospitalized With Blood Clot 

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was hospitalized on Sunday with a blood clot stemming from a concussion she suffered earlier this month, a State Department spokesman said.
Mrs. Clinton, who canceled most of her public events in recent weeks because of her concussion, was at a follow-up exam Sunday when doctors discovered a blood clot, according to Philippe Reines, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton.

“She is being treated with anticoagulants and is at New York-Presbyterian Hospital so that they can monitor the medication over the next 48 hours,” Mr. Reines said in a statement.

READ MORE »
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/31/us/hillary-clinton-goes-to-hospital-after-exam-finds-a-blood-clot.html?emc=na 

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #17 on: December 31, 2012, 12:11:16 AM »
Hope it doesn't get to her lungs or brain.  That would be very bad     :(
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2012, 12:20:26 AM »
Hope it doesn't get to her lungs or brain.  That would be very bad     :(

SIRS....I think they are reporting the clot is in her leg.
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #19 on: December 31, 2012, 01:10:05 AM »
Blood clots can be deadly serious, or not serious at all.

Maybe we will be told how serious this one is , but there is no requirement .

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #20 on: December 31, 2012, 01:28:41 AM »
I think she is in a 28 day rehab program.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #21 on: December 31, 2012, 02:15:49 AM »
Hope it doesn't get to her lungs or brain.  That would be very bad     :(

SIRS....I think they are reporting the clot is in her leg.

I would think so, as that's usually where they catch them.  The hope is that it doesn't break off and get itself lodged into the lungs or brain, as that would be very bad
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #22 on: December 31, 2012, 09:42:51 AM »
The hope is that it doesn't break off and get itself lodged into the lungs or brain, as that would be very bad

"very bad"?.......what happens?
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #23 on: December 31, 2012, 10:44:38 AM »
Deal with it!
------------------------------
It is my opinion. I hardly expect it to cause Mitch McConnell or Rand Paul  or either of Alabama's yokel senators to behave like competent human beings

Chickenshit petty politics is still chickenshit petty politics.

It is one's right to hump parking meters too, but that does not make it proper behavior.

The Republican'ts could all assempble wearing pinl gauze tutus and feather boas as well, but that does npot make it proper.

Nothing Hillary did or failed to do has one damned thing to do with Kerry's qualifications.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #24 on: December 31, 2012, 11:04:03 AM »
what Hillary did has a bearing on the questions Kerry is asked.
Let's see if he passes his audition.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #25 on: December 31, 2012, 11:33:11 AM »
The hope is that it doesn't break off and get itself lodged into the lungs or brain, as that would be very bad

"very bad"?.......what happens?

If the clot moves out of the leg, into the brain, it can cause a stroke, and possibly death depending on where in the brain it lodges.  A clot that lodges into the lungs, can cause a potentially fatal Pulmonary Embolus (think of a stroke, but its to the lungs, not the brain, that becomes severely damaged)  And if you can't breath, you can't live
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #26 on: December 31, 2012, 12:00:55 PM »
Nixon had something like this. If they know where the clot is, they can bring it under control. Even if they don't, there are some drugs that can dissolve it.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #27 on: December 31, 2012, 04:07:42 PM »
Indeed....which is what she's undergoing now.  They know where the clot is, otherwise it couldn't have been diagnosed as a clot.  Now its simply a matter of dissolving it before it can potentially become deadly
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #28 on: December 31, 2012, 10:58:27 PM »
Hillary Clinton in hospital amid
speculation of plane accident in Iran


DEBKAfile Special Report

December 31, 2012, 11:08 PM


Hillary Clinton in a recent appearance in Turkey

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's admittance to the New York-Presbyterian Hospital Monday, Dec, 31 - with a blood clot caused by concussion - gave wings to a cloud of rumor and conspiracy theories surrounding her state of health. The hospital, where Saudi King Abdullah was also treated two years ago, stated that the Secretary was receiving anti-coagulents and her condition would be assessed after 48 hours.

However, NBC television's medical correspondent Robert Bazell was skeptical about the blood clot being caused by an earlier concussion because, he said, it if were, it would not be treated with anti-coagulents. "So either it's not really related to the concussion and she's got a blood clot in her leg or something, or there's something else going on that we're not being told."

Speculation about her condition started flying about in early December, when she cancelled without notice, her participation in the Friends of Syrian forum in Marrakesh on Dec, 6. Not only was she one of the founders of this forum, but her presence was vitally needed at the time because NATO and Washington were picking up suspicious movements of the Syrian army's chemical weapons, which marked a disastrous turn in the Syrian conflict.

She was first reported to have come down with flu and, three days later, on Dec, 9, with a stomach bug.
On Dec. 10, the day before she was due to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee on the September 11 terrorist attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi - in which Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other US diplomats lost there lives -   the State Department which has been heavily under fire over the episode, announced that Clinton had sustained a concussion after fainting out from dehydration.

None of the details normally released in such cases, such as when exactly she fainted, the seriousness of the concussion she suffered or how she was being treated, was offered. A State Department source was only willing to say it was "not severe."

According to another unofficial report, she was apparently working from home. No one in the office appeared to have been delegated her functions although the secretary herself has not been been absent for three weeks.

Then, Friday, Dec. 21, President Barack Obama announced the nomination of Massachusetts Senator John Kerry as next Secretary of State. Clinton had made it known for some time that she intended stepping down at the start of Obama's second term of office. It was reported that she had talked to the president and Kerry, and commended the senator as having proven his mettle in a long and wide-ranging military, political and diplomatic career. Nothing was said on this occasion about her state of health.

But around Tehran and the Gulf Emirates, debkafile was already picking up insistent rumors claiming that Clinton was seriously injured while on a secret mission in the region in the first week of December. Some claimed that in the same incident, Americans in her party - advisers and security personnel - were either injured or killed. Those rumors did not say what her secret mission was.  However, the episode described occurred shortly after Dec. 1, when, as debkafile reported at the time, Obama administration officials and senior representatives of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei launched secret talks on Iran's nuclear program.

Although our sources have not identified the negotiators on either side of the table, one of the theories floating around certain capitals claimed that Hillary Clinton three weeks ago was on her way to a secret meeting with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in regard to those negotiations. The plane carrying her from Bahrain logged its destination as Baghdad, but  is described as having changed direction in midair and headed for Ahvaz, capital of the south Iranian province of Khuzestan. There, it was said, the Iranian president was awaiting her arrival. But then the plane ran into technical trouble and made an emergency landing and that was when she was injured, according to this theory.

The unexplained death of Commander Job Price, 42, SEALs commander in Afghanistan is tied by some of the speculation to that incident. At the time, the Pentagon reported that his sudden death on Dec. 22, in Uruzgan, Afghanistan, was under investigation. It is now suggested that Commander Price was head of the security detail attached to Clinton for her Iran mission and he was one of the casualties of the accident.

In the nature of things, the impact these kinds of rumors have lingers even when they are officially denied especially given Secretary Clinton's unusually long absence from the public eye. The medical report promised Wednesday after she is monitored at the hospital for 48 hours to assess her condition, "including other issues associated with her concussion," is tensely awaited.  After that, said the hospital announcement, "her doctors will determine if any further action is required."

Clinton, known as the most traveled Secretary of State in US diplomatic history, has been in the international spotlight since 1992 when her husband Bill Clinton was elected president and she became first lady. She then served in the US Senate and later ran for the presidency against Barack Obama.

http://www.debka.com/article/22645/Hillary-Clinton-in-hospital-amid-speculation-of-plane-accident-in-Iran
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: No Clinton?.....then no Kerry
« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2013, 02:17:55 PM »
Word on Drudge.......looks like dear Hillary will now testify.  You know, if the left and the Obama sychophants could have been up front and agree that it's completely appropriate for the head of the State Dept to testify on an action that has been concluded in many reports so far, that was the fault of the state dept, for what happened in Benghazi, but that she needed time to heal/recover from a plausible dangerous medical condition, most of us would have been ok with it.  take as much time as she needs to heal

The issue comes when those same sychophants try to claim some nonsense that she didn't need to testify, that it was some "non-issue", that's its just the right trying to muddy up Obama & Co....and you know, the latter may be true.  We all know that if it had been a Republican's SoS, the MSM wolves and left, would have been demanding blood, but we also all know of the ongoing double standard that the MSM applies to Republicans vs Democrats.

Point being, it now appears, barring some outbreak of war or medical deterioration on her part, that she will testify
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle