From this argument, one may infer that the initial decision to invade Iraq was not negligent or reckless, or one may infer the contrary. Certainly in retrospect, however, the invasion was a monumental mistake.
impatience rules....different culture, an instant one.
Sirs, a friend of mine uses this phrase which I see as so true these days: "Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for western civilization as it commits suicide."
The left works from hope. The right works from fear
Guns?
Sure, why not?
I'm really libertarian when it comes to stuff like guns and drugs. Let the states handle it. If NY wants to ban assault rifles then fine. Let em.
Let people smoke all the pot and take all the heroine they want.
Of course, this is the same old strawman bullshit.
Nobody said anything about handing out guns at insane asylums.
How long did it take to establish government in post WWII contries?
What is diffrent now?
and/or it embedded in a chip on your wrist
If you like, you can count it.
The DDR was set up in 1949 and was done relatively peacefully.
I was assuming that you and Sirs were comparing the governments of Western Europe that came under United States' influence. I had no idea we were planning on setting up a Soviet Sattellite state in Iraq ;)
The article is just the same old bullshit from morons.
.. but the cartoon got me thinking
The left believes in solving problems and creating peace. The right believes in erasing dissent and "winning".
Guns?
Sure, why not?
I'm really libertarian when it comes to stuff like guns and drugs. Let the states handle it. If NY wants to ban assault rifles then fine. Let em.
Let people smoke all the pot and take all the heroine they want.
That would be the act of transference, I do believe. Especially considering how often the right is trying to solve problems (SS, Foreign Oil dependency, Medicare, the deficit, war on Terrorism, etc), and it's the left that keeps crying foul, stop, don't do that
Il is the ruler of a country of millions. They should be allowed to follow their own path. If they fear their neighbors then they should be allowed to defend themselves. We do it. We've attacked another country just for kicks. Why can't they? What moral authority grants us the right to kill over half a million people just because we can?
Answer me this. What gives you the right to decide something for a whole 'nother country?
Yep, sold well over a million copies. Want one? I'll buy it and ship it to you...Or, I've got one or two at home.
After WWII overthrown governments were started over or started from scratch all over Europe and Asia.
But each one had less outside interference than Iraq does.
Japan and South Korea have turned out pretty well , too bad about France.
If Iraq can't do better than France shall I call it all a failure?
Plane,
Ill is the ruler of a country of millions. They should be allowed to follow their own path. If they fear their neighbors then they should be allowed to defend themselves.
We do it. We've attacked another country just for kicks. Why can't they? What moral authority grants us the right to kill over half a million people just because we can?
Because we have more bombs?
In order to solve the problem of the deficit, it helps if you don't CREATE ONE out of the highest surplus in history."