DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: sirs on April 13, 2013, 02:04:01 PM
-
Liberalism is teeming with arrogant, close-minded, extraordinarily offensive people who seem completely oblivious to how habitually obnoxious and intolerant their behavior has become (http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/04/13/5-types-of-liberals-who-need-sensitivity-training-n1566587/page/full/)
1) Man-Hating Feminists: Left-wing feminists who hate men are as unattractive as human beings as backward Neanderthals who think women are only good for sex, ironing and bringing them beer. Let me add that their loving embrace of abortion is downright creepy. Being furious at people who correctly suggest there are consequences to abortion or kicking over pro-life signs because you're afraid of an "overpopulated earth" sounds nuts. Here's a news flash for these bitter, angry women: Men aren't your enemies; most men don't gain any particular leg-up in life because of their sex and if you do ever have a male child, he shouldn't have to grow up in a world where his own mother is teaching people that he's part of the problem based on his gender.
2) Overbearing Gay Marriage Advocates: Nobody bullies and hates quite like someone who's convinced that he’s being "victimized." You see, if you feel like you're "fighting back," that makes it allowable for you to gin up hatred and misogyny against people who disagree with you, as Dan Savage does, or tell people who disagree with you that they should kill themselves and reject their Christian parents like Michelangelo Signorile. It's ironic that supporters of God's definition of marriage are attacked as hateful by supporters of gay marriage because some of the most vicious, hateful and nasty rhetoric in all of politics is coming from overbearing advocates of gay marriage.
3) Militant Atheists: We're in nation that's 70% Christian, but bizarrely, it's the angry atheists who are intolerant of the Christians, not vice-versa. From their blasphemous artwork, to their unending hostility to all things Christian, to the childish little fits they pitch when they see people practicing their faith, militant atheists are some of the least tolerant people in America. When we've even gotten to the point where angry atheists are outraged by children being taken to see "A Charlie Brown Christmas," then I think it's time for them to admit they need some help learning how to play nice with other human beings.
4) Race Hustlers: People like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry and Toure seem to be completely unaware of how offensive it is to be falsely called a racist. It's not quite the same thing as someone making a joke about a black man eating watermelon, but it's roughly equivalent in offensiveness. Yet, the charge is tossed around on a regular basis for the flimsiest of reasons. Happily, racial slurs have been relegated to the fringes in American society and false accusations of racism deserve to be in that same category.
5) Sexist Liberal Men: One of the great ironies of the "War on Women" theme that dominated the last election cycle is that the most grotesque sexism in politics comes from the Left these days. The liberals put out Sarah Palin porn flicks, they made gross jokes about Michele Bachmann eating a corndog, they speculate about which conservative women they want to hate f*ck -- it just goes on and on. It's gross, crude, stupid and all too typical. All the abuse someone like Sandra Fluke has taken in her entire lifetime is probably nothing more than an average Tuesday to someone like Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin. Why? Because liberal men believe they can't be sexist, by virtue of the fact that they're liberal men. That sort of gross sexism seems to be the rule, not the exception, with liberal men and their hypocritical feminist enablers who turn a blind eye to their horrible behavior.
-
Take a flying eff at a rolling doughnut, sirs. No one likes you because you are a prick.
No one is going to change their behavior when talking to a prick.
-
Another example of a hard core liberal in severe need of some sensitivity training
-
You are a boring creep who has already demonstrated what a tedious prick you really are.
-
Perhaps we can get a self study course up and running for our hard core liberal saloon patron
-
Maybe you can learn how to stuff a pineapple up your bunghole, prickly end first.
-
Y A W N
-
Pine cones could also be used, also blowfish and porcupines.
-
Y A W N (squared)
-
I like SIRS...
consider him a friend...that I hope to meet someday
and XO by being so mean-spirited you kind of proved SIRS point of the thread
man...what were you thinking?
-
Funny how that works out ;) You see and hear ALL this need for "civility.....diversity.....tolerance of differing positions/opinions........unless of course you don't subscribe to those predetermined positions/opinions, then watch the hypocrisy unfold, as they demonstrate precisely the polar opposite of what they rhetorically push.
You rarely (never hear in the saloon) see someone from the right advocate that some leftist shouldn't be heard, that their opinion didn't mean anything, followed by a litany of immature name calling. And yet, its the side that preaches "diversity" & "tolerance" who can't seem to demonstrate any tolerance to thought that runs counter to theirs
-
You ignorant ass.
You start a topic saying "let's talk about all the faults of people like YOU, and I am supposed to be tolerant?
You are just a boring, unimaginative prick. There is no reason to discuss crap like this with you.
shove it, sirs, you have no sense at all.
-
See what I mean? Thanks again, xo
-
You are hopelessly ignorant and devoid of any sort of people skills.
What sort of person is going to respond to a stupid bunch of crap like what you posted: "why all people like you suck".
You are merely a jerk trying to bully me in a venue in which no one can be bullied.
The most significant fact about stupid, boring people is that they are unaware that they are stupid and boring. This is due to their stupidity and the ability to see anything from any point of view but their own.
-
This is due to their stupidity and the ability to see anything from any point of view but their own.
Do you mean "inability"?
-
Why yes, that is what I mean. inability.
thanks.
-
Xo, seriously, you have to try laying off the ignorant accusations, since everyone is ignorant in something. I'm ignorant in speaking spanish. You're ignorant in nearly everything political, especially as it relates to conservatives & the Bill of Rights. You're a beacon of ignorance when it comes to the Tea Party & firearms, in particular their defensive useage in this country
And no, it wasn't at all this thread that "provoked" you in your latest rash of 3rd grad insults. You provide those on a daily basis to anything posted that's pro-conservative issue/person. You are a litany of intolerance to anything conservative, coming from the side that supposedly preaches tolerance. So you can erroneusly keep trying to blame me for YOUR choices and actions, but as referenced before, you'd only be fooling yourself.
I can only pray that these words of critique get thru those idiologically rigid blinders of yours, since you COULD provide far more objective insight from the left,....if you were to focus and take the necessary time and energy to support your positions, rather than the easy, lazy mode of simply proclaiming them "obvious", followed by the name calling for anyone that dares to disagree
-
There is no point in discussing anything with you. You are a total zero to the left.
There is no point in trying to educate you about anything.
I might as well try to teach a cockroach to read.
-
And yet again, reinforcing my point, as if this was about me, when you could be "educating" everyone/anyone else. I can't count how many times Plane & Bt have asked you direct questions that you steered clear from. But since apparently you are unable, you want to try to use me as your go to person to deflect from your INABILITY to see anything from any point of view but your own. Funny how that works, isn't it
-
You make no sense at all.
You say that I could be educating everyone, but somehow I can't because my point of view is wrong, wrong, wrong.
You are NOT my "go to" person. Perhaps you know more about carpal tunnel or something than I do, but I have seen no evidence that you qualify as anyone's "go to person".
The Tea Party excels in the three things that Buddha called "the three poisons" Ignorance, Greed and Anger. There is my thought for the day.
-
You make no sense at all.
It's called ideological blinders. That's why it makes no sense to you.
You say that I could be educating everyone, but somehow I can't because my point of view is wrong, wrong, wrong.
There's an easy fix....demonstrate how its right with some facts and/or evidence, instead of the knee jerk response of insults and that your POV is simply "obvious". And try not using me as your scapegoat when you can't. It's pretty transparent
The Tea Party excels in the three things that Buddha called "the three poisons" Ignorance, Greed and Anger
Ok, here's a good opportunity......demonstrate HOW, with some facts and/or examples. Not just your "obvious" say so. And no, not to me, but for anyone that would want to know, if they indeed supposedly excel in.
-
You start a topic saying "let's talk about all the faults of people like YOU, and I am supposed to be tolerant?
That would meet the definition of tolerance, nobody gets to tolerate what they do like.
How do you feel when you post an opinion of your own, or one you agree with, that demonisesor minimises a class or party?
-
The Tea Party excels in the three things that Buddha called "the three poisons" Ignorance, Greed and Anger
Ok, here's a good opportunity......demonstrate HOW, with some facts and/or examples. Not just your "obvious" say so. And no, not to me, but for anyone that would want to know, if they indeed supposedly excel in.
Now see?.........Xo has made multiple posts since this last one, using the opportunity respond to one of them as stupid. Here we had a perfect opportunity to help demonstrate for everyone, not just me, how his "point of view is right, right, right", or even to respond to Plane's inquiry as it relates to what is tolerance.
Does he take this golden opportunity to inject some substantive dialog both enhancing debate, in this, a debate forum, and attempting to reinforce his currently questionable point of view?
It's all about choices and none of it has to do with me or what I personaly would or wouldn't believe. It's all about how one uses this, a debate forum