Author Topic: Hope & Change....  (Read 1362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Hope & Change....
« on: September 27, 2010, 02:05:02 PM »
...has never been so non-present, as it currently is.  Be-it the sense of depression most of the Private sector sees themselves in, or SOP in DC.  Take for instance the latest cowardly act by the Democrats.  (and ironically one of the reasons they're likely to suffer some humiliating defeats this Nov).  All this huff & puff about needing to maintain tax cuts to the "middle class", but can't dare have any tax cuts being extended to "the rich" has the Dems
a) passing legislation extending tax cuts to the middle class
or
b) punting it, with the continued use of the classwarfare PC rhetoric

If you picked b), you are correct.  They ran for the hills, and decided not to decide anything until after Nov.  And you wonder why folks like Michael Moore and Keith Olberman are so disillusioned, if not bitterly angry with Obama & the Dem Party
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2010, 03:55:59 PM »
People that put stock in HOPE are truly HOPELESS losers. The idea of electing the POTUS based on HOPE is absurd. People that voted for Obama deserve no respect, they are suckers and losers to the highest degree.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2010, 04:02:23 PM »
The blank slate, referred to as "The Chosen", has bever been so blank
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2010, 04:16:50 PM »
The blank slate, referred to as "The Chosen", has bever been so blank

Oh yes he was blank before he arrived in Chicago. In Chicago he remained a blank zero nothing of a person (just a race-baiter), until a bunch of sick, wealthy, people, like Soros, saw the potential in this useful idiot and his ability to read a prompter, yet be led around by the snout. A weakling, easily manipulated by his childlike unyielding ideologue belief system, small-minded, pussy like persona. They saw a clean cut negro that could switch between Ebonics and English to bring in uneducated minority voters and loser white guilt liberals. Himself nothing but a egomaniac loser that possesses the gift of bullshit all wrapped up in a shallow immature boyish over-rated under-achieving (deep down inside a self deprecating) twit of a human being.


Only someone with low-self-esteem would bow down to a tyrant like Hugo Chavez.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2010, 04:24:13 PM by Kramer »

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2010, 01:17:59 AM »
Congress prepares to punt, spend the fall campaigning

WASHINGTON ? Congress is deadlocked over virtually every major issue still pending this year, including key economic matters such as a detailed federal spending plan and extending Bush-era tax cuts, yet lawmakers still hope to leave Washington by Friday and not return until mid-November.

Chances are they'll approve a stopgap budget to keep the government running, maybe vote on extending the Bush administration tax cuts and call it a day. This desire to punt on the day's biggest issue could be one more reason for voters to turn against incumbents of both parties in November.

"The public is not concerned about the specifics of the process breakdown. They just know things aren't working, either in Congress or the economy, and they want things fixed," said Lee Miringoff, the director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion.

Analysts think Republicans have a decent chance to gain the 39 seats the party needs to take control of the House of Representatives, and an outside chance of a net gain of the 10 Senate seats needed to control that chamber. Members of Congress, who returned to Washington on Sept. 13 after taking off most of August and early September, clearly want to return home to fight for their political lives. Last week, Congress produced one major piece of legislation as the House voted, largely along party lines, to send President Barack Obama a small business relief bill. The Senate, however, failed to end debate _ and thus delayed indefinitely _ efforts to revamp some immigration laws and consider the "don't ask, don't tell" policy toward gays in the military. It also postponed consideration of defense policy legislation until after the election.

What the public sees, polls and experts say, is a Congress that's unable to get vital work done at a time when most surveys find that about 60 percent of Americans think the country is on the wrong track.

The McClatchy-Marist poll, taken Sept. 14 to 16, found that 52 percent of Americans think the worst is yet to come economically, while 44 percent said the worst is behind us. More than half _ 56 percent _ said they disapprove of how Obama is handling the economy. The survey of 1,005 people had a margin of error of plus-or-minus 3 percentage points.

Other surveys this month put Congress' disapproval ratings at 70 percent or higher. People don't understand why the institution is so awash in finger-pointing rhetoric, particularly on economic matters.

"Everybody else has to have some kind of household budget. Everybody understands that," said Merle Black, a professor of politics and government at Emory University in Atlanta.

Nevertheless, there's little sense of urgency on Capitol Hill. This week, no Senate votes are scheduled until Tuesday, and the House isn't slated to begin voting again until Wednesday. Sometime before Friday, lawmakers are expected to approve the stopgap measure to keep the government running, and then probably leave until mid-November.

Congress is supposed to pass a budget in several stages each year. In the spring, it usually comes up with a general outline of how much the government can spend. Then appropriations panels write separate bills, each covering a distinct area such as defense, transportation or education, that spell out the upcoming year's spending. Legislation can also deal with tax cuts or increases.

While the goal of finishing all the spending bills by Oct. 1, the start of the federal government's fiscal year, rarely has been met since the budget-writing laws were changed in the 1970s, lawmakers usually made some progress.

Not this year, and the fate of an extension of Bush-era tax cuts, most of which expire at the end of 2010, also remains uncertain. Senate Democrats met Thursday privately, and afterward they all but abandoned making a pre-election effort because they appear unlikely to get the 60 votes needed to cut off debate.

Democratic leaders want to extend only the Bush rates that apply to individuals who earn less than $200,000 a year and joint filers making less than $250,000. They want the top rates, now 33 percent and 35 percent, to revert to 36 percent and 39.6 percent.

Many moderate Democrats, however, are balking at reinstating the higher rates, at least for a while. Thirty-one House moderates signed a Sept. 15 letter urging all the cuts be extended, and in the Senate, Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, warned that raising any rates is "the surest way for Congress to help bring about a double-dip recession."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is weighing the possibility of a middle class tax cut vote before the election, a vote some think would have political benefits for Democrats. Republicans would have to go along with the Democrats' plan, or risk being labeled opponents of a middle-class tax cut. However, such a vote also could hurt moderate Democrats who don't want to be accused of favoring higher income taxes.

The election, however, may turn on a more important question: Is the public tired of all the political games? Does it think Congress is doing its job?

After all, people don't follow the legislative process, said moderate Rep. Allen Boyd, D-Fla. "People care about jobs and the economy," he said. "They're not following on a daily basis what we do."

They care about perceptions and results. "They don't get the budget process at all," said Larry Sabato, the director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "But what they may understand is that these guys have an enormous majority, and they can't even get a budget passed."



And the punt is shanked
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2010, 06:58:13 PM »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2010, 04:07:03 AM »
Profiles in Timidity

Last week, Senate Democrats did not even bother to schedule a debate, let alone a vote, on the expiring Bush tax cuts. This week, House Democrats appear poised to follow suit. The idea is to spare incumbents from having to vote before Nov. 2 on whether to let the rich go on paying less taxes than the nation needs them to pay.

This particular failure to act was not about Republican obstructionism, of which there has been plenty. This was about Democrats failing to seize an opportunity to do the right thing and at the same time draw a sharp distinction between themselves and the Republicans.

President Obama has been steadfast, and basically correct, in calling to extend the Bush tax cuts for 98 percent of taxpayers and to let them expire for the top 2 percent. But by postponing a vote on the cuts, Democrats are increasing the likelihood of an eventual cave-in to Republicans, who are pushing for an extension of all the tax cuts, including the high-end ones.

We presume that Democrats, especially those in more conservative districts, are doing this in response to the anti-Washington insurgency on the right. But it's hard to imagine that conservative voters will confuse them for Republicans, and punting on the tax cuts won't score them any points with the Democratic base.

As the politics of the tax-cut fight move to center stage, far more important issues are being pushed into the background. Letting the high-end tax cuts expire, for instance, is a crucial step in the long process of reducing the federal budget deficit. Extending them will add $700 billion more to the debt over the next decade than under the Obama administration's tax proposal, and for what? To bolster the weak economy, the money would be better spent in any of several more demonstrably effective ways, like payroll tax cuts, infrastructure spending or state aid to hire more teachers and police.

Letting the high-end cuts expire would also be a strong signal to the nation's creditors that Congress has the political will to cut deficits and, by extension, to prudently service debts. Delaying a vote on the tax cuts leaves that message hopelessly muddled.

To their credit, 46 House Democrats sent a letter recently urging Speaker Nancy Pelosi to hold a vote on the tax cuts before the election. But 31 other Democrats, many of them self-described deficit hawks, also sent a letter urging that the high-end tax cuts be extended.

The American public is right to be confused and distrustful of its elected representatives.

Their focus on the well-being of the richest Americans is eclipsing the needs and concerns of vulnerable Americans. A roughly $1 billion pro-work program in last year's stimulus law that has provided jobs to 250,000 low-income workers is scheduled to expire at the end of September. But with less than a week to go before adjourning, Democrats have been unable to get Republican support to extend the program or, it seems, to make the Republicans pay a political price for being the Party of No.

This program is a model of the welfare-to-work initiatives long championed by the Republican Party. But Republican lawmakers would prefer to end it than to let the Obama stimulus package be seen as helpful. So deep is their desire to thwart Mr. Obama and the Democrats, that they are ignoring Republican governors who have called for the program?s continuation. And they have indicated they would vote down a must-pass spending bill and other last-minute legislation if Democrats attach a provision to extend the program to those bills.

That is pure obstructionism, but it leaves Democrats still struggling to challenge the Republicans' ability to define the terms of the political debate this election season, while Americans who really need the help go without.


OUCH.......y tu', NYTimes?
« Last Edit: September 30, 2010, 11:47:15 AM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2010, 09:39:41 PM »
How's "Hope" and "Change" Working For You, Mr. President?

Did you see President Obama?s recent speech at the University Of Wisconsin?

It made me want to ask him ?how?s this ?hope? and ?change? thing workin? out for you, Mr. President? And how, exactly do you define ?progress?, anyway??

Delivering a speech in the university?s outdoor ?library mall? last Tuesday in what was billed as a rally for the ?under 30 crowd,? President Obama drew an estimated 10,000 people. It was a sizeable audience, for sure, but smaller than the estimated 17,000 that gathered at the same venue to see candidate Obama two years ago.

As for the mood of the audience, Jake Tapper of ABC News observed that enthusiasm was a bit ?dampened? this time around, noting politely that ?the crowd is happy to be here, but they do seem to be able to contain their excitement??

Yet at one crucial point in his speech, President Obama delivered an impassioned diatribe about the struggle for human ?progress,? and used that as a backdrop to deliver a special ?please don?t abandon me? request. You owe it to yourself to watch the video, but a direct transcript of these remarks reads like this:

??In every instance, progress took time? in every instance, progress took sacrifice? progress took faith?ya know?the slaves sittin? around the fire?.singin? freedom songs?they weren?t sure when slavery would end but they understood it was gonna?.when women were out there marchin? for the right to vote?they weren?t sure when it was gonna happen but they kept on goin??.when workers were organizing for the right to organize, and were bein? intimidated, they weren?t sure when change was gonna come, but they knew it was gonna come, and I am tellin? you Wisconsin? we are bringin? about change, and progress is gonna come?but you gotta stick with me, ya can?t lose heart??

That big chunk of rhetoric drew thunderous applause, and for several reasons it is worthy of careful consideration.

For one, the President could not have conveyed his and his party?s desperation more clearly. ?Listen, kiddos,? Mr. Obama might just as well have said. ?I really, really, REALLY need ya to go out and vote for my party and my agenda in November, cuz this time around yer momma and daddy aren?t gonna??

But also noteworthy are the metaphors that the President was utilizing. It?s likely that most Americans, regardless of their age, still feel a sense of empathy when they are reminded of the slaves who were ?singin? freedom songs,? or the women who ?were out marchin? for the right to vote.? And perhaps we feel empathetic about workers who were ?organizing for the right to organize,? as well ? although it seems like President Obama?s word choice was a bit muddled here, and the impact of the ?workers? metaphor was a bit deflated.

But beyond drawing applause, and beyond engendering a sense of empathy for previous generations, what was the President attempting to accomplish with this section of the speech? Are we supposed to relate, somehow, to those who were held in a state of slavery, or to the women who were denied their right to vote?

In each of the historic examples that the President noted, there was a clearly defined category of oppressors, and a clearly defined category of victims. But what relevance do these metaphors have for us today, in the era of President Obama? Who, exactly, are the ?oppressors? in today?s America, and who among us is a victim? And who ? or what ? will save us?

Two years ago, John McCain and George W Bush were singled-out by Barack Obama as the oppressors that created plummeting real estate values, insolvent banks, rising healthcare costs and a plummeting stock market. Now, after nearly two years of applying his own ?cures? to the healthcare industry and the financial system, and after making himself the de-facto CEO of two car companies and multiple lending institutions, President Obama faces the wrath of adult voters over skyrocketing healthcare costs, double-digit unemployment, banks that won?t lend, and companies that won?t hire.

Adult Americans aren?t content to simply ?vote? every couple of years - we want expanded opportunity and a thriving private sector economy. Yet President Obama has created an expanded public sector, and greater government dependence. Americans also want lower healthcare costs and better healthcare options. Yet, President Obama has brought about a rise in healthcare costs, and an environment that will ultimately lead to fewer healthcare options.

What he once called an effort to ?spread the wealth around? is now becoming a situation where we are spreading around our misery. This could be ?progress,? as Obama defines it ? he has certainly been a harsh critic of American capitalism and prosperity ? or it could be failure, depending on what his real objectives might be.

Mr. President, ?hope? and ?change? are killing us, but how?s it workin? out for you? And what is ?progress? anyway?



"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2010, 11:08:26 PM »

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2010, 04:06:05 PM »
In an emotional campaign speech at the University of Wisconsin, President Obama admitted ?times are tough,? but urged supporters to ?keep believing that change is possible.? In this context, he sounded more like a protester than a president, ignoring the inconvenient fact that he and his allies have dominated government for two years.

He described slaves ?sitting around a fire singing freedom songs,? women marching for the right to vote, and workers struggling to organize unions ? who all knew that change would come, but didn?t know when. But his examples all involved very specific, focused reforms, and President Obama discussed no fresh agenda, no new directions for the next two years.

Vague invocations of change may work for a candidate, but they mean little from a president when the public feels the nation?s headed in the wrong direction.

What change?
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2010, 02:49:39 PM »
The Colbert Democrats
 
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, October 8, 2010


A president's first midterm election is inevitably a referendum on his two years in office. The bad news for Democrats is that President Obama's "reelect" number is 38 percent -- precisely Bill Clinton's in October 1994, the eve of the wave election that gave Republicans control of the House for the first time in 40 years.

Yet this same poll found that 65 percent view Obama favorably "as a person." The current Democratic crisis is not about the man -- his alleged lack of empathy, ability to emote, etc., requiring remediation with backyard, shirt-sleeved shoulder rubbing with the folks -- but about the policies.

And the problem with the policies is twofold: ideology and effectiveness.
First, Obama, abetted by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, tried to take a center-right country to the left. They grossly misread the 2008 election. It was a mandate to fix the economy and restore American confidence. Obama read it as a mandate to change the American social contract, giving it a more European social-democratic stamp, by fundamentally extending the reach and power of government in health care, energy, education, finance and industrial policy.

Obama succeeded with health care. Unfortunately for the Democrats, that and Obama's other signature achievement -- the stimulus -- were not exactly what the folks were clamoring for. What they wanted was economic recovery.

Here the Democrats failed the simple test of effectiveness. The economy is extraordinarily weak, unemployment is unacceptably high, and the only sure consequence of the stimulus is nearly $1 trillion added to the national debt in a single stroke.

And yet, to these albatrosses of ideological overreach and economic ineffectiveness, the Democrats have managed in the past few weeks to add a third indictment: incompetence.

For the first time since modern budgeting was introduced with the Budget Act of 1974, the House failed to even write a budget. This in a year of extraordinary deficits, rising uncertainty and jittery financial markets. Gold is going through the roof. Confidence in the dollar and the American economy is falling -- largely because of massive overhanging debt. Yet no budget emerged from Congress to give guidance, let alone reassurance, about future U.S. revenues and spending.

That's not all. Congress has not passed a single appropriations bill. To keep the government going, Congress passed a so-called continuing resolution (CR) before adjourning to campaign. The problem with continuing to spend at the current level is that the last two years have seen a huge 28 percent jump in non-defense discretionary spending. The CR continues this profligacy, aggravating an already serious debt problem.

As if this were not enough, Congress adjourned without even a vote -- nay, without even a Democratic bill -- on the expiring Bush tax cuts. This is the ultimate in incompetence. After 20 months of control of the White House and Congress -- during which they passed an elaborate, 1,000-page micromanagement of every detail of American health care -- the Democrats adjourned without being able to tell the country what its tax rates will be on Jan. 1.

It's not just income taxes. It's capital gains and dividends, too. And the estate tax, which will careen insanely from 0 to 55 percent when the ball drops on Times Square on New Year's Eve.

Nor is this harmless incompetence. To do this at a time when $2 trillion of capital is sitting on the sidelines because of rising uncertainty -- and there is no greater uncertainty than next year's tax rates -- is staggeringly irresponsible.

As if this display of unseriousness -- no budget, no appropriations bills, no tax bill -- were not enough, some genius on a House Judiciary subcommittee invites parodist Stephen Colbert to testify as an expert witness on immigration. He then pulls off a nervy mockery of the whole proceedings -- my favorite was his request to have his colonoscopy inserted in the Congressional Record -- while the chairwoman sits there clueless.

A fitting end for the 111th Congress. But not quite. Colbert will return to the scene of the crime on Oct. 30 as the leader of one of two mock rallies on the Mall. Comedian Jon Stewart leads the other. At a time of near-10 percent unemployment, a difficult and draining war abroad, and widespread disgust with government overreach and incompetence, they will light up the TV screens as the hip face of the new liberalism -- just three days before the election.

I suspect the electorate will declare itself not amused.
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Hope & Change....
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2010, 07:08:05 PM »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle