No, now you're misrpresenting me. While a reporter can be giddy to have said access, if a reporter abused their access, then their access is likely to be severely curtailed, if not abolished. Said reporter then would have to find access somewhere or with someone else
Remember, I never claimed bias was 100% one way, and 0% the other. The few supportive stories that reporters provide for the GOP is likely to give them continued access. The vast majority that abuse that, likely have far less access.
Understand yet?