One of MRC's complaints was how Williams treated Carter.
That wasn't in dispute
Whether Carter is one of the better ex-presidents is subjective, (you know what that means don't you?) so I'm not sure why MRC and you would list that as an example of Williams bias.
YOUR premice of whether Carter is a better ex-president, is subjective on top of subjective. Yea, all snide of yours aside, I do know what subjective is. Your beef, if you have one, is with Williams, if you believe that's what he was doing. The flaw is claiming that's what MRC was claiming he was doing. That's the flawed premice I don't agree with, nor see it in MRC. MRC is merely
reporting the platform that Williams, a reporter and prominent member of the MSM, provided an ex-president, without even a hint of trying to question the ex-president's credentials or allegations aimed at Fox
I happen to think Carter a much better ex-president than he was as a president. Of course that is my subjective opinion.
Good for you. Not an issue here though. the issue is as I explained above
It's kinda like bitching that Brown was responsible for California's pension woes, when further examination shows that was not the case.
WOW, you're going to pull that gross misrepresentation/fabrication again?? I think the term there is "desperate", or perhaps "grasping", at something that never was