The Census bereau eeed to indicate that the rates of poverty were very stable , the margin of error is nearly the same as the entire measured increase.
Also the increase was almost all in midwestern whites.
The national welth increases apace , it is not a bad thing that the rich get richer they can't help butr drag us along in their wake a they progress.
Jelosy tho would have the rich be penalised even if the pnalty would be shaed with peope who cannot afford it.
You have hit a new height of smarmy bullshit on this one. There is not one scintilla of evidence of any of this. It is all trickle down theory nonsense. The only thing that trickles down from the rich is the piss that shower the rest of US with.
What evidence supports your opinion?
In countrys with few rich people is there a larger middle class?
In times when the gap between rich and middle class and poor are shrinking , are the pople enoying good times?
It is my opinion that fortunes hire people , poverty doesn't , trickle down is not what we should call the Niagra like flow of a robust economy.
Were you under the imprssion that "trickle down " is a conservative concept? It is not , it is the dismissive term used by criics of capitolism who do not understand what conservaivs are talking about. Our favoriate and more apt term is a "riseing tide". I doubt that you can find any serious conservative speaking well of "trickle down".
Taxes are not the only thing that can ruin an economy , but when used to excess they are as sure as shootin as a means for causeing unemployment.
