Author Topic: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb  (Read 9833 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The_Professor

  • Guest
The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« on: October 09, 2006, 05:36:01 PM »
A Partisan Piece for your Discussion:

The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
Dave Eberhart, NewsMax.com
Monday, Oct. 9, 2006
 

 Flashback: North Korea Nukes Part of Clinton Legacy
 James Baker: Reconsidering Iraq Strategy
 Al Gore, Rupert Murdoch Join in TV Deal
 Howard Dean: Americans Can't Trust GOP
 
 
North Korea's first detonation of a nuclear weapon may have taken place during the watch of George W. Bush — but it was under the Clinton administration's watch that the communist regime began gathering necessary materials and constructing the bomb.

As Western powers race to confirm that North Korea did in fact explode a nuclear device in Gilju, a remote region in the Hamgyong province, some see it as a culmination of weak U.S. action during the 1990s that led to this fateful day.

Fateful Beginnings

After entering into an agreement with the United States in 1994, the Clinton administration ignored evidence the North Koreans were violating the agreement and continuing to build a nuclear weapon. "In July of 2002, documentary evidence was found in the form of purchase orders for the materials necessary to enrich uranium," NewsMax's James Hirsen previously reported.

"In October 2002, Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly met with his North Korean counterpart for scheduled talks. Kelly confronted North Korea with the tangible evidence of its duplicity. After a day of outright denial, North Korea abruptly reversed its position and defiantly acknowledged a secret nuclear program."

Timeline of a Nuclear Bomb

A review of recent history shows that that the Clinton administration gave up a clear and perhaps last best chance to nip the North Korean bomb in the bud:

1985: North Korea signs the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

1989: The Central Intelligence Agency discovers the North Koreans are building a reprocessing facility — a reactor capable of converting fuel rods into weapons-grade plutonium. The fuel rods were extracted 10 years before from that nation's Yongbyon reactor.

The rods represent a shortcut to enriched plutonium and an atomic bomb.

Spring, 1994: A year into President Clinton's first term, North Korea prepares to remove the Yongbyon fuel rods from their storage site. North Korea expels international weapons inspectors and withdraws from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Clinton asks the United Nations Security Council to consider sanctions. North Korean spokesmen proclaim such sanctions would cause war.

The Pentagon draws up plans to send 50,000 troops to South Korea — along with 400 war planes, 50 ships, Apache helicopters, Bradley fighting vehicles, and Patriot missiles. An advance force of 250 soldiers is sent in to set up headquarters for the expanded force.

Clinton balks and sets up a diplomatic back-channel to end the crisis — former President Jimmy Carter. Exceeding instructions, Carter negotiates the outlines of a treaty and announces the terms live on CNN.

Oct. 21, 1994: The United States and North Korea sign a formal accord based on those outlines, called the Agreed Framework. Under its terms:

North Korea promises to renew its commitment to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, lock up the fuel rods, and let inspectors back in to monitor the facility.

The United States agrees — with financial backing from South Korea and Japan — that it will provide two light-water nuclear reactors for electricity, send a large supply of fuel oil, and that it will not invade North Korea.

Upon delivery of the first light-water reactor, inspections of suspected North Korean nuclear sites were supposed to start. After the second reactor arrived, North Korea was supposed to ship its fuel rods out of the country.

The two countries also agreed to lower trade barriers and install ambassadors in each other's capitals — with the United States providing full assurances that it would never use nuclear weapons against North Korea.

(None of the above came to pass. Congress did not make the financial commitment — neither did South Korea. The light-water reactors were never funded. The enumerated steps toward normalization were never taken.)

Jan. 2002: In President Bush's State of the Union Address, he famously labels North Korea, Iran, and Iraq as an "axis of evil."

Oct., 2002: Officials from the U.S. State Department fly to Pyongyang, where that government admits it had acquired centrifuges for processing highly enriched uranium, which could be used for building nuclear weapons.

It is now clear to all parties that the promised reactors are never going to be built. Normalization of relations fizzles.

The CIA learns that North Korea may have been acquiring centrifuges for enriching uranium since the late 1990s — probably from Pakistan.

Oct. 20, 2002: Bush announces that the United States is formally withdrawing from the Carter-brokered 1994 agreement.

The United States. halts oil supplies to North Korea and urges other countries to cut off all economic relations with Pyongyang.

Dec., 2002: North Korea expels the international weapons inspectors, restarts the nuclear reactor at Yongbyon, and unlocks the container holding the fuel rods.

Jan. 10, 2003: North Korea withdraws from the Non-Proliferation Treaty — noting, however, that there would be a change of position if the U.S. resumed its obligations under the Agreed Framework and signed a non-aggression pledge.

March, 2003: President Bush orders several B-1 and B-52 bombers to the U.S. Air Force base in Guam — within range of North Korea.

April, 2003: North Korea's deputy foreign minister announces that his country now has "deterrent" nuclear weapons.

May, 2003: Bush orders the Guam-based aircraft back to their home bases.

October, 2003: The North Koreans announce they have reprocessed all 8,000 of their fuel rods and solved the technical problems of converting the plutonium into nuclear bombs.

source: NewsMax

domer

  • Guest
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2006, 07:23:22 PM »
Why you insist on treating us to this bullshit is beyond me, Professor. Anyhow, I thought this was Truman's legacy!

The_Professor

  • Guest
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2006, 07:38:32 PM »
Read the very first line of the post, Domer:

"A Partisan Piece for your Discussion:"


Many times, I find articles to post to stimulate discussion, whether I personally agree with them or not, ok?

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2006, 02:47:27 AM »
Whether Plutonium or enriched Urainium the explosion of an A-Bomb requires that some of the most precious meatal on Earth be destroyed.

The resorces required to make this bomb would have bought dozens of shiploads of grain .

Some estimates of the famine deaths in North Korea in the last fifteen years top two million , we can't really know they do not publish real information on such a subject.


But in the region of China adjoining the border of North Korea there is a serious problem with Koreans crossing the border with no ones permission and seeking work , depressing the wages of the Chineese.


How could Clinton , Carter or even Bush have anticipated that a nation so desprately poor that large numbers of its people are dieing of famine , where a Chineese Laborers wage looks good enough to migrate for, would choose to blow up such a lot of wealth?

In time of famine wealth is life , who will this wepon feed?


hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2006, 07:56:12 AM »
Clinton legacy?

Seems to me they took umbrage at being included in Bush's 'Axis of Evil', saw what happened to Iraq, and that's when the real problems started. relations with Kim Jong-Il under Clinton weren't great, but they deteriorated to this level under Bush.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2006, 08:16:59 AM »
There is an old saying about not pointing a gun at someone unless you plan to use it.

N. Korea, if they have atomoc weaponry, and that is not exactly clear, is certainly pointing a gun at countries withn reach of its missile technology.

Those countries were involved in the multilatral talks over the last 6 years.

And those countries will eventually have to deal with this threat as it escalates.

Diplomacy has the advantage of buying time for all concerned. Time for N. Korea to reconsider its path or to maximize its bargaining position. For Japan and South Korea it buys the time to develope countermeasures if needed. For China and Russia it gives them time to apply more diplomatic pressures. And for the US it alleviates the need to be the sole policeman of the world. I don't see the UN as a player in this.

Personally i am more concerned with N. Korea's counterfeiting and sale of missile technology than i am with their chest thumping about nukes.

 

The_Professor

  • Guest
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2006, 01:18:43 PM »
Excellent point, BT. North Korea desperately needs hard currency and an excellent method might be selling thier nuclear knowledge to scumbags. How might we deter this?

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2006, 01:23:27 PM »
Quote
There is an old saying about not pointing a gun at someone unless you plan to use it.


There is another old saying, that God created man, but Sam Colt made them equal. Perhaps North Korea sees having 'nucular' weapons as the international equivalent of that.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2006, 01:34:54 PM »
I'm sure N.Korea feels justified in its pursuit. Apparently you agree with them.

But when push comes to shove i wouldn't bet on N. Korea coming out on top in any war with its neighbors or us for that matter.


hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2006, 01:49:58 PM »
Quote
Apparently you agree with them.

How do you figure? Just because I can see both sides of an argument does not mean I am taking either side. I'm just making the example that, if you want to quote old homilies, you can find one to fit just about any circumstance.

Kind of like verses in the Bible.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

_JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3500
  • Salaires legers. Chars lourds.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2006, 02:17:59 PM »
Quote
But when push comes to shove i wouldn't bet on N. Korea coming out on top in any war with its neighbors or us for that matter.

It isn't about coming out on top. For a despotic regime like North Korea, it is all about survival. An atomic weapon simply adds to the guarantee of survival. Look at the threats they are receiving now. Sanctions? Isolation? How are you going to further isolate the most isolated nation in the world?

hnumpah is correct, I believe, that this is primarily a defensive move. North Korea is saying to the rest of the world: "You may hate us. You may wish to be rid of us. But if you try anything, then the blood of Tokyo, or Seoul is on your hands. We may miss. But we might not. Are you willing to take that risk?"

Sure, North Korea is likely not to win the war - but at what cost are you willing to invade them and find out? I think that is the ultimate question. We have a 60 year-old technology that more nations will discover and pursue. The world may look quite different in two or three decades, where interventionist policies won't be so easily undertaken.
I smell something burning, hope it's just my brains.
They're only dropping peppermints and daisy-chains
   So stuff my nose with garlic
   Coat my eyes with butter
   Fill my ears with silver
   Stick my legs in plaster
   Tell me lies about Vietnam.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2006, 02:49:53 PM »
I'm not sure an invasion would be necessary.

And i don't think this is a defensive posture. I think it is a ratcheting up of the anty as it goes about its gangster business of extortion.


sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2006, 04:14:02 PM »
Quote
There is an old saying about not pointing a gun at someone unless you plan to use it.

There is another old saying, that God created man, but Sam Colt made them equal. Perhaps North Korea sees having 'nucular' weapons as the international equivalent of that.

Or, since no one has demonstrated any overt act of provocation that would require such a need, perhaps his blowing up of a nucular dud, is simply to get more bargaining power in getting sanctions lifted, or perhaps to negotiate a way to get Clinton to give him some more nucular reactors
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2006, 07:55:37 PM »
Quote
Or, since no one has demonstrated any overt act of provocation that would require such a need...

Um, you mean, like lumping North Korea with with Iraq and Iran as part of some mythical 'Axis of Evil', then invading Iraq, and making threatening noises against Iran? Sure, Kim's a nutjob, but if you extend that line of thinking and consider the possibility he might be a paranoid nutjob, you can see where he might figure it is in his best interests to arm himself as best he can, just in case.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Clinton Legacy: North Korea's Bomb
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2006, 08:34:22 PM »
you mean, like lumping North Korea with with Iraq and Iran as part of some mythical 'Axis of Evil'

And "talk" now amounts to putting Missile guided Cruisers off it's coast, and F/A 18's flying along it's border?  Reagan's "tear down this wall" speech is pretty much the same thing as what Bush stated.  I don't recall Russia conducting a bunch of nucular tests in preparation for the impending U.S. attack

making threatening noises against Iran?

The "threatening noises" are in specific RESPONSE to their drive for a nucular weapon.  Not the other way a round, I'm afraid H
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle