Author Topic: The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom  (Read 881 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Religious Dick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1153
  • Drunk, drunk, drunk in the gardens and the graves
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom
« on: December 12, 2007, 07:45:50 PM »

The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom
By SIMON CALDWELL

Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change prophets of doom, warning them that any solutions to global warming must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology.

The leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics suggested that fears over man-made emissions melting the ice caps and causing a wave of unprecedented disasters were nothing more than scare-mongering.

The German-born Pontiff said that while some concerns may be valid it was vital that the international community based its policies on science rather than the dogma of the environmentalist movement.

His remarks will be made in his annual message for World Peace Day on January 1, but they were released as delegates from all over the world convened on the Indonesian holiday island of Bali for UN climate change talks.

The 80-year-old Pope said the world needed to care for the environment but not to the point where the welfare of animals and plants was given a greater priority than that of mankind.

"Humanity today is rightly concerned about the ecological balance of tomorrow," he said in the message entitled "The Human Family, A Community of Peace".

"It is important for assessments in this regard to be carried out prudently, in dialogue with experts and people of wisdom, uninhibited by ideological pressure to draw hasty conclusions, and above all with the aim of reaching agreement on a model of sustainable development capable of ensuring the well-being of all while respecting environmental balances.

"If the protection of the environment involves costs, they should be justly distributed, taking due account of the different levels of development of various countries and the need for solidarity with future generations.

"Prudence does not mean failing to accept responsibilities and postponing decisions; it means being committed to making joint decisions after pondering responsibly the road to be taken."

Efforts to protect the environment should seek "agreement on a model of sustainable development capable of ensuring the well-being of all while respecting environmental balances", the Pope said.

He added that to further the cause of world peace it was sensible for nations to "choose the path of dialogue rather than the path of unilateral decisions" in how to cooperate responsibly on conserving the planet.

The Pope's message is traditionally sent to heads of government and international organisations.

His remarks reveal that while the Pope acknowledges that problems may be associated with unbridled development and climate change, he believes the case against global warming to be over-hyped.

A broad consensus is developing among the world's scientific community over the evils of climate change.

But there is also an intransigent body of scientific opinion which continues to insist that industrial emissions are not to blame for the phenomenon.

Such scientists point out that fluctuations in the earth's temperature are normal and can often be caused by waves of heat generated by the sun. Other critics of environmentalism have compared the movement to a burgeoning industry in its own right.

In the spring, the Vatican hosted a conference on climate change that was welcomed by environmentalists.

But senior cardinals close to the Vatican have since expressed doubts about a movement which has been likened by critics to be just as dogmatic in its assumptions as any religion.

In October, the Australian Cardinal George Pell, the Archbishop of Sydney, caused an outcry when he noted that the atmospheric temperature of Mars had risen by 0.5 degrees celsius.

"The industrial-military complex up on Mars can't be blamed for that," he said in a criticism of Australian scientists who had claimed that carbon emissions would force temperatures on earth to rise by almost five degrees by 2070 unless drastic solutions were enforced.


Find this story at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=501316&in_page_id=1811
?2007 Associated New Media

I speak of civil, social man under law, and no other.
-Sir Edmund Burke

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8010
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2007, 09:48:16 PM »
but is it ok to not litter?
the whole theme of global warming is to not litter.
if global warming false would that promote littering?
is it really bad to recycle?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2007, 10:58:39 PM »
I don't think that I will assume that the Pope is any sort of environmental scientist. I don't think anyone should assume this, either.

I am not going to ask Al Gore about the doctrine of transubstantiation or the miracles of St Thomas Aquinas, either.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2007, 11:46:52 PM »
Quote
I don't think that I will assume that the Pope is any sort of environmental scientist. I don't think anyone should assume this, either.

Nor should Al Gore be considered an environmental scientist.

But the Pope does bring up some points i agree with.

Throughout the ages people have exploited potential or real disasters to further their own agendas.

Cases in point include the Cold War and 9-11.

Is Homeland Security proportional to 9-11.  I don't think so, i think it is overkill. Just as the Kyoto Accords and more importantly its exemptions is an overreaction to possible causes to global warming. Is it possible the environmental movement has been hijacked? Certainly.

Quote
The 80-year-old Pope said the world needed to care for the environment but not to the point where the welfare of animals and plants was given a greater priority than that of mankind.

A perfect example of this is placing the well being of mollusks and sturgeon ahead of metro Atlantans by continuing to draw down the water supply in the middle of the worst drought of the century.

All in all the Popes statement is reasonable.