I guess that some donors don't mind feeding the lily, but rebel at gilding the lily. Or gilding thee Sarah, in this case.
Would they have also been okay with paying for John Edward's expensive haircuts? As I recall, the Republicans made a really big deal about pricey haircuts. The issue here is that if you run on the platform of being "one of the people", do you stop being "one of the people" when you seek to go out and show the people that you are both "one of the people", and yet somehow qualified to LEAD the same people.
No one seems to actually want to follow Joe the Plumber, and even less "Joe Sixpack", whoever the Hell he might be.
Will Sara continue to eat mooseburgers once the GOP has stuffed her freezer with filet mignons? Will she lose her taste for mooseburgers and therefore side with the Friends of the Moose anti-moose hunting coalition? Or will she just look down her nose at anyone who is still eating mooseburgers?
I remember in 1952, some reporter took a shot of the sole of Adlai Stevenson's shoe, which had a hole in it. The Democrats used it to demonstrate that the somewhat intellectual Adlai was one of the folks. The Republicans made a bunch of signs with the holey sole and the legend "Don't let this happen to you", which I guess was supposed to suggest that the Democrats wanted the postwar economic slump that was going on at the time to continue.
I was every bit as dumb as the Joe the Plumber and the Pitbull with Lipstick schtick we have been forced to endure.
I imagine that Hillary probably paid for her own suits (clothes), and almost certainly the suites of furniture in her home, (as in bedroom suites, living room suites) but her campaign paid for her suites (as in hotel suites).
But Hillary was not trying to sell herself as one of the mooseburger-eating, coupon cutting, beer-swilling middle class, was she?
People who sell furniture always fail to distinguish the pronunciation of suit (rhymes with toot) and suite (rhymes with tweet).