This place wouldn't be the same without its flame wars.
That, I believe, is the point.
If you are going to have a "no-flames" policy in effect, I think it should start with the first stone thrown (sorry for the mixed metaphor) and not wait until the guy who responds naturally has to be lumped in with the instigator.
If someone "responds naturally" by acting like a jerk, he should be excoriated just as much as the individual who "threw the first stone." In fact, given the nature of this forum it is likely that the person "responding naturally" will see and respond to the "first stone" prior to the moderators seeing and responding. Furthermore, it is a rationalization to equate a "natural response" to a retaliatory flame. Rather than "respond naturally" I think it would be better to "respond responsibly." (I guess, if we use those "cover our ass" alcohol ads the booze companies air as a frame of reference for that slogan, that means either don't respond too much or don't respond while driving!)
The flame wars only male this place interesting for flamers. The debate is what I come here for. That's one reason I give up on the flame wars more than I used to. What's the point. I don't evern bother with many of the posters on this site because they never offer anything worth reading. Frankly, Michael, I ignored your repeated posts about McCain's "phony torture" because I wouldn't be civil in such a debate. I won't lump you, personally, with those who add virtually nothing substantive to this forum because you do make good points from time to time and you have half a brain (the left half, apparently
. But I will much more gladly engage in a debate (even one that may get heated) with people like UP, Ami, BT, Sirs, Plane, Domer, Lanya, XO, fatman, Cindy and others. Even some of the old shouting matches I used to have with Mint and (damn I miss) terra were often substantive behind the emotion. I'd love to see Leslie (Plum) and Kim around here. Freak was another A-1 debater. Each of these might get mad and even throw an insult in heated debate. But they didn't make a point of it (OK, maybe Terra did occasionally
). Most of what they wrote was interesting and worth reading and responding to.
Wouldn't be the same? Wouldn't that be great?