Aside from Cindy's personal tirade against Clinton, whom I have many problems with, but his sleeping partners are not one of them - she does begin a point I have always been fascinated with.
There are many strong, and intelligent women in the political world. I'm sure someday we shall see a woman change the course of this country at the highest level.
Of course we have already seen women change the course of not only American history, but world history. That is not in question. Will we see a female president of the United States? Of course.
What amazes me in the modern Republican Party is that the most keenly intelligent members are never presented on a national stage. Before the hateful replies begin, I don't mean that the Democrats are all smarter by any means. Both parties have their highly intelligent academics and both have their "who would you rather have a beer with?" candidates. And no, having a graduate degree is not an automatic qualification for being highly intelligent or intellectual.
Yet, if we look at the primary race we can see that someone like Mitt Romney shows a lot of intelligence (whether one agrees with him or not). Senator McCain is someone who is by no means an idiot, but is an average guy who had he not been shot down over Vietnam would likely have been a career captain in the Navy and eventually found to a desk job in Washington. Senator Obama, on the other hand, is an exceptionally intelligent individual who has shown a ruthlessness in his political acumen (read about his quick climb in the pugilist world of Chicago politics).
I wonder if some of that has to do with the anti-intellectualism and anti-elitism notions that prevail with Republican voters, especially amongst evangelicals. Sarah Palin is a lightweight. It has nothing to do with her gender, her hobbies, or her state of origin. It is her. She has a ruthless political side, but such little intelligence to back it up. And one has to ask, why didn't they select a Republican woman with much more intelligence and a better standing? Why not Lingle of Hawaii? She has more experience and in a Democratic state. How many GOP congresswomen are there? None of them are smarter, better candidates?
This idea of "executive experience" is justification after the fact. The GOP's first President was just a Congressman and he inherited a hell of a lot worse crisis than anything we've faced since. Running a business? Have you ever met some of these business owners? Have you sat down with some of them and really talked? Some are brilliant. Some are friggin' morons and you wouldn't want them running your local parks, let alone the country.
I'm not buying it. I have nothing against Palin personally, but politically she's a lightweight. And what really amazes me is that the GOP has this knack of electing and selecting sub-par candidates. Not that the Democrats are shining stars, but they did well in 2000 and I think they've done well this year.