Nothing's been retracted, only a denouncement of your efforts on perverting my original answer. And no, the "happens to" was again an effort to demonstrate how you were wrong in your original conclusion. Nothing dishonest about it, as I made it clear that I added it. Didn't think it was needed, but with the ongoing perversion efforts, apparently it was. And apparently effective in even better outlining my point, otherwise you wouldn't be trying to connect some dishonest tag to it
And now the added perversion of trying to tweak to imply I'm advocating abortion. Good god
If you wish this to continue, please try to get serious, and ask a simple question. Otherwise I think we're done, and you, Xo, and BnonameB can continue with the perversion party