I bet that all 19 of the Republican'ts who want to lead this country have a plan to cut taxes, and a goodly number of then actually believe that cutting taxes always raises revenues as per the Theory of the Sacred Laffer Curve Cocktail Napkin.
And all of them no doubt disagrees with whatever Obama does about Yemen, though it would be expecting far too much for them to have a coherent policy about Yemen related to policy.
Problem is there are three factions in Yemen: (1) the Sunni faction, that is on Al Qaeda's side, supported by those eternal pals of democracy, the Saudis. (2) The Shia faction, supported by Hezbollah and their pals, the Iranians and (3) The Houthis, another Shiite group that includes in its motto, 'Death to America, Death to Israel'.
The fourth group, the Democracy-loving, diversity- supporting, pro Israeli, pro American Yemenis, alas, does not exist.
The end quite often justifies the means: if I wish to get rich in the stock market, this justifies the means, which is to put money in the stock market. The means of heating a large pan of it is easily justified by the fried chicken that results from this action. Every politician must raise money to run, because we have unlimited primaries and no public funding. The means to get elected is raising that money. Poor John Boulton is not taken seriously, even though he really wants to be president, but very few will give him money, no matter what he promises. He will therefore never attain his end, no matter how corrupt he is willing to be.