Gay Forum for Democratic Candidates Tonight

[Richpo64]

Gay Forum for Democratic Candidates Tonight
By Amanda Carpenter
Thursday, August 9, 2007

Democrats running for their party?s nomination for President will openly discuss gay, lesbian and transgender issues in a forum sponsored by a gay rights group Thursday evening, which could hurt them in the polls of early swing states.

Candidates will be questioned on their support for gay rights in an event sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign and Viacom Inc.?s gay broadcast channel, Logo, in Los Angeles. It will be aired on the cable Logo station and live-streamed on www.logoonline.com at 9 p.m. eastern.

Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.), former North Carolina senator. John Edwards, former governor Mike Gravel of Alaska, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) and Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico will participate. Sen. Joe Biden (Del.) and Sen. Chris Dodd (Conn.) will not attend.

At the forum, each candidate will answer questions for 18 minutes related, but not limited, to gay marriage, federal hate crimes legislation, increased funding for HIV/AIDS treatment and the military?s ?don?t ask, don?t tell? policy.

Gay rights activist Margaret Carlson will moderate and questioners will include HRC President Joe Solmonese, openly gay Washington Post editorial page writer Jonathan Capehard and lesbian singer Melissa Etheridge.

A poll released August 8 by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute showed that an endorsement from a gay rights group could turn off twice as many voters as it attracts.

In a Wednesday press conference at the National Press Club, Quinnipiac University Polling Institute assistant research director Peter Brown explained, ?In Ohio, for instance, ten percent of the voters say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate endorsed by a gay rights group, but 34 percent would be less likely.?

Brown also said their poll, which tested voters in the swing states in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, found that endorsements from pro-abortion groups and business interests would have a negative effect on voters in those states.

The HRC/Logo event rounds out a flurry of recent events sponsored by special interest groups in to feel out the candidate?s positions on a variety of liberal issues. In the past week alone, the candidates campaigned at a left-wing blogger convention sponsored by DailyKos and at a televised debate put on by the AFL-CIO. Other recent Democratic presidential events have been organized by the open borders immigration group National Council of La Raza and Planned Parenthood.

Those campaigning for the Democratic nomination have been willing to schedule time for liberal special interests, but have spiked events that could appeal to moderate audiences.

Democratic candidates nixed a debate co-sponsored by Fox News Channel and the Congressional Black Caucus earlier this year. They also spurred an event hosted by the centrist Democratic Leadership Council that was founded by the former president Bill Clinton.



Amanda Carpenter is National Political Reporter for Townhall.com..

[sirs]

Do you think there'd be the same civil respect and media puff, if this was a Republican debate in front of..................oh, let's say the Christian Coalition?  Now THAT would be pandering       

[The_Professor]

"Those campaigning for the Democratic nomination have been willing to schedule time for liberal special interests, but have spiked events that could appeal to moderate audiences. "

Why does the Democratic Party insist on pandering ot the extremes of their Party? What about those Reagan Democrats, the moderates? Who is looking after THEIR interests?

[Plane]

Does this reveil some truth to us about the canadates ?

Or is it an artifact of the process we are useing for chooseing?

[The_Professor]

Your question mark key is overusing itself.  Declarative versus interrrogative is sometimes the correct approach. Interrogatives in quantity are http://www.thefreedictionary.com/irritating

[Plane]

Your question mark key is overusing itself.  Declarative versus interrogative is sometimes the correct roaf. Interrogatives in quantity are http://www.thefreedictionary.com/irritating

Do you think you would have been a good student for Socrates?

[The_Professor]

Not if it was the majority of what I say.

[Plane]

Not if it was the majority of what I say.

Socraties was known to teach with questions , but I wonder if he allowed his students to answer with qestions?

[The_Professor]

You just can't help yourself, can you? Is there a 12-Step program for this?

[Christians4LessGvt]

[Richpo64]

>>You just can't help yourself, can you? Is there a 12-Step program for this?<<

<chuckle>

[Michael Tee]

What if people who respond one way to a polling question dealing with the direct effect of a gay endorsement would actually respond a different way in their actual vote?  Because if there's a one-to-one correspondence, the gay-rights endorsement would have to be the kiss of death and these Democrats would be running up for the smooch.  Are they THAT stupid?

If the poll really predicted loss of votes, why wouldn't the Democrats keep silent on gay issues and run secure in the knowledge they'd get the gay vote anyway (sealed in by the Republicans' Constitutional Amendment nonsense) and avoid pissing off any closet bigots who were going to go Democratic on other more vital (to them) issues?

[The_Professor]

MT, again, you ask interesting questions, questions I do not have an answer for. Perhaps the Left does?