General Category > 3DHS

Reagan Amnesty take II?

<< < (3/3)

BT:
I agree defining securing the border as meaning only a wall is a marketing and strategic mistake. Use the best means available for the locale. and of course the reason for securing the border is so that we don't have to make compassionate exceptions to immigration policy every 5 years. It's for the children.

sirs:

--- Quote from: kimba1 on September 28, 2017, 03:40:27 AM ---why focus only on the wall ?

--- End quote ---

A ) because a wall is a tangible object, that has a direct effect at impeding illegal border crossings (Just ask Israel......and anyone that built a fence around their homes).  Nor can it be revoked by an executive order.  It stands, until its physically torn down

B ) It's been demonstrated time and time again, that the Democrats (and many Republicans as well) have no will to want to enforce our border & immigration laws.  Republicans fed by business lobbiests want the cheap labor, Democrats want the future votes.  They'll talk "comprehensive immigration reform", which apparently is code for tangible amnesty but only token speak of actual enforcment of immigration law

So, if they want "comprehensive immigration reform", it MUST start with a wall, because the "promise" of one later, holds no credible water, what-so-ever, given past history.  And if Trump renigs on perhaps the biggest campaign pledge, that got him elected, he'll be a 1 term President.  Simple as that

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page