What if?

[Michael Tee]

<<Sure it did. The fact that it was nothing more than a troll post is the entire reason why I didn't deal with it.>>

You obviously don't know what the hell you are talking about, and apparently don't even know what a troll post is.  The discussion is useless and pointless.

[sirs]

The discussion is useless and pointless.

As was your original post to this thread.  Get some sleep, Tee

[Amianthus]

You obviously don't know what the hell you are talking about, and apparently don't even know what a troll post is.  The discussion is useless and pointless.

Yes, a discussion about someone's trolling behaviour is usually useless and pointless.

However, from the Internet Troll section of Wikipedia, one of the examples of "trolling posts" is given as "Opinionated statements: Posting messages expressing their own opinions as generally accepted facts without offering any proof or analysis." This is an apt description of many of your posts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

[Michael Tee]

<<"Opinionated statements: Posting messages expressing their own opinions as generally accepted facts without offering any proof or analysis." This is an apt description of many of your posts.>>

Still more bullshit.  The post in question was a SPECULATION, a theory, and clearly offered as such, even in the title.  As for "an apt description of many of my posts," there's a lot of posts out there.  I'll defend any one of them, or not, on its merits, but in your typical bullshit fashion, you prefer to spread blanket accusations indicting hundreds of posts without bothering to specify any.  Typical bullshit conservative response - - can't answer the post, attack the poster.

[Amianthus]

Still more bullshit.  The post in question was a SPECULATION, a theory, and clearly offered as such, even in the title.

And you said a lot of the same things previously, claiming them as "fact" or "obvious." Just because you now try to coat the statements as "theory" (even though a theory actually requires evidence, which you have yet to provide for many of your claims) does not make this post any less of a troll.

[Plane]

What if a bunch of conservative billionaires started to worry about the growing ...

What's a self-respecting crypto-fascist to do?  Fortunately, they don't give a shit.  They don't have to.  They don't need to WIN elections any more.  Stealing them is good enough, and they have THAT down to a science.

When you cannot prove a point does it help to gather a lot of other unproveable points together and present them all at once?

I am sure you do beleive that the root problem is American greed for oil , or more precicely , the rich Americans greed for the cash that oil produces but I think that the problerm you first postulated includes within it a better answer.

    India and China are indeed resurgant and Americans with money are investing cash there prepareing to ride the surgeing economys of Asia like big league surfers.

     Boeing has a big plant in China ,  many others too, though China is hard to qualify for,almost every Company in the western world has an Indian Branch.

       Most of the large companys of Europe and the USA are eager to ensure that China and India have the resorces required to keep on makeing money.