You just can't make this stuff up

[sirs]

Once again, another example of if this were happending under a Republican administration, not only would many a politician be looking for a new job in the private sector, but ther'e be calls for prosecution, if not impeachment

Remember the name......Catherine Duval

It seems now, that the gal that was in charge of "releasing" and/or answering all concreassional inquiries for all those Lois Lerner e-mails, that were supposedly lost (RIGHT at the time they were being requested by congress), but appatently not lost, but not turned over, because they're either lost, or there needs to be a determination of any duplicates, etc., etc., ...... well now she's in charge in the release and/or inquiry to any Hillary e-mails, that supposedly were completely deleted from her very own private server, except for the ones that weren't, but also can't be fully released because....well, we just have to take their word for it, that everything is just fine.

[Plane]

  Generally ,the existence of a coverup and the process of stonewalling indicate a strong need for a coverup and a problem worthy of the effort of stonewalling.

    We really don't need the fine details , the effort expended in the burial indicate the level of shame.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Once more sirs, lamenting the lack of perceived symmetry in the universe.

We know how to torture sirs:

Shave off HALF his hair.

[sirs]

And once again, Dr Deflection attempts to change the subject into some non-existent search for symmetry.   Same 'ol, same 'ol

[Xavier_Onassis]

Most of your stipid rants are complaints about all the unjust flak Republican'ts would get if they did thre same thing as this or that "Liberal".
Reality just does not have enough injustice for you to rant about sirs. You need to constantly invent unreal crap from your tiny, afflicted mind to bitch about.

This is no deflection: the issue is YOU and your unending blather about how indignant the world would be if XYZ were to occur.

[sirs]

Pointing out rank bias in the MSM isn't some need to see a similar rank bias in the support of Republican endeavors.  Nor am I inventing anything, when its merely being pointed out.  But cudos on the deflection efforts.  Anything and everything to avoid the topic of the same person that ran the Lerner e-mail debacle, now in charge of Hillary's

[Xavier_Onassis]

Like anyone gives a shit, sirs.
Go to Benghazi.

[sirs]

We've ALL been trying to go to Benghazi, as it relates to what happened, and the massive cover-up involved.  Thanks to the MSM & this administration, in particular the lap dog of a Justice Dept, obstructing & delaying, in every possible way, then has the gall to critique this as having happened "so long ago"

It'll be interesting the level of scrutiny Miss Duval will be placed under, and at what point a smoking gun of a crack develops

[Xavier_Onassis]

Like anyone actually gives a shit.

[sirs]

Well of course the willing sycophants don't care.  The rest of the electorate just might however

[Xavier_Onassis]

Very questionable.

Reagan sold weapons to the Ayatollah and then gave the money to the Nicaraguan contras in direct violation of a congressional ban.
That had no effect on people's opinion of Reagan. Itv was too complicated to put on a bumpersticker.

[sirs]

Which again has absolutely squat to do with anything in this thread.   Its not even a rational tangent.  Just yet another deflection.  *sigh*

[Plane]

Once more sirs, lamenting the lack of perceived symmetry in the universe.

Well what of it?

Are you happy with belonging to the party that loads the dice?

[Xavier_Onassis]

The dice SHOULD be loaded against the Republican'ts, because they are warmongering, greedhead assholes.

[Plane]

The dice SHOULD be loaded against the Republican'ts, because they are warmongering, greedhead assholes.

This is a pretty frank admission.

But how do Democrats avoid accusations of greed?

Not by failing to accumulate lots of money.

Certainly not by being more charitable.