Best refer to that mirrow when you're claiming how someone else should look at themselves. Completely missing the point. The media isn't a pie, where they have only so much allocation to provide to a candidate's f-ups. Clinton's f-ups are far more egregious in the scheme of running the country. Trump could have been the poster child of decorum, but he'd still be the GOP candidate, and as such would still be treated with a saturation of whatever smearing negative news was found, while Clinton's disaster of a resume' for President would continue to be ignored
Point being, no one is defending Trump, outside of Cu4 perhaps. No one is denying the idiot comments he makes. I'm still waiting for an answer as to your apparent defending of Clinton, and denying her pathological lying to congress, the FBI, and the American people, much of it having to do with National Security issues. And that doesn't even start to touch the fin of the stench of the Clinton Foundations end around campaign finance laws, as it relates to foreign donors. All of which is getting barely a mention from the media, while they at the same time pile onto Trump's crude comments made years ago
And whatever the GOP did in supporting Trump, the Democrat party, which was manipulated in large part by Clinton and the DNC to deny Sanders even a chance at the nomination (which apparently you don't have a problem with) chose the most corrupt politician, in perhaps the history of this nation, to be their nominee for President. But yea, let's dump on Trump & the GOP, while ignoring the 500lb donkey in the room. Are you sure you're not a member of the media?
And its not arguing....its called debate
