DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Christians4LessGvt on May 17, 2012, 11:48:55 AM
-
Hopefully Nebraska sends this lady to the US Senate!
A check from Texas is headed to the Cornhusker state today!
Deb Fischer - Trusted Conservative (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjPkgU0ZZDw#ws)
http://www.debfischer2012.com/thank-you-nebraska/ (http://www.debfischer2012.com/thank-you-nebraska/)
-
Yeah sure, Ron Paul won't be running and we really need this.
She's been profiting from grazing cattle on government land in Cherry County for all her life. Now she wants another government check for balancing the budget. Yeah, that'll happen.
-
She's been profiting from grazing cattle on government land in Cherry County for all her life.
Lie #1.
plus even if your lie were true, her husband is a rancher,
the gvt leases grazing land to ranchers...
the ranchers are in business to raise livestock
the ranchers do not set the price nor do they control the land.
the gvt has been leasing grazing range since at least 1934 & really long before that
to blame or demonize the ranchers for the gvt deciding to
lease land to ranchers seems rather silly.
Now she wants another government check for balancing the budget. Yeah, that'll happen.
Typical liberal ....up is down and down is up.... that it's unreasonable
to demand a balanced budget from our government.
Every issue in her ad makes logical sense and needs to be done.
Hopefully the people in Nebraska send her to Washington
and we can begin correcting this historcal Obama disaster!
-
Electing yet another hick from the sticks is not a fix.
She is running against Bob Kerrey, who has been governor of Nebraska, S Senator from Nebraska, and has a Congressional Medal of Honor.
He was not defeated from the Senate, he simply did not run for reelection.
So experience in the Senate and the Governorship and a Medal of Honor are not as big a deal as the endorsement of National Dingbat Sarah Palin.
-
I'm sure Bob Kerrey is a fine man. However he is choosing to run again in a state that is decidedly red and where Palins endorsement means something. Otherwise why would Obama have had to bribe Ben Nelson to vote for ObamaCare.
-
Electing yet another hick from the sticks is not a fix.
oh like the guy from Harvard now in the
White House has done such a good job!
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/ItsZep/Politics/732c42a9.jpg)
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/ItsZep/Politics/bb859e96.gif)
(http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/obama-worst-president.jpg)
-
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/ItsZep/Politics/732c42a9.jpg)
WOW....I really haven't been fully appreciative of how Newt and the GOP House was able to keep deficit spending down so well. Goes to show you how polarized things have truely gotten under Obama's "leadership"
I'm also betting that the Dem controlled senate passed their own budgets, each and every year, as Constitutionally required
-
What does National Dingbat Sarah Palin have to do with Ben Nelson acting like a dick.
Note that his special favor was not in the final bill.
Teabaggers have had no influence on slowing the growth of the national debt. Mostly, they have served only to petrify the status quo and prevent anything from happening.
Another hick from the sticks will not be useful. Sarah Palin has not been useful to anyone other than herself.
-
The Cornhusker kickback was in the final bill
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska_Compromise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska_Compromise)
-
And of course, this woman would be against it. She is likely to be against any healthcare bill.
So Nebraskans who want to feel "special" will vote for Kerrey.
-
And of course, this woman would be against it. She is likely to be against any healthcare bill.
If it's anything like Obamination Care, she'd be a shoe-in for winning
So Nebraskans who want to feel "special" will vote for Kerrey.
Boy, doesn't that sum up the left's approach to problem solving, nicely
-
Well, wouldn't they? I am merely speculating. My powers over Nebraska voters are nil.
ANY healthcare bill is better than none. Any bill that we have could be improved upon. Throwing it all out and allowing a bunch of fatcats to dawdle over it for another 40 years is sucky and stupid.
-
Well, wouldn't they? I am merely speculating. My powers over Nebraska voters are nil.
Strange how no one even implied you had such powers. But yea, they'd elect her in a heartbeat, if she came out against any form of Government mandated healthcare
ANY healthcare bill is better than none.
WRONG.......on SO MANY LEVELS. It's one of the reasons the Dems got spanked the last election cycle. "We have to pass it, in order to see what's in it" Good gravy, one of the most moronic things any elected politician has EVER said
-
ANY healthcare bill is better than none.
Wow, just wow.
Lots of laws and regulatiions exist that are worse than none, I wonder if you suffer a lack of imagination.
-
The health of the people is the health of the nation.
If the ACA is abolished, we will not ever relace it with anything better.
==================================================
Some Valentine County cowgirl is unlikely to be of any use at all at coming up with something better. Senator/ Governor/ Medal of Honor winner Kerrey is many, many MANY times more qualified than this Palin-supported yokel.
-
The health of the people is the health of the nation.
If the ACA is abolished, we will not ever relace it with anything better.
Why do you think that this Big Pharma, Big Lawyer, Big Insurance Full Employment Act is the best we can do?
-
It is obviously NOT the "best we can do". But it is better than nothing. Nothing is what the Republicans want. If they wanted a decent plan, they should have cooperated on this one.
-
In this case, nothing, ie maintaining the status quo, would be better than ObamaCare.
How can front ending costs and backending benefits be better than what we had?
And please don't try to shift this monstrosity onto the GOP, they were cut out of negotiations from the gitgo.
-
Now people will not be bankrupted by medical bills.
The stupid Republicans were not "cut out" of anything. They simply cut themselves out, because they were only interested in "making Obama a one-term president".
I have no respect for their sorry, hateful asses and hope they become extinct.
-
Your disrespect for them, should have zero effect on telling the true story of how that bill got passed.
-
States , concerns , companys, etc. that had enough clout or barganing position got special exemptions for themselves written into the bill.
If it was really good wouldn't the guys with clout want more not less?
I don't want to pay so much medical bill that I can't pay anything elese , but is the best alternitive to pay so much tax that the economy entirely collapses?
Already we depend disproportionatly on the high taxes paid by a small sector of high earners, do we love or hate these guys?
How many are we going to chase to Singapore before we get the message?
-
Already we depend disproportionatly on the high taxes paid by a small sector of high earners, do we love or hate these guys?
And yet, THIS is the campaign approach by Obama & Company. To demagogue the fewer & fewer folks that are to pay for their utopion madness. And as earlier articles have demonstrating, higher taxes not only barely scrapes the debt, not only does it hardly pay for their astronimcal social expeditures, but its fixated on an extremely volatile demographic, where "the rich" can lose millions, if not billions in bad investments and/or overzealous regulations that cripple business progress. Just look at California.
Then where do they go?