DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Christians4LessGvt on January 01, 2015, 12:53:25 PM
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn2eDyaq3mQ
The gentle GIANT Yea?
A video taken from a cell phone, showing how Michael Brown...(yes, the one and the same)....treats a senior black male.
This 300 lb. young boy (that's what media calls him) is the same Michael Brown that attempted to take a gun away from a
police officer and paid with his life. Here is the fellow that all of the riots are about. Videos don't lie.
You will not see this in the media.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, the Grand Jury got it ALL WRONG.....Ha Ha
-
You realize of course, the good Professor will hyperbolically proclaim how this act supposedly thus justifies his being executed by the police....completely missing the point of the article, while once again deflecing to an issue, that has long since been decided by a grand jury
-
Don't you ever check this shit out? Go to snopes, the thug doing the beating is NOT Michael Brown.
Just another Black guy who looks like him because Fox News told you so.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/shawnspall.asp (http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/shawnspall.asp)
And that is the problem with you baggerboys: you will believe any sh*t they fling at you because, like Mulder, your motto is "I want to believe".
-
You mean like, if you like your insurance and you like your Dr, you can keep them....period? That kind of flung s#!+?
-
Michael Brown was a big thug that wont be bullying and robbing anymore.
-
Where are SNOPES facts that this is not Michael Brown?
Oh "it looks like this guy is not tall enough"
Oh "it looks like this skin tone is different"
Where are the facts he did not have pierced ears?
The video "suggests"....blah blah.
-
Just another Black guy who looks like him because Fox News told you so.
BTW I just checked Snopes and I can't find anything about FOX News telling me anything about this video!
-
wherever you found it, it is clearly typical bagger nonsense. If even Fox will not touch it, that should tell you something.
-
So, if Fox doesn't touch, that should tell us something. But if they do "touch" something, that indicates that.....it can't be believed? Quite the double standard you have working there. :o
-
Not at all.
Let us say that supposed "news" stories can be ranked on a scale of zero to ten. Zero would be if they are totally crap, ten would be totally true.
Fox has a very gullible audience, but even they cannot spew total crap that can be easily disproved. This clip, taken on someone's phone, somewhere, at some time, shows some large guy beating up a smaller guy. It would be less credible only if the big guy was alleged to be Al Sharpton, or perhaps Juniorbush or Dick Cheney. The latter would get a negative rating.
This clip only proves that probably some large Black dude and his posse did beat up a smaller guy, somewhere at some time. CU4 and sirs want to believe the worst, so they do. Snopes has no reason to lie or disbelieve this. They certainly have better means of judging the credibility of this clip than sirs of=r CU4, who have none at all.
Fox regularly runs crappy opinions about things that have some basis in truth. Something bad did happen in Benghazi, after all. Fox would not run a clip taken in Benghazi and state that it was filmed in Akron, Puyallup or Punxatawney. But they can blame it on Hillary.
-
Fox regularly runs crappy opinions about things that have some basis in truth.
CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC regularly run crappy opinions about things that have some basis in truth.
-
Not at all.
Actually, yes, at all. The idea that you can rationalize when Fox is telling some truth vs opinion is ludicrous on its face. Your opinion on gullability is also laughable, especially when apparently you're proclaiming a majority of the country is gullible, as Fox News is the highest rated broadcasting news source. Then again, they did believe Obama's boat load of dren to elect him, so perhaps you're on to something
-
The point is that this phone video has ZERO basis in truth, since the aggressor is not Michael Brown. That is why not even Fox "News" would run it.
-
The point is you have no facts that refute the video. If its not Brown, who is it??
-
Someone who was a different person. This country has probably half a million Black guys that could be mistaken by dunderheads like you and CU4 for Michael Brown. He is Black, he is large, yeah, that has to be him.
The proof in all accusations lies with the accuser. Proving that is IS Michael Brown would therefore be YOUR job.
There were fake Treyvon tapes as well. There are bunches of clowns scanning the Internet for crap they can post to make themselves look like heroes.
-
So, in other words, you have no facts to refute the claim. That's kinda what I thought. It just HAD to be someone else...because....it just has to be :o
-
I suggest that since snopes is a vastly more respected authority than you will ever be, that the burden of proof lies upon you. No way that guy is 6'5" tall.
-
Without a measuring tool, or something else to use as a basis of comparison, within the shot, I'd opine that the person could very well be 6'5". Now, prove he isn't
-
Six foot five is very tall. Comparing this guy to the others there makes it pretty clear that they are all about the same height.
I will take snopes over you any day of the week.
-
Perspective is everything. Most people think Sylvester Stallone and Tom Cruise are over 6ft, but when they stand next to people that one KNOWS their height, then you can deduce an actual height, which in their cases, is no more than 5ft 8". If you look at a huddle of football players, most all look the same height. But when you put them next to a referee, the actual height becames apparent. Point being, simply standing next to another person means nothing, unless you know the height of the other. The others could be nearly as tall. I'll take truth over yours and snopes non-valid assumptions, any and every day of the weel
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn2eDyaq3mQ
I don't know the people involved well enough to recognize them in this video, but whoever they are I see them needing arrest pretty badly.
If this isn't Michael Brown, perhaps he still needs arrest.
If the topic is Michael Brown, then this video is not sufficient without a good connection, perhaps the person shooting this video could tell where and when it happened.
-
It is unclear why they are beating up this guy. Still, this is seriously bullying, and the person shooting the video is more an accomplice of the perps than the victim, and I do not think that the guy who recorded this would voluntarily reveal anything. This is clearly a case of assault and battery.
There were phony Trevon tapes, and this is a phony Michael Brown tape.
The accuser (in this case the person accusing this of being a tape featuring Michael Brown) always bears the obligation to prove the accusation. Snopes I have found to be trustworthy. sirs and CU4 will believe anything that favors their reactionary anti-Black cause.
-
sirs and CU4 will believe anything that favors their reactionary anti-Black cause.
Showing a black victim of a sickening "black on black" assault is "anti-Black"?
Ha Ha...yeah sure.
What is anti-black is your ilk sensationalizing "white on black" incidents
diverting attention away from the much larger problem of "black on black" crime.
-
sirs and CU4 will believe anything that favors their reactionary anti-Black cause.
Showing a black victim of a sickening "black on black" assault is "anti-Black"?
Ha Ha...yeah sure.
What is anti-black is your ilk sensationalizing "white on black" incidents
diverting attention away from the much larger problem of "black on black" crime.
BINGO!
-
It is simply fraudulent to claim that a video that is supposedly shows Michael Brown as a thug that is not actually a video of Michael Brown proves that Michael Brown somehow deserves the death penalty .
-
It's even more fraudulent to claim that Brown deserved a death penalty by anyone that doesn't agree with your mutated POV