Jim DeMint is absolutely correct

[sirs]

Not really a smart move Bt.  I called you on a misrepresentation, and you're gonna hide behind a "direct quote"?  The meaning of your guffaw was quite clear.  You have yet to clarify that joke, if your meaning was something other that what it clearly infers

You ready to fix that?  I know its your hobby now, but the apparent repetition is leaving subsequent efforts, sorely lacking

You made a direct charge that i lied about your position.

Not lied, misrepresented, since your inference was crystal CLEAR, and linked that specific passage, twice to compliment your original effort.  You then went and tried to hide behind some "direct quote" defense.  Lame, but it was all you had, rather than either
a) clarify that you did NOT mean to imply I was referencing ONLY 1 party, even though that's how it clearly looked
b) admit that "yea, perhaps I took a little liberty on your position"

Your choice, your credibility.  Simple as that

[BT]

Lying about your position and misrepresenting your position are the same thing.

It's obvious you can't provide a direct quote so all this is about what you inferred.

Next time ask for clarification before you call me a liar.

[sirs]

Lying about your position and misrepresenting your position are the same thing.

If you say so

It's obvious you can't provide a direct quote

Never claimed a quote, that'd be your lame deflection effort

so all this is about what you inferred.

sirs It's an addiction to some.....DC in particular, Liberal Democrats especially

Bt lol

like there were no defits and or national debt under GOP congresses and Executive branches.

The problem with addiction is that it can not be abated by those still in denial.

It's what anyone would infer.  If that's not clearly implying an all inclusive democrat position, then you're using a different dictionary

Next time ask for clarification before you call me a liar.

Per your request.......if you wish to be known as a liar, so be it.  I guess if you meant to do so.... I was really hoping it was an a) or b) option, that I referenced above.  Sad to see it was a far more nefarious option c), apparently     

[BT]

Per your request.......if you wish to be known as a liar, so be it. 

Calling someone a liar yet being unable to produce the lie makes the charge and the one leveling the charge suspect.

[sirs]

I produced the clear inference, in spades.  Your non-answering it, isn't helping you out, in the least

[BT]

I produced the clear inference, in spades.  Your non-answering it, isn't helping you out, in the least

Telling me how came to your conclusions is not the same as producing the lie you said i told. There is a huge difference and i am beginning to see that you don't comprehend that.

Work on it.

[sirs]

Your non answering the clear message is validating it more and more, Bt.  Why do you insist on bring yourself down, like that??     

[BT]

You know what. I don't need to put up with being called a liar by someone who can't produce the lie.

Maybe you need some time to think about that.

[sirs]

I demonstrated the misrepresentation.  You're the one insisting its a lie, and your continued efforts to not clarify that, validates it more, each and every time you try to make this about me

Think about that

[BT]

I demonstrated the misrepresentation.  You're the one insisting its a lie, and your continued efforts to not clarify that, validates it more, each and every time you try to make this about me

Think about that

You did not produce a direct quote. You simply inferred meaning and claimed misrepresentation. And prior to making that claim you did not ask for clarification. Those were your actions so of course it is about you. And frankly i am tired of being accused about lying about your positions when you can't even come up with the lie.

You owe me an apology.

[sirs]

I demonstrated the misrepresentation.  You're the one insisting its a lie, and your continued efforts to not clarify that, validates it more, each and every time you try to make this about me

Think about that

You did not produce a direct quote.

I DID NOT REQUIRE ONE, NOR WAS ONE REFERENCED.  THATS A MISDIRECTION TACTIC ON YOUR END

You simply inferred meaning

WHICH YOU HAVE YET TO DISAGREE WITH AND/OR CLARIFY

and claimed misrepresentation.

THE LACK OF YOU RESPONDING DIRECTLY TO A CLARIFICATION CONTINUES TO VALIDATE THE VERY CLEAR WORDING, AND DEBUNKS THE NOTION THAT NO CLARIFICATION WAS EVER ASKED FOR

YOUR EFFORTS TO MAKE THIS ABOUT ME DEMONSTRATE JUST HOW DEEP A HOLE YOU'RE DIGGING FOR YOURSELF

You owe me an apology.

NOT EVEN IN THE SLIGHTEST.  THIS IS NOT THE ROAD YOU WANT TO GO DOWN, BT

[BT]

Your choice. I'll rethink your suspension in a week.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Sirs is always right. The truth is always on his side. If it is not, then he waits for the truth to appear.

Has anyone else noted how many discussions end with sirs blathering about some minuscule detail so trivial that it is impossible to understand what it really is?

 

[Kramer]

Sirs is always right. The truth is always on his side. If it is not, then he waits for the truth to appear.

Has anyone else noted how many discussions end with sirs blathering about some minuscule detail so trivial that it is impossible to understand what it really is?

piss off

[Christians4LessGvt]

Sirs is always right. The truth is always on his side.

Oh as if you dont think you are always right
and give credit to conservatives for ever being right!
Ha!

Has anyone else noted how many discussions end with sirs blathering about some minuscule detail so trivial that it is impossible to understand what it really is?

SIRS is right a heck of a lot more often than not.
In fact I think SIRS is dead-on about 95% of the time.

Hell yeah SIRS follows the discussion down to "minuscule details"
isn't that the point?
or are we just to shout slogans and not dig deeper?
sure occasionally the "define is" gets boring between the "two bickering old ladies"
sure it becomes more about ego..."you did!"...."did not!"...."did too"....blah blah

However without SIRS this place would really suck....
But to be honest it would suck without you too XO.

whateva......