1. There is little difference between a misrepresentation and a lie.
2. the quote i provided indicates serial misrepresentation (lies)
3. Sirs could not provide a quote indicating the lie, the best he could do was explain how he came to that conclusion.
4. He hurled the charge without seeking clarification before hurling the charge
5. The archives can show a pattern of him doing this.
In fairness when you discuss issues are you not "fair game"?
Why as a debater, not moderator, are you different than XO or anyone else?
As a debater you should hold your own and not suddenly switch to moderator to "win"
Do you need the "extra help" where if you get pissed you throw someone out?
Do we need to "walk on eggshells" in debates with you and treat you different?
You might have a point there. And i struggled with it. And basically i came to the conclusion that i don't have to put up with being called a liar (misrepresenter) if the accuser can't even come up with the lie (misrepresentation), even if i am a moderator.
But the larger lesson was for all members to think twice before calling someone a liar, dumbass, communist, cripple or any other off topic slur that they would hurl with the intent to insult or hurt instead of furthering the debate.
But apparently that lesson did not succeed, what with debating the difference between the meaning of misrepresentation vs lie, or why it even matters.
I'll lift Sirs suspension.