<<Let me nail you down then!
<<When will the fight be over.
<<NO guessing. I want a date.>>
What a question! We've had this discussion before, plane. A few years ago. And my answer now is the same as it was then, it was a parable from the life of the Buddha. The Buddha in his travels through the forest hears sounds of shouting and conflict, and comes upon a man with his arms locked around the trunk of a tree, hugging it as if his life depended on it. "What is the problem, my friend, and can I help you in any way?" And the man looks at the Buddha and says, "I'm trying to move on, Buddha, but this tree won't let go of me."
The fight will end when the aggressor goes home. You won't change the Afghans. Nobody else could and neither can you.
<<1)Tell me when Al Quieda will stop attacking Americans it finds vunerable .>>
Al Qaeda? Probably never. As long as America continues to occupy Muslim lands, interfere in Muslim states, support Israeli oppression, that's how long al Qaeda will continue attacking Americans wherever it can. You must stop your aggressions against the Muslims before they stop their retaliation against you. Your question seems to presuppose that it is al Qaeda that is the aggressor against America, which is true enough in fact, but completely ignores the causes of the hostility. Al Qaeda is in fact a reactive force, and control over what it is reacting against is wholly in American hands.
<<2)Tell me when Osama Bin Laden will die?*>>
What is the difference when OBL dies? OBL is not the cause of the fight any more than Obama is. Why don't you ask when will Obama die? Because even if both of them died tomorrow, the fight would go on. It is a war of policies, not men. The War Party in America, which includes both "political parties" has decided upon a policy of exploitation and oppression in the Middle East and such a policy will always generate armed resistance, of which OBL is only one example. Obama is not the leader of the War Party, only one of its pawns. Bush, IMHO, was closer to the source than Obama, but he too did not set the agenda. OBL is purely reactionary with no real program other than a fundamentalist religion and killing the infidel invaders. Killing him is not going to solve any of your problems in the region. He'll become a martyr and others will quickly take his place.
<<WE might stop , but if they do not also stop ,we will return to fighting, no two ways about it.>>
Depends what exactly it is that you might stop, doesn't it? That Israeli albatross is one big, heavy bird. So is your need for oil. Between the two of them, I don't think you are going to be able to "stop," no matter what it is costing you. That is why you are going broke and that is why the world's other power centres are going to eclipse you in the long run. You are blowing trillions on pointless wars and pointless allies that do not advance your national interests.
<<Only we will fight with less paitience as the years go by.>>
What patience? You flatter yourselves.
<<How would you have written a speech for Winston Chirchill?>>
Winston did alright without any help from me, plane. But Bush and Obama aren't Winston Churchill and Osama is not Hitler.
<<" We will fight them on the beaches , we will fight them on the streets , we will fight them in the hills and woods , we will fight them untill our ultimate victory, or untill April next year . turn over a new leaf in our relations with the Muslim world. We will stop supporting those who oppress the Muslims and steal their land. We will stop supporting those who defy UN resolutions and continue a military occupation of millions of Muslims that has continued longer than any other military occupation in modern history. We will stop supporting the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank and its Apartheid Wall. We will get out of Iraq. We will get out of Afghanistan. We will stop undermining the legitimate government of the Islamic Republic of Iran. We will stop supporting the dictators of Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco and the Gulf States. We will end our interference in the civil wars of Somalia and Yemen. We will pay fair reparations to the families of those Muslims we have blown to pieces, tortured, raped and murdered and humbly beg forgiveness for our crimes against them." Not as eloquent as Winston, but then who the hell is?
<<*(here is a hint , Osama Bin Laden will die on a day of American national celebration)>>
That's kind of a thuggish joke in itself. You certainly would not appreciate someone telling you that your President will die on a day of Muslim religious celebration. Yet OBL has killed fewer than 3,000 Americans and both Bush and Obama have each killed many times that number of innocent Muslim women and children. I think you are just reinforcing all of America's negativity, calling for a day of national rejoicing on the death of an enemy leader, especially someone you once supported unequivocally when he was killing the people you wanted him to kill. Maybe if you had not supported such a murderous thug in the first place you would not have felt his lash further on down the road. The law of karma does seem to be inescapable on some occasions, doesn't it?
You reap what you sow.