Some real charmers, here.....
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/09/sandra_bernhard.htmlhttp://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/09/bill_mahers_sit.htmlhttp://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/09/failed_comedian.html---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I checked 'em all out and they were kind of disappointing.
First, Sandra Bernhard - - the clip didn't show what the text referred to, her threatening Palin with rape by black street criminals if she dared come to Manhattan, so I can't say how that would have been presented. I think some of the more traditional blacks might have found this offensive, also lots of bourgeois women. She's a very angry lady and in the clip, I think she was just expressing the anger in political and religious formats, as she often does, but I think I got the point in each format, the religious one was a little easier, I'm not exactly sure what she was trying to say about Palin politically. It didn't really seem important enough to bother about, frankly. This was pretty much run-of-the-mill Bernhard, Palin supposedly gave it a contemporary edge, but really nothing new. She was probably a lot better ten or fifteen years ago, the message never changes, I'm starting to feel kind of sorry for her. Maybe the rape thing had some funny angle to it in a live performance, but I dunno. If she came to Toronto, there's a 50-50 chance I'd bother to take in the show. Our friend can always get passes to some of the comedy clubs, so if it's free I'd probably catch the act just for the Palin rape schtick, but otherwise fuhgeddabowdit.
The Bill Maher stuff was funnier - - Free Levi!! - - but someone should tell whoever created the negative image of Maher ("shit-for-brains") that George Grosz beat him or her to it 75 years ago in a much better, funnier painting. (We saw the original in Berlin, but I'll be God-damned if I can remember the museum, probably the
Neue Nationalgalerie.) I agree with the Free Levi! stuff except that if he plays his cards right, the baby can live, he can still get an education and maybe more than he'd get if he "lit off fer the Territories," and maybe he and Bristol can craft some kinda life for each other. OTOH, seems kinda dumb and sad for the guy to get nailed down this early in his young and stupid life, if Bristol wants to have the baby without him, I'm sure they've got the resources in the Palin family to see that nobody goes hungry.
And the last guy was just - - so-so. But he raised a point, maybe Bristol really needs some counselling because the mum's political ambitions might be causing her to sacrifice Bristol's best interests or even thwarting her will. What if Bristol really wants an abortion and the mum is exerting undue influence to make her carry to term. I don't know if simply posting the price of an abortion for Bristol is the answer, but given the apparent lack of interest by the Governor in her own family members, maybe a court should step in and make Bristol its ward, and then determine what is actually in her best interests with regard to the pregnancy.