Can Marco Rubio manage money?

[sirs]

And this is NOT ABOUT HILLARY.

LOL....see what I mean? 

4 Fricken tickets, over 17years, and that's what should disqualify him from being President of the U.S.  And the cherry is that he didn't use his inflence to get them removed from his record......oh the horror!! 

Do you see how bassackward you're being, where you expect a politican to push his position to get something removed.  Here's a newsflash, THAT's where the biggest scandal takes place.....THE COVER-UP.  If he was found to have used his influence to remove tickets from his record, you'd be going apesnot over that.  But instead, you're condemning him for NOT using his influence   

As far as a Candiate makes, the more the left foams at the mouth, demonstrates just how excellent a candidate he would make.  When you consider every desperate piece of hyperbolic garbage you try to stick to him, is plastered all over the Democrat's top nominee.....ESPECIALLY (per YOUR parameters) AS IT RELATES TO THE WORST...SELLING SELF TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER.  And if "the issue is what kind of candidate she would make", I think you're doing a swell job of providing the appropriate comparisons

[Xavier_Onassis]

My assumption is that he DID hire an attorney and not get the first tickets put on his record, and that he also exhausted the contacts he had to get them removed.
That is par for the course in Miami.

A neighbor of mine with no political contacts at all  got seven tickets for DUI before one of them appeared on his record. It cost him around ten grand and he attended traffic school twice to keep the first six ticket off his record.

I live here and I know how it works. You don't and you can't.

Far more important is how he has pissed away his money like a sailor on shore leave.
Winston Churchill was probably too drunk to drive most of his life, but he was so rich he always had a chauffeur, so DUI's and other bad driving are not all that relevant to the suitability of a candidate for president.

"Conservatives" are always talking about  FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, and prettyboy Rubio  does not seem to have a lot of this.
The guy knocks down over $2,000,000 in salary and after decades he has not managed to save even $100K for retirement?   
Cashing in all you have put away for retirement, and paying a $20K penalty for getting $24K to keep: is that responsible?
To actually claim to be a CONSERVATIVE, doesn't it require at least conserving your own resources?

 

[sirs]

Your assumptions, speculation, and guesses, aside, the fact is he's only had 4 fricken tickets in a span of 17 years, and there's no proof he tried to use his connections to get them removed from his record.  In fact, your condemning him from NOT using his connections to get them removed.  Again, how bassackward is that

And with the debt that this President is ringing up, all by himself, compared to EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT COMBINED, gives you no standing to complain about someone else's finances.  Especially since that's not the primary function of the president.  That'd be his Treasury Secretary and Congress.  President merely signs the bills sent to his desk

[Xavier_Onassis]

I am not responsible the the national debt, you insufferable twit. Every president since Eisenhower has increased the national debt. The current president was faced with increasing the debt or see the country suffer a rerun of the Great Depression,and people of all political and economical persuasions admit that this was essential.  But we are not discussing the past or Hillary, we are discussing the profligate lifestyle of Marco Rubio.

[sirs]

I am not responsible the the national debt, you insufferable twit.

Speaking of insuffrable Dr Deflection, who ever claimed you were solely responsible for it?  Hmmmmmmm??

Every president since Eisenhower has increased the national debt. The current president was faced with increasing the debt or see the country suffer a rerun of the Great Depression,

So, when Bush ran a fraction of debt, to this President, then Candidate Obama proclaimed such debt as literally unpatriotic.  Again, see how hypocritically upside-down you guys are?

 

...and people of all political and economical persuasions admit that this was essential. 

No...and no.  That was NOT required or universally agreed upon.  In fact, those policies have literally put a wet blanket on a recevery that has been beyond pitiful.  Reagan had a similar economic disaster, that he ineherited, and did just the opposite of Obama.....and tax revenues surged, as we pulled out of the economic mess Carter saddled us with, in not only half the time, but with exponential job growth

But we are not discussing the past or Hillary, we are discussing the profligate lifestyle of Marco Rubio.

Umm, yes we are.  Hillary's simply a bigger target, given her net worth is double that of even even Bush.  Yea, that's right, that so-called person of the people, that so called connection to the middle class is worth double good 'ol Jeb.  IN FACT, of all the candidates running, she had the highest net worth  But its funny....Romney was too rich to know what its like to be a middle class American or connect to them, but Hillary, in her chauffered limos over the last 2+ decades, chartered jets, and 21+million dollar net worth is right there with "the people"

That baggage just keeps getting heavier and heavier

[Plane]

  Since the Democrats seem to already be settled on Hillary(it is her turn).
It is important to consider how a prospective Republican stacks up to her.

    One of her strengths is the ability to spend more than two billion dollars on campaigning.

     Should we choose a candidate that can't match this there will be a severe disadvantage.

[Xavier_Onassis]

The Bush FAMILY is richer than the proverbial Croesus: there is no comparison with Clinton or any of the rest, with perhaps the exception of Romney or that clown, Trump.

We will not know how much money is being spent on campaigns this year, because the idiot Supreme Court made it possible for contributors to remain anonymous. The wealth of the candidate is not any sort of absolute issue. FDR was richer than most of those who ran against him, and  he related far more to the average American.

No matter who is chosen, the odds are that they have been financed by people you would not like if you knew who they were.

 

[sirs]

lol....and here I thought this was about Rubio....and "Rubio only".  amazing how the bar keeps changing   

[Xavier_Onassis]

It is really about Rubio, but there you went changing the subject.

[sirs]

Apparently not since now you're harping on Jeb, when Hillary's net worth is 2x his.  It's truly challenging to keep up with your floating parameters

[Xavier_Onassis]

Rubio is clearly a suckup to the real estate swindlers that run Miami Dade County. He simply sucks up to a different bunch of them than Jebbie.

YOU are the one that thinks this is all about your irrational Hillary Hatred.

[sirs]

Your opinion of "clearly", is right up there with "obvious", as in neither are supported by actual facts.  The fact you can't seem to deal with has nothing to do with anyone's hatred....it has to do with your gal being the current version of Romney of the Democrat party.  Her net worth double that of Jeb, and 20x that of Rubio.  And those are facts

[Plane]

  Is remembering Hillary's failures faults and fabrications ,"irrational Hillary Hatred"?

[Xavier_Onassis]

fabricating all this crap is precisely that.
Hillaryhate has been a keystone of the ratbag right ever since Bill Clinton was elected. Hillary is an apostate, a former Republican that has joined the other side after seeing the light.

Just as the ratbag right campaigned for forty years to make "Liberal" a dirty word, they have campaigned at least twenty to make Hillary a dirty word.

[sirs]

fabricating all this crap is precisely that.

And what specifically is being "fabricated"?  (this should be good)