Wow, what a horrible day for McCain, the Right

[Amianthus]

Exactly . And Trent Lott was Majority Leader when the Homeland Security Law was passed. So the Dems did not create that piece of shit. The one Dem that spnsored an earlier version is now an Ind and kisses Repub asses now, Joe Leiberman.

Err, so in your twisted little universe, Homeland Security was passed between January 20th, 2001 and June 5th, 2001 (the dates that Lott was Majority leader)? Because in the real universe, it didn't pass until 2002, well after Daschle had become Majority Leader.

[Knutey]

Exactly . And Trent Lott was Majority Leader when the Homeland Security Law was passed. So the Dems did not create that piece of shit. The one Dem that spnsored an earlier version is now an Ind and kisses Repub asses now, Joe Leiberman.

Err, so in your twisted little universe, Homeland Security was passed between January 20th, 2001 and June 5th, 2001 (the dates that Lott was Majority leader)? Because in the real universe, it didn't pass until 2002, well after Daschle had become Majority Leader.

Not the point at all. BT said
 >Homeland Security, as the behemoth that passed, was a dem creation.<
It was clear that the bill was going to pass in Nov of 2001

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1121/p01s03-usju.html

The main Dem that had input was that traitor Leiberman.
>Bi-partisan? Lieberman sponsored S. 2452, an earlier version of the Homeland Security Act, which was absorbed into HR 5710, the final version that passed the House.<
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/HSA_RoAPS.html

So once again you are supplying wortless "facts" which are wortless because they lack context and are designed to mislead like all Repub facts seem to be anymore.

[Amianthus]

Not the point at all. BT said
 >Homeland Security, as the behemoth that passed, was a dem creation.<
It was clear that the bill was going to pass in Nov of 2001

And in November of 2001, Daschle was the Senate Majority Leader.

You have a point?

[BT]

Apparently this:

I can admit a mistake, but this isnt one.

is an untruth.

[Knutey]

Not the point at all. BT said
 >Homeland Security, as the behemoth that passed, was a dem creation.<
It was clear that the bill was going to pass in Nov of 2001

And in November of 2001, Daschle was the Senate Majority Leader.

You have a point?

Yes the point is that you are again harping on an anal non-point. The Homeland Security Act was not a Dem creation no matter who was Majority Leader was

[Knutey]

Apparently this:

I can admit a mistake, but this isnt one.

is an untruth.

Is a mistake about being mistaken about an irrelevant deflection.

[Amianthus]

Yes the point is that you are again harping on an anal non-point. The Homeland Security Act was not a Dem creation no matter who was Majority Leader was

Then why did you make a point of harping on the fact that Lott was the Majority Leader at the time it passed when it wasn't true?

[BT]

Is a mistake about being mistaken about an irrelevant deflection.

A mistake is a mistake.

A lie is when you said you would admit a mistake when you make them.

You said the GOP held all three branches.

You were mistaken.

Lieberman and the dems wanted the creation of a cabinet level bureaucracy.

Bush wanted it to be run by the VP's office,

The HSA was a dem creation as passed.

[Knutey]

Is a mistake about being mistaken about an irrelevant deflection.

A mistake is a mistake.

A lie is when you said you would admit a mistake when you make them.

You said the GOP held all three branches.

You were mistaken.

Lieberman and the dems wanted the creation of a cabinet level bureaucracy.

Bush wanted it to be run by the VP's office,

The HSA was a dem creation as passed.

And we are certainly lucky that it was or we would have given even more power to the evil one to fuck things up even worse.

[Christians4LessGvt]

i sure hope he learned his lesson: "DONT MESS WITH AMIANTHUS"

even i dont like taggling with dat rascal!

[Knutey]

i sure hope he learned his lesson: "DONT MESS WITH AMIANTHUS"

even i dont like taggling with dat rascal!

Ya win a few and ya lose a few. I have won more than my share with the idiot savant.

[sirs]

i sure hope he learned his lesson: "DONT MESS WITH AMIANTHUS"  even i dont like taggling with dat rascal!

Ya win a few and ya lose a few. I have won more than my share with the idiot savant.

    Name 1

[Christians4LessGvt]

"Ya win a few and ya lose a few. I have won more than my share with the idiot savant"

yeah knutey and ya learn alot too.
this message board for as much as we "hate on each other" is educational

[Knutey]

i sure hope he learned his lesson: "DONT MESS WITH AMIANTHUS"  even i dont like taggling with dat rascal!

Ya win a few and ya lose a few. I have won more than my share with the idiot savant.

    Name 1

The one where I proved that points are indeed interest but you probly dont think so because you dont have the savant part.

[Knutey]

"Ya win a few and ya lose a few. I have won more than my share with the idiot savant"

yeah knutey and ya learn alot too.
this message board for as much as we "hate on each other" is educational

Maybe for you , but for me it is fun & games with RW morons.