DebateGate

General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: sirs on May 09, 2016, 08:49:09 PM

Title: What a shocker
Post by: sirs on May 09, 2016, 08:49:09 PM
....as in not (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/emails-found-hillary-clintons-senior-staffer-state-department/story?id=38989504)
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: Christians4LessGvt on May 09, 2016, 09:26:20 PM
i guess Nixon should have been as corrupt as Hillary
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: Christians4LessGvt on May 09, 2016, 09:28:45 PM
and it is unacceptable for the IRS & now this guy to claim this stuff is missing or plead the 5th
they should be jailed
it's called "consequences"
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: sirs on May 09, 2016, 09:41:39 PM
The trick now is delay...delay...delay
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on May 10, 2016, 08:49:52 AM
No one is going to jail.
This is not corruption.

The purpose of forcing the Secretary of State to use a government computer is to protect the secrets of the nation. If there were secrets in these e mails, now no one can access them. So the purpose of the rule has been upheld. You should effing rejoice.

Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: sirs on May 10, 2016, 01:46:09 PM
Nixon was such a dummy.....all he needed to do was make the tapes disappear.....poof no crime

 ::)

No, xo, that's NOT the primary purpose of Government employees using Government computers.  Government employees are by definition, empoyed by we the tax payers.  One of Congress's primary roles is oversight.  By having everyone using Goverment computers is to allow Congress to keep tabs on making sure everyone is both doing their Government job, and to maintain a central location for secured information, including "secrets of the nation"

When crucial/important materials mysteriously disappear (a common pattern with the Clintons), especially prior to an investigation being performed, the common denominator is cover-up, and yes, corruption.  Its patently obvious that if this were a Trump Administration, you'd be screaming cover-up.  Point being, that no, we're not rejoicing that important materials needed for an investigation, have suddenly vanished.  The State Dept's Computer system appears to be as old as NASA, if we're to believe these are all just unfortunate technical glitches
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on May 10, 2016, 04:56:55 PM
Its patently obvious that if this were a Trump Administration, you'd be screaming cover-up.


I am really getting tired of your constantly telling me what I would do.

There ain't gonna be no Trump Administration.
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: sirs on May 10, 2016, 05:22:04 PM
Nice, albeit transparent deflection.  If there were, and this happened, you'd be screaming bloody murder.  Like I said, apparently had Nixon simply had those tapes "mysteriously disappear", there would have been no laws broken.  So, that's how it works, right?
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: sirs on May 10, 2016, 06:15:41 PM
Point being, that no, we're not rejoicing that important materials needed for an investigation, have suddenly vanished.  The State Dept's Computer system appears to be as old as NASA, if we're to believe these are all just unfortunate technical glitches

wow...when it rains, it pours (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/05/10/after-obama-administration-caught-lying-about-iran-deal-state-department-deletes-video-to-cover-up-n2161098).  Will the media care?
Title: Re: What a shocker
Post by: Plane on May 11, 2016, 08:20:01 PM
   Hillary has no motive for keeping her own "Local area network" for e-mail that is not corrupt.

    As an incompetent secretary of state , she wanted to escape Congressional oversight, as a corrupt public official, she wanted to hide her papers from the freedom of information act.

      Try to imagine a good reason to roll your own security , that is not involved in corruption, while there already exists a secure network maintained for your benefit?

       This is not only an illegal thing to do , it is a ridiculous thing to do.

        It speaks to a Nixonian pessimism , paranoia and suspicion causing this desperate attempt at hiding the facts as fast as they became facts , preparing to hide the facts even before there were any facts.