First off, there are NO "tea party leaders" in this clip. So Kramer simply mislabeled this.
Second, the woman said that it was not the fact that the farmer was White that bothered her so much as his trying to show that he was superior to her. This is not racism: she DID refer him to someone who was supposedly qualified to help.
A) It's about her problem in perceiving what this WHITE man was supposedly doing. She made it clear it was about his race, by referring to it, several times. It's indeed racist
B) She, as an official, is SUPPOSED to be impartial, is SUPPOSED to not allow race to cloud her judgement. SHE herself, had the ability to assist him, and chose not to.....again, largely because of his race. Doesn't matter who she may or may not have "referred" him to. This is about her actions
C) Kramer frequently uses a reverse of titles, to get folks to think about what's really happening. Everyone on the left wants to claim that the Tea Party is a bunch of racist hicks, minus any evidence of this of course, yet here, we have clear evidence of a racist rant, but since its by a black person....well, we have to rationalize why it's not. Thanks for your examples of trying to do so