Author Topic: How Sandy Berger Stole State Secrets, Destroyed Evidence & Got Off  (Read 8558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: How Sandy Berger Stole State Secrets, Destroyed Evidence & Got Off
« Reply #30 on: January 11, 2007, 12:42:51 PM »
Why would Berger admit to destroying documents if he didn't destroy them?

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: How Sandy Berger Stole State Secrets, Destroyed Evidence & Got Off
« Reply #31 on: January 11, 2007, 01:06:14 PM »
Perhaps they incriminate the Bush "administration" in some manner and he wants to hold them to use at the right moment.

Perhaps he leaked them and wanted people to think he destroyed his and wasn't the leaker.

Perhaps he knew they vindicated the Clinton administration and wanted the public to think that he destroyed them but secretly told the Bush "administration" that he didn't and used them as some kind of leverage.

Perhaps they incriminated the Clinton administration and he wanted to keep Hillary out of the race.

The real question is "What did the documents say?"


Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: How Sandy Berger Stole State Secrets, Destroyed Evidence & Got Off
« Reply #32 on: January 11, 2007, 01:37:38 PM »
Perhaps they incriminate the Bush "administration" in some manner and he wants to hold them to use at the right moment.


Hahhahhahhahahhahhahahaa!

The real question is "What did the documents say?"



The real question is "What did the documents say?"


Yes! I am very courious!

Mucho

  • Guest
Re: How Sandy Berger Stole State Secrets, Destroyed Evidence & Got Off
« Reply #33 on: January 11, 2007, 02:17:17 PM »
Perhaps they incriminate the Bush "administration" in some manner and he wants to hold them to use at the right moment.


Hahhahhahhahahhahhahahaa!

The real question is "What did the documents say?"





The real question is "What did the documents say?"


Yes! I am very courious!


Whatever they said, they still say it because no originals were destroyed. I know you still want there to have been WMD's & ties to Al Quaeda in Iraq as well, but there werent. Please try to live in the world of reality once in a while.