Author Topic: Blood on his hands  (Read 13214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

richpo64

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #75 on: December 20, 2008, 01:36:43 PM »
No, I think making some people cringe is a good thing. I don't think I need any improvement when it comes to telling leftwing socialist/communists off. Don't they make you cringe? You don't seem to have a problem telling people off. Are you a work in progress? Should we start a thread to discuss you?

Making comments about other people on this board is a sure way to get into trouble. It's best not to act as if you some kind of a saint passing judgement.

Understand?

Peace.

Cynthia

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #76 on: December 20, 2008, 01:40:35 PM »
No, I think making some people cringe is a good thing. I don't think I need any improvement when it comes to telling leftwing socialist/communists off. Don't they make you cringe? You don't seem to have a problem telling people off. Are you a work in progress? Should we start a thread to discuss you?

Making comments about other people on this board is a sure way to get into trouble. It's best not to act as if you some kind of a saint passing judgement.

Understand?

Peace.

I feel for you, I do. You have such a touchy nature.

I'll refrain from comment, as it will only cause you to spin out.

Someday you need to read your posts in terms of the effect you have on others which causes them to 'cringe', Rich.

We are allowed to cringe when you post, eh? People cringe for different reasons, I might add.

I believe I have the right to speak,  and to be a saint.  ;D

Peace out!
« Last Edit: December 20, 2008, 02:12:14 PM by Cindy »

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #77 on: December 20, 2008, 02:25:55 PM »
Quote
>>Cindy, I write things as I see them..<<


>>One final word - - nothing I write here is original - -<<


Yeh, you're a real genius.

I'm Pretty sure BSB was referring to Mikey.

How Rich got drawn into that, i don't know.

richpo64

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #78 on: December 20, 2008, 02:31:05 PM »
>>How Rich got drawn into that, i don't know.<<

Exactly. I followed the thread back to try and find out, to no avail.

richpo64

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #79 on: December 20, 2008, 02:34:00 PM »
I think between the two of us it's just been proven who has the touchy nature.

I meant it in the spirit of reconciliation.

Nuff said.

[note to moderators: For some reason the word proven doesn't register spell check. It's weird.]

BSB

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #80 on: December 20, 2008, 03:00:48 PM »
Regarding Reply #77

Yeah, those are quotes from a post by Michael T. On the one hand he says he calls things as he sees them, on the other hand he says nothing he posts is original. 

BSB

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #81 on: December 20, 2008, 03:18:11 PM »
This is your problem Michael T.

While I agree with you that much of the current administrations public parseing on what is torture, and what isn't, is highly regreatful. And, while I agree with you that what took place at Gitmo, and at prisons in Iraq, and Afghanistan, is also highly regreatful. The difference is I don't therefore wish death and distruction on the American people, or any other people. You, on the other hand, are vengeful. That brings into question your take on world events.   

Cynthia

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #82 on: December 20, 2008, 03:41:23 PM »
I think between the two of us it's just been proven who has the touchy nature.

I meant it in the spirit of reconciliation.

Nuff said.

[note to moderators: For some reason the word proven doesn't register spell check. It's weird.]

Well, I am touchy, but that was the point.....we are just touchy in different ways, Rich.

Merry, Merry.

Peace out.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #83 on: December 20, 2008, 03:41:34 PM »
The answers to my last post range from the thoughtful to the ridiculous.  Mostly the latter, which just proves the point I was trying to make.  Once you hear Chomsky or Marx dismissed in a one-liner, it's bad enough, but when you get down to the "bad case of acne couldn't get a date to the prom" level - - you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel of ignorance and stupidity that is what makes it possible for a man like G.W. Bush to assume the leadership of the nation.  Naomi Klein of course isn't even mentioned in rebuttal, maybe she didn't have a date for the prom either.

The negative responses were really pitiful, actually, but I didn't expect much better.   I guess some attempt to at least follow the argument, but we get - - the Indians of New Mexico, the optimism and enthusiasm, etc., which of course no one is denying, as no one is denying the millions dead in Vietnam, the lynch mobs, the hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis, the ongoing attempts at subjugation.    I guess if you throw a couple hundred more Indians from New Mexico into the equation, it'll all balance out.  Somehow.  I dunno, I keep hoping:  I produce a serious response, and I get back lectures on bitterness, can't you turn that frowny frowny frown into one great big SMILE and remember the Indians of New Mexico???   Huh?  Whaaa . . .?

Well, I DID try.  No one can take that away from me.

Ok , I will deny that hundreds of thousands of Iriquis have been killed, though thousands certainly have.
Many of those were of course the ones we intended to kill.
The subjugation of Iraq was Saddams business and Iraq was subjugated quite well, the liberation of Iraq is more like what we want , and we have struggled heroicly getting it done.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2008, 03:46:29 PM by Plane »

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #84 on: December 20, 2008, 03:51:11 PM »




He was dead right about capitalism, and that is easily proven by the clothes on your back, the shoes on your feet and every Nissan, Hyundai, Honda and Toyota you see on every street: Capitalism will seek out ever cheaper locations of production, no matter what it does to the local industry or economy.

Its' not that clothes and shoes cannot be made in the USA and sold profitably. They can. But the capitalist will make the Nike for $10 in China rather than for $20 here to sell for $100, because 90% profit is better than 80%.




Objectively , isn't it true that 90% profit is better than 80% profit? The more purely the market operates the further the wealth will be spread, a skilled worker anywhere should have the chance to sell his efforts and participate in the creation of wealth.

BTW who is getting 90% profits on anything?

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #85 on: December 20, 2008, 05:28:29 PM »
<<Yeah, those are quotes from a post by Michael T. On the one hand he says he calls things as he sees them, on the other hand he says nothing he posts is original. >>

Seemed clear enough to me when I typed it - - I call things as I see them, and I'm not the only one who sees them and calls them the same way.  To most of the world's inhabitants, with the exception of brainwashed Americans (and even a minority within them) what I see and what I say is pretty damn obvious whether the right-wing morons who find it all so objectionable like it or not.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #86 on: December 20, 2008, 05:51:22 PM »
<<While I agree with you that much of the current administrations public parseing on what is torture, and what isn't, is highly regreatful. And, while I agree with you that what took place at Gitmo, and at prisons in Iraq, and Afghanistan, is also highly regreatful. The difference is I don't therefore wish death and distruction on the American people, or any other people. You, on the other hand, are vengeful. That brings into question your take on world events. >>

The torture is the tip of the iceberg.  The millions of dead, from Viet Nam to Indonesia to Latin America to Iraq AND the torture are a heavy load of unavenged atrocities that cries out for retribution.  If America punished its own criminals there would be no world sense that a huge crime or series of crimes requires payback of one kind or another.  The American people are no more or less deserving of massive retaliatory payback than the citizens of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, but both were subjects of regimes that committed unspeakable atrocities and made no effort to punish their own guilty.  Token prosecutions of low-ranking nonentities aside. 

What you are lacking is a sense of outrage.  "Highly regretful" is a ludicrous way of describing America's crimes.  "Regretful" or "regrettable" doesn't begin to cover it and you probably know better.  Whether or not the American people "deserve" actual punishment of some horrific nuclear catastrophe is debateable as I indicated before, but to put the idea before people is to at least indicate the scope of the atrocities - - which Americans are either denying completely, meretriciously rationalizing, or minimizing.  There are enormous wrongs extant and on-going, which deserve active war-crimes prosecutions (at the very highest levels) and massive amends and reparations.  Instead of which, you see this right-wing fascist shit proceeding in sheer ignorance of the facts to assert that nothing much has gone wrong (apart from the inevitable "mistakes" that America makes, which they are gracious enough to admit - - the old "We're not perfect" excuse which any fucking Nazi apologist would be familiar with.)

My feeling on payback is this:  ideally it should fall on the perpetrators themselves, but when it doesn't, it's worse for the crimes to go unavenged than for some type of cosmic retribution to fall on the nation, on the guilty and innocent alike.  It is only when mankind becomes accustomed to the idea that all wrongful actions WILL bring retribution, collective or individual, that the kind of behaviour which characterized the Bush administration will gradually become a thing of the past.  Unavenged crimes just encourage more of the same.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #87 on: December 20, 2008, 05:57:15 PM »
<<Ok , I will deny that hundreds of thousands of Iriquis have been killed, though thousands certainly have.>>

I believe hundreds of thousands were killed.

<<Many of those were of course the ones we intended to kill.>>

You had no right to kill ANY of them.

<<The subjugation of Iraq was Saddams business and Iraq was subjugated quite well, the liberation of Iraq is more like what we want , and we have struggled heroicly getting it done.>>

Bullshit.
 

BSB

  • Guest
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #88 on: December 20, 2008, 06:31:58 PM »
Regarding Reply #86

Boy, that's a sad post.

Tell you what Michael, lets follow your prescription and we'll consider the bombing of Japan as retaliatory payback for what they did to the Chinese. We'll consider the destruction of Iraq as retaliatory payback for their allowing a madman to run wild through the middle east. And we'll consider the war in Vietnam retaliatory payback for an event understood only by the Buddha.

You got BIG problems when it comes to reasoning, Mr. Tee.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Blood on his hands
« Reply #89 on: December 20, 2008, 06:42:53 PM »
I probably DO have big problems with regard to reasoning, BSB, because nothing in your last post made any sense to me at all.

I'm a simple guy, I start with a simple problem - - the blood and death and torture and rape wreaked by the U.S.A.   And I ask a simple question:  who pays for all this shit?

Well, it sure as hell ain't me.  Who do YOU think pays for it?